275 stock or more a little rumor i heard
245/.85=288
233/.85=274
I don't believe there is a "wrong" or "right" when it comes to this issue.
If the factory advertizes 275, you can take it or leave it. If you dynoed all the lts on the same dyno with the same conditions and came up with 245 to the rear, you still wouldn't know what the parasitic losses were unless you "actually" knew what the true hp/tq was at the crank.JMHO
233/.85=274
I don't believe there is a "wrong" or "right" when it comes to this issue.
If the factory advertizes 275, you can take it or leave it. If you dynoed all the lts on the same dyno with the same conditions and came up with 245 to the rear, you still wouldn't know what the parasitic losses were unless you "actually" knew what the true hp/tq was at the crank.JMHO
Originally posted by BUBBA
245/.85=288
233/.85=274
I don't believe there is a "wrong" or "right" when it comes to this issue.
If the factory advertizes 275, you can take it or leave it. If you dynoed all the lts on the same dyno with the same conditions and came up with 245 to the rear, you still wouldn't know what the parasitic losses were unless you "actually" knew what the true hp/tq was at the crank.JMHO
245/.85=288
233/.85=274
I don't believe there is a "wrong" or "right" when it comes to this issue.
If the factory advertizes 275, you can take it or leave it. If you dynoed all the lts on the same dyno with the same conditions and came up with 245 to the rear, you still wouldn't know what the parasitic losses were unless you "actually" knew what the true hp/tq was at the crank.JMHO
Good numbers. Assuming that .15 loss is the usual acceptable loss, and that the factory advertized 275 at the crank is accurate, that would mean you not only didn't lose any power though the DT, but you actually picked up 19 HP between the crank and the wheels.
Or...maybe the factory lies? No way!
Or...maybe the factory lies? No way!
i dynoed my car tonight at work just for the hell of it. put down 272hp and 306tq the only mod is the K&N it has a stock tstat. so yes the 305 its rated at is a little less than what it actually makes at the flywheel. and for the record i have 75k miles on the car now. trey
You guys may be right but I read this about SLP.
"When a buyer ordered the WS.6 package in 96 and 97, standard Trans am and Formula models were sent to SLP's production Facility not far from the F-body assembly plant in Ste. Therese, Quebec, for conversion".
I got this from http://www.yearone.com/enthusiast/re...slpfeature.pdf
So that does make it a SLP car, right?, right
Please prove me wrong
"When a buyer ordered the WS.6 package in 96 and 97, standard Trans am and Formula models were sent to SLP's production Facility not far from the F-body assembly plant in Ste. Therese, Quebec, for conversion".
I got this from http://www.yearone.com/enthusiast/re...slpfeature.pdf
So that does make it a SLP car, right?, right
Please prove me wrong
Last edited by Johnnynsac; Oct 16, 2003 at 11:48 PM.
if SLP did make them thats fine, it just doesnt make since why they would make both the WS6 and Firehawk when they are virutally the same. also why would they lable and number the SS cars and the Firehawks but not put any badging on the WS6 cars? just doesnt seem logical unless of course lots of money was involed and then it doesnt need to make since so long as everyone gets their money.
also i wonder if i called SLP on monday if they could tell me the build number of my car? id be interested to know thats for sure. Trey
also i wonder if i called SLP on monday if they could tell me the build number of my car? id be interested to know thats for sure. Trey
Originally posted by TA Dreaming
it just doesnt make since why they would make both the WS6 and Firehawk when they are virutally the same.
it just doesnt make since why they would make both the WS6 and Firehawk when they are virutally the same.
true but its still not a lot. i just figured it wasnt enough to justify the same company building two different cars that were not that different. and i had always heard that GM built them in house. Im gonna call SLP on monday and see what i can find out. if they did build them id really like to know my build number and maybe i can find out even more info about it, which is always good. Trey
Well lot of lls1 were dynoing around 300rwhp stock .Got to remember that cars do make more power with some break in miles and due to production tolerances etc some cars do just seem to have a bit more.My stock 96 seemed like a total animal.my stock 96 ta that I used to have.My stock 97 ram air seemed slower new than my 96 but maybe some of that was tires..the wider better tires on the 97 maybe had more grip than the 96..not sure.
Anyway dont' worry both ls1 and lt1 are great engines.I am proud to say I own examples of each and also proud to have an old 400 engine in my 80 ta..that one has really nice torque!!
Anyway dont' worry both ls1 and lt1 are great engines.I am proud to say I own examples of each and also proud to have an old 400 engine in my 80 ta..that one has really nice torque!!
Originally posted by TA Dreaming
if SLP did make them thats fine, it just doesnt make since why they would make both the WS6 and Firehawk when they are virutally the same.
if SLP did make them thats fine, it just doesnt make since why they would make both the WS6 and Firehawk when they are virutally the same.
(in 97 only). The Firehawk and the SS are basically different models of the Firebird and Camaro, and have SLP specific option code stickers on the car. The WS6 was GM taking the Firehawk idea, and making it easy for the buyer with a single option code of all the basic upgrades. The Firehawk was for the person that wanted the rarest Bird, with lots more option choices. Nothing wrong with either way of doing it, just different approaches for a different type of buyer. To support the different model type idea, take a look at NADA for a 97 Firebird (or most likely any year they made the Firehawk), they actually list the Firehawk as a seperate model of the Firebird vs the Formula or TA. The WS6 is an option package on the Formula or TA. You could say that SLP was similar to AMG before it got bought up by Mercedes.


