LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

230/236 cam track #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #16  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
You 230/236 guys need to step it up. I made my 12.32 @ 114 pass with 3.42gears and 245 Nittos. I don't see how I am so close with a smaller cam.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 01:54 PM
  #17  
Chuckels's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 92
From: Savage, MD
Originally Posted by buzz12586
You 230/236 guys need to step it up. I made my 12.32 @ 114 pass with 3.42gears and 245 Nittos. I don't see how I am so close with a smaller cam.
I'm not done...There will be an 11.xx pass from the car!
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 06:27 AM
  #18  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Chucklet,

Well done my good sir. Very well done.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 12:47 PM
  #19  
97 6SPEED Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 857
From: Washington, Michigan USA
Smile

Originally Posted by buzz12586
You 230/236 guys need to step it up. I made my 12.32 @ 114 pass with 3.42gears and 245 Nittos. I don't see how I am so close with a smaller cam.
Buzz12586, I'm going to venture an honest guess at answering this. Since we're talking about 6 speed cars here, what was your short time on that 12.32 pass? I ran my 12.210 on a 1.88 60' time. I'm just guessing(?) that the 114 vs 115.4 mph trap speed differences are the clue here.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #20  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
1.88 60ft on my 12.32 pass.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #21  
camaro81's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 319
From: Apex, NC USA
1.601 60' on my 12.15 run, on the 10 bolt & stock suspension with a 230/236 cam

Did you spin at all on that 12.2 run? With more gear, suspension work and a 6 speed I would think it'd be quicker than 1.7's with no wheel spin. I know at MIR I was cutting 1.71's with my stock LT1 with just a converter and 3.73's.

Have you tried running at MIR yet? I don't know how good or bad Capital Raceway is, but if you cut 1.7's there with your mods, I'd be willing to bet you could get your 11 second pass at MIR no problem, along with your 1.6 60'

Last edited by camaro81; Apr 15, 2008 at 01:50 PM.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #22  
97 6SPEED Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 857
From: Washington, Michigan USA
Thumbs up

Buzz, this really makes the comparison easy then.

With your cam you ran the "back" (i.e. 1320' - 60' = 1260'), 1260 feet of the 1/4 mile in 10.44 (i.e. 12.32 - 1.88), seconds, and accelerated to 114 mph in the process; while I went 10.33 in the last 1260 feet and topped out at 115.42 mph.

This sounds pretty much right "on target" considering the cam duration differences. Remember the added lift we're running really doesn't help us with the stock heads, considering they really don't flow much more at .550" lift vs .500" lift. As you mentioned earlier, the performance difference between these two cams really does require running ported and/or better flowing heads.

Last edited by 97 6SPEED Z; Apr 15, 2008 at 01:49 PM.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #23  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Thats all I was saying. Why go with a bigger cam if you are going to stick with stock heads? I plan on going bigger ones I go to ported heads.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #24  
Chuckels's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 92
From: Savage, MD
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Thats all I was saying. Why go with a bigger cam if you are going to stick with stock heads? I plan on going bigger ones I go to ported heads.
The cam isnt really that much bigger than yours 6 degrees all the way around with the same lift. That not huge to me, I bought this cam while looking for a 503 but got a good deal.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #25  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Chuckels
The cam isnt really that much bigger than yours 6 degrees all the way around with the same lift.
are you saying there's not a huge difference between a 230/236 and a 236/242?
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #26  
1badasZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 870
From: Florence Mississippi
i hope to have some times soon after i get mine back up and runnin....im thinking bout changin some stuff now tho.....NSA roller rockers n guide plates, bigger stall, bigger throttle body, suspension

Last edited by 1badasZ; Apr 15, 2008 at 08:03 PM. Reason: left out something
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #27  
camaro81's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 319
From: Apex, NC USA
Thats all I was saying. Why go with a bigger cam if you are going to stick with stock heads? I plan on going bigger ones I go to ported heads.
What's wrong with having room to grow? The extra lift/duration doesn't hurt you unless your launching at 1500rpms
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
1
May 25, 2016 08:10 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
Mar 13, 2016 03:39 PM
Feffman
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
4
Oct 9, 2015 05:42 AM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
slocody
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Feb 10, 2003 01:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.