C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally posted by mark896
One thing I do envy about the vette, and no one has mentioned, is true dual exhaust. Straight from the engine. I wish I had that...
One thing I do envy about the vette, and no one has mentioned, is true dual exhaust. Straight from the engine. I wish I had that...
i agree, if all your looking for is more power then buying a vette is stupid. but honestly, is there any one person who has bought a vette over a camaro for the minor hp difference? not likely, it's for the other advantages.
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
i always thought that the SS 35th anniv ed. perform ed had 380HP and that its = was the Black Bird that also has 380HP....i just might not know what im talkin bout but GMMG builds the Black Bird i know and thought that they built the perform. ed 35th SS too, i mean they have them on the site as well as at their office, this i know beacuse i go their about once a week as its only 15 min from my work and one my buddies in my car club works there. but maybe i dunno much of nothin.....
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
GMMG had nothing to do w/the 35th Ann SS. Its rated @ 345 IIRC due to the SLP catback and lid. The Camaro equivalent of the Blackbird would be ones like the Bergers etc. Also GMMG built.
To the SS bashers, there is more to an SS than an appearance package. I've driven both and the SS definately handles better.
The WS6 and SS's also hold their values much better. Nothing against Z's and Formulas the power is the same, the SS just had the options, looks, and handling I wanted in a package deal at a great price. Cheaper than I could have gotten an equivalently optioned Z and then added the appearance stuff. I bought used so that makes a difference.
Vettes underrated? Not a chance. Just like the GTO is not under rated at 350hp with the same basic power train as the 01-02 f-body that was rated @ 310- 325 . I've seen 2 stock GTOs dyno and they were both in the 290s for whp.
To the SS bashers, there is more to an SS than an appearance package. I've driven both and the SS definately handles better.
The WS6 and SS's also hold their values much better. Nothing against Z's and Formulas the power is the same, the SS just had the options, looks, and handling I wanted in a package deal at a great price. Cheaper than I could have gotten an equivalently optioned Z and then added the appearance stuff. I bought used so that makes a difference.Vettes underrated? Not a chance. Just like the GTO is not under rated at 350hp with the same basic power train as the 01-02 f-body that was rated @ 310- 325 . I've seen 2 stock GTOs dyno and they were both in the 290s for whp.
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
vette might have a ls1 just like my formula....but you can bet that in a few years, you'll be seeing a new c6 zo6 parked next to the bird. have any of you had a chance to go look @ one in person? the dealer down the road just got a black c6 last week. i tried to test drive it, but it wasnt happening
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally Posted by afterimage ss
getting off subject... how much horse power do z06's push out to the wheels, lol

345-355rwhp usually.. fully stock..
Last edited by psychocabbage; Sep 4, 2004 at 02:04 PM.
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
The Corvette version of the LS1 did get a slightly different cam and have dual exhaust, but anything gained is lost (and more) by the IRS and rear transaxle. Usually F-bodies will dyno a little higher at the wheels. The Corvette will be a touch faster on average due to weight and cD... My $.02
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally Posted by afterimage ss
only reason vettes are faster is because they're lighter than the f-body...
2003 Corvette C5 - 3,246 lbs.
2002 Camaro Z28 - 3,433 lbs.
not extremely faster... there's a 187 lbs difference, but it's still lighter than a camaro... not by 20 lbs, but by, we'll... i guess it would be even if you stuck a fat *** in the passenger seat, lol
my friend in a 2001 camaro ss gave the chop to a 2002 c5. something.... c5 had exhaust, camaro had ram air lid and exhaust.
my friend in his rx-7 (twin turbo - stock) took a c5 by a car, and he ran 14 flat at moroso (he cant take off out of the whole because of something to do w/ his apex seals, so he had to take off slow... then he hit it
)
i <3 camaros... hehe
2003 Corvette C5 - 3,246 lbs.
2002 Camaro Z28 - 3,433 lbs.
not extremely faster... there's a 187 lbs difference, but it's still lighter than a camaro... not by 20 lbs, but by, we'll... i guess it would be even if you stuck a fat *** in the passenger seat, lol
my friend in a 2001 camaro ss gave the chop to a 2002 c5. something.... c5 had exhaust, camaro had ram air lid and exhaust.
my friend in his rx-7 (twin turbo - stock) took a c5 by a car, and he ran 14 flat at moroso (he cant take off out of the whole because of something to do w/ his apex seals, so he had to take off slow... then he hit it
)i <3 camaros... hehe
As far as vettes go , I agree its about the same HP numbers fro both cars . I outran 3 of them at the track when Mt TA was stock . 2 auto's one stick . The one with the six speed had a Pitaful driver so things probably woulda been different had the car had a Decent driver behind the wheel .
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally Posted by danziger
The Corvette will be a touch faster on average due to weight and cD... My $.02
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally Posted by stik6shift98
ya but were sayin its a waste to spend at least 15k more on a vette when all your lookin for is power....vettes are totally over rated
VETTE = OVER RATED
VETTE = OVER RATED

Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally Posted by Greed4Speed
To the SS bashers, there is more to an SS than an appearance package. I've driven both and the SS definately handles better.
The WS6 and SS's also hold their values much better. Nothing against Z's and Formulas the power is the same, the SS just had the options, looks, and handling I wanted in a package deal at a great price. Cheaper than I could have gotten an equivalently optioned Z and then added the appearance stuff. I bought used so that makes a difference.
The WS6 and SS's also hold their values much better. Nothing against Z's and Formulas the power is the same, the SS just had the options, looks, and handling I wanted in a package deal at a great price. Cheaper than I could have gotten an equivalently optioned Z and then added the appearance stuff. I bought used so that makes a difference.
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally Posted by danziger
The Corvette version of the LS1 did get a slightly different cam and have dual exhaust, but anything gained is lost (and more) by the IRS and rear transaxle. Usually F-bodies will dyno a little higher at the wheels. The Corvette will be a touch faster on average due to weight and cD... My $.02
Sure you weren't thinking of the LT1 which I have heard the Vettes got the 4 bolt Main block, and a slightly better Cam, etc.
Please let Us know where the info on the cam came from.
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???
Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
lol last time I checked, the sticker on ss/ws6 cars actually SAYS "appearance package."
), and the A4s also came with the 3.23's instead of the standard 2.73 in the Z w/the 2.73. Again, this is NOT appearance related. 
Notice I didn't say it wasn't an appearance package, just that there was more to it.
Ya, the Z's could get better tires (although still 16") and better gearing (as an A4) option, but the SS/WS6 had them standard. Didn't some Z's come with steel driveshafts instead of Al also?
So, you were saying?
Last edited by Greed4Speed; Sep 5, 2004 at 08:31 PM.


