Dyno results with and w/o air filter
Re: Dyno results with and w/o air filter
Here is a website of a very interesting test a guy did on several different air filter. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest1.htm
Re: Dyno results with and w/o air filter
Yes, we've all seen that website. Very accurate measuring instruments too... a slice of filter, and a white fabric pad behind it. Very scientific.
Also, judging by that website, it would seem all filters suck equally.
As long as you're catching large debris (pieces of grass, insects, small rocks, etc) the filter is working. Miniscule dust particles that pass through filters will be burned up or trapped in the oil and flushed out during an oil change.
Also, judging by that website, it would seem all filters suck equally.
As long as you're catching large debris (pieces of grass, insects, small rocks, etc) the filter is working. Miniscule dust particles that pass through filters will be burned up or trapped in the oil and flushed out during an oil change.
Last edited by BirchMan98z; Dec 13, 2004 at 05:10 AM.
Re: Dyno results with and w/o air filter
Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
... As long as you're catching large debris (pieces of grass, insects, small rocks, etc) the filter is working. ...
You are certainly not going to do it regularly on the street. And at the track, you will suck in enough large debris to reduce any potential benifits to be gained.
Tried once when I was still stock, saw no improvement and my MAF screen was imbedded with seed and sand grains ... can only imagine what got through.
Re: Dyno results with and w/o air filter
A LOT of people run w/o air filters at the tack. If you are sucking up that much seed/sand at the track, something is wrong.
Also, isn't that the point of dyno'ing, to get every last ounce of HP out of your engine?
Also, isn't that the point of dyno'ing, to get every last ounce of HP out of your engine?
Re: Dyno results with and w/o air filter
Originally Posted by BamaZ28
A LOT of people run w/o air filters at the tack.
Running without a filter on a carbed car makes sense. Where the intake is 30 to 40 inches off the ground.
But f-bodies are essentially bottom feeders in a stock configuration, drawing air about 10 inches from the ground and then directing it very efficiently directly to the intake. Then most of the induction modification that is done to f-bodies push the air intake that much closer to the ground ... ie FRA, FTRA, SSRA, etc ...
Like I said I've done it, and saw no difference.
Originally Posted by BamaZ28
If you are sucking up that much seed/sand at the track, something is wrong.
Originally Posted by BamaZ28
Also, isn't that the point of dyno'ing, to get every last ounce of HP out of your engine?
Inflate your rear tires to at least 45 lbs ... good for a couple ponies, more if you can get a set of light weight wheels for the rear.
Then use a short belt, bypassing the steering pump, alternator and pull the A/C belt ... that's another 5 ponies and generally more. ... I actually race this way, but I don't bother to dyno this way. It doesn't change the parameters of the tune.
Last edited by V6toZ28; Dec 13, 2004 at 09:58 PM.
Re: Dyno results with and w/o air filter
I dynoed a Fram vs. a K&N and there was no difference in power. However, the K&N didn't filter as well, so I tossed it. I NEVER run without a filter...it's cheap insurance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darth_tsunami
V6 Tech
6
Sep 18, 2015 01:57 AM



