LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2003 | 02:37 AM
  #31  
mark896's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 309
From: Ft. Rucker, AL
One thing I do envy about the vette, and no one has mentioned, is true dual exhaust. Straight from the engine. I wish I had that...
Old Jan 4, 2003 | 02:52 AM
  #32  
stik6shift98's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,254
From: Darien, IL, usa (Chicago W.Suburbs)
Originally posted by mark896
One thing I do envy about the vette, and no one has mentioned, is true dual exhaust. Straight from the engine. I wish I had that...
you can its probably like 200 bucks....which is less than a catback
Old Jan 4, 2003 | 03:09 AM
  #33  
mark896's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 309
From: Ft. Rucker, AL
You have to sacrifice ground clearance on f-bodies. I wanted GM to MAKE space on the undercarriage to fit 2 pipes all the way back. I'll live though.
Old Jan 5, 2003 | 07:50 PM
  #34  
chevy qc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 250
From: michigan
i agree, if all your looking for is more power then buying a vette is stupid. but honestly, is there any one person who has bought a vette over a camaro for the minor hp difference? not likely, it's for the other advantages.
Old Sep 2, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #35  
ssoulcainls6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17
From: Winder, GA
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

i always thought that the SS 35th anniv ed. perform ed had 380HP and that its = was the Black Bird that also has 380HP....i just might not know what im talkin bout but GMMG builds the Black Bird i know and thought that they built the perform. ed 35th SS too, i mean they have them on the site as well as at their office, this i know beacuse i go their about once a week as its only 15 min from my work and one my buddies in my car club works there. but maybe i dunno much of nothin.....
Old Sep 2, 2004 | 09:38 PM
  #36  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

GMMG had nothing to do w/the 35th Ann SS. Its rated @ 345 IIRC due to the SLP catback and lid. The Camaro equivalent of the Blackbird would be ones like the Bergers etc. Also GMMG built.

To the SS bashers, there is more to an SS than an appearance package. I've driven both and the SS definately handles better. The WS6 and SS's also hold their values much better. Nothing against Z's and Formulas the power is the same, the SS just had the options, looks, and handling I wanted in a package deal at a great price. Cheaper than I could have gotten an equivalently optioned Z and then added the appearance stuff. I bought used so that makes a difference.

Vettes underrated? Not a chance. Just like the GTO is not under rated at 350hp with the same basic power train as the 01-02 f-body that was rated @ 310- 325 . I've seen 2 stock GTOs dyno and they were both in the 290s for whp.
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #37  
red96taA4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 199
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

vette might have a ls1 just like my formula....but you can bet that in a few years, you'll be seeing a new c6 zo6 parked next to the bird. have any of you had a chance to go look @ one in person? the dealer down the road just got a black c6 last week. i tried to test drive it, but it wasnt happening
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #38  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,901
From: Houston, Tx USA
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Originally Posted by afterimage ss
getting off subject... how much horse power do z06's push out to the wheels, lol

345-355rwhp usually.. fully stock..

Last edited by psychocabbage; Sep 4, 2004 at 02:04 PM.
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 08:44 AM
  #39  
danziger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 501
From: Chesapeake, VA USA
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

The Corvette version of the LS1 did get a slightly different cam and have dual exhaust, but anything gained is lost (and more) by the IRS and rear transaxle. Usually F-bodies will dyno a little higher at the wheels. The Corvette will be a touch faster on average due to weight and cD... My $.02
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #40  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Originally Posted by afterimage ss
only reason vettes are faster is because they're lighter than the f-body...

2003 Corvette C5 - 3,246 lbs.
2002 Camaro Z28 - 3,433 lbs.

not extremely faster... there's a 187 lbs difference, but it's still lighter than a camaro... not by 20 lbs, but by, we'll... i guess it would be even if you stuck a fat *** in the passenger seat, lol

my friend in a 2001 camaro ss gave the chop to a 2002 c5. something.... c5 had exhaust, camaro had ram air lid and exhaust.

my friend in his rx-7 (twin turbo - stock) took a c5 by a car, and he ran 14 flat at moroso (he cant take off out of the whole because of something to do w/ his apex seals, so he had to take off slow... then he hit it )

i <3 camaros... hehe
A stock RX7 TT ? Those cars are not faster then C5's..If He won that race it was due to the drivers .
As far as vettes go , I agree its about the same HP numbers fro both cars . I outran 3 of them at the track when Mt TA was stock . 2 auto's one stick . The one with the six speed had a Pitaful driver so things probably woulda been different had the car had a Decent driver behind the wheel .
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 02:09 PM
  #41  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Originally Posted by danziger
The Corvette will be a touch faster on average due to weight and cD... My $.02
Raced several, they are no faster. They all saw my tailights, except a cammed one.
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #42  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Originally Posted by stik6shift98
ya but were sayin its a waste to spend at least 15k more on a vette when all your lookin for is power....vettes are totally over rated

VETTE = OVER RATED
are you saying that because you can't afford one? lol And, let's not forget, a z06 is only a few grand more expensive than a c5. Is that overrated too?
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #43  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Originally Posted by Greed4Speed
To the SS bashers, there is more to an SS than an appearance package. I've driven both and the SS definately handles better. The WS6 and SS's also hold their values much better. Nothing against Z's and Formulas the power is the same, the SS just had the options, looks, and handling I wanted in a package deal at a great price. Cheaper than I could have gotten an equivalently optioned Z and then added the appearance stuff. I bought used so that makes a difference.
lol last time I checked, the sticker on ss/ws6 cars actually SAYS "appearance package."
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 06:07 PM
  #44  
Kris93/95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
From: Bentonville, AR
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Originally Posted by danziger
The Corvette version of the LS1 did get a slightly different cam and have dual exhaust, but anything gained is lost (and more) by the IRS and rear transaxle. Usually F-bodies will dyno a little higher at the wheels. The Corvette will be a touch faster on average due to weight and cD... My $.02
Interesting: I have never heard this. All anyone has ever attributed power differences, I have heard of, was due to the better air box/intake, and better exhaust.

Sure you weren't thinking of the LT1 which I have heard the Vettes got the 4 bolt Main block, and a slightly better Cam, etc.

Please let Us know where the info on the cam came from.
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #45  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: C5 power under-rated like F-body???

Originally Posted by BirchMan98z
lol last time I checked, the sticker on ss/ws6 cars actually SAYS "appearance package."
And since when has a short throw shifter such as the Hurst unit in the SS been an appearance only thing? Like I said, there is more to it. 17" wheels not only look better, but make them handle better too. Not to mention standard Z rated tires allowing higher top speeds (no governer ), and the A4s also came with the 3.23's instead of the standard 2.73 in the Z w/the 2.73. Again, this is NOT appearance related.

Notice I didn't say it wasn't an appearance package, just that there was more to it.

Ya, the Z's could get better tires (although still 16") and better gearing (as an A4) option, but the SS/WS6 had them standard. Didn't some Z's come with steel driveshafts instead of Al also?

So, you were saying?

Last edited by Greed4Speed; Sep 5, 2004 at 08:31 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.