New Dyno with H/C's
07-19-2003, 11:15 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: akron/canton, ohio
Posts: 325
lol, ya that torque is pretty far off. no offense intended. i wouldnt waste my time on a dynojet if i were you...all they are going to give you is inflated numbers...nothing more. mustang dyno's dyno lower, but they dyno accurately. that 353rwhp is (or is at least extremely close to) what you are actually making. dont let dyno numbers fool you...they essentially mean nothing. go out and run your car at the track and then run it against a 350rwhp dynojet car. youll see what i mean.
07-23-2003, 10:56 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: North Canton, OH
Posts: 1,764
My car made 359 on a dynojet...#'s in sig @ I figure 3650 lbs.
About tq's and flashing with high tq #'s, that is what you get at the track. No one in their right mind would ever lock the tq from the line right, so those #'s are correct.
About tq's and flashing with high tq #'s, that is what you get at the track. No one in their right mind would ever lock the tq from the line right, so those #'s are correct.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
09-07-2015 10:56 AM