230/236 cam track #'s
Since we're talking about 6 speed cars here, what was your short time on that 12.32 pass? I ran my 12.210 on a 1.88 60' time. I'm just guessing(?) that the 114 vs 115.4 mph trap speed differences are the clue here.
1.601 60' on my 12.15 run, on the 10 bolt & stock suspension with a 230/236 cam 
Did you spin at all on that 12.2 run? With more gear, suspension work and a 6 speed I would think it'd be quicker than 1.7's with no wheel spin. I know at MIR I was cutting 1.71's with my stock LT1 with just a converter and 3.73's.
Have you tried running at MIR yet? I don't know how good or bad Capital Raceway is, but if you cut 1.7's there with your mods, I'd be willing to bet you could get your 11 second pass at MIR no problem, along with your 1.6 60'

Did you spin at all on that 12.2 run? With more gear, suspension work and a 6 speed I would think it'd be quicker than 1.7's with no wheel spin. I know at MIR I was cutting 1.71's with my stock LT1 with just a converter and 3.73's.
Have you tried running at MIR yet? I don't know how good or bad Capital Raceway is, but if you cut 1.7's there with your mods, I'd be willing to bet you could get your 11 second pass at MIR no problem, along with your 1.6 60'
Last edited by camaro81; Apr 15, 2008 at 01:50 PM.
Buzz, this really makes the comparison easy then.
With your cam you ran the "back" (i.e. 1320' - 60' = 1260'), 1260 feet of the 1/4 mile in 10.44 (i.e. 12.32 - 1.88), seconds, and accelerated to 114 mph in the process; while I went 10.33 in the last 1260 feet and topped out at 115.42 mph.
This sounds pretty much right "on target" considering the cam duration differences.
Remember the added lift we're running really doesn't help us with the stock heads, considering they really don't flow much more at .550" lift vs .500" lift. As you mentioned earlier, the performance difference between these two cams really does require running ported and/or better flowing heads.
With your cam you ran the "back" (i.e. 1320' - 60' = 1260'), 1260 feet of the 1/4 mile in 10.44 (i.e. 12.32 - 1.88), seconds, and accelerated to 114 mph in the process; while I went 10.33 in the last 1260 feet and topped out at 115.42 mph.
This sounds pretty much right "on target" considering the cam duration differences.
Remember the added lift we're running really doesn't help us with the stock heads, considering they really don't flow much more at .550" lift vs .500" lift. As you mentioned earlier, the performance difference between these two cams really does require running ported and/or better flowing heads.
Last edited by 97 6SPEED Z; Apr 15, 2008 at 01:49 PM.
The cam isnt really that much bigger than yours 6 degrees all the way around with the same lift. That not huge to me, I bought this cam while looking for a 503 but got a good deal.
i hope to have some times soon after i get mine back up and runnin....im thinking bout changin some stuff now tho.....NSA roller rockers n guide plates, bigger stall, bigger throttle body, suspension
Last edited by 1badasZ; Apr 15, 2008 at 08:03 PM. Reason: left out something
Thats all I was saying. Why go with a bigger cam if you are going to stick with stock heads? I plan on going bigger ones I go to ported heads.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



