11.2-1 OK with 93 pump gas? P/V clear?
#1
11.2-1 OK with 93 pump gas? P/V clear?
Dart 205's on the way . I am looking to mill them .020, use GM MLS gaskets and install the F14. I have been told that the compression ratio will be close to 11.2-1. Will 93 octane pump gas be OK with this set-up?
One more question, will piston to valve clearence be an issue? Thanks
One more question, will piston to valve clearence be an issue? Thanks
#3
Re: 11.2-1 OK with 93 pump gas? P/V clear?
Would love to know the numbers once you get the set up complete, please post the results. I am thinking about the Darts not sure just yet. Hopefully your numbers will persuade me to buy them!
#4
Re: 11.2-1 OK with 93 pump gas? P/V clear?
Originally Posted by MonkeyBoneSS
Would love to know the numbers once you get the set up complete, please post the results. I am thinking about the Darts not sure just yet. Hopefully your numbers will persuade me to buy them!
#5
Re: 11.2-1 OK with 93 pump gas? P/V clear?
It's going to depend on the tuning ... my set up is 10.9 to 1 with a moderate cam ... the difference between a tune on 91 - that's all we get here in CA - or 100 racing gas is about 15 rhwp.
If I run the 100 octane tune on 91, it sounds like someone dropping a bag of marbles on hood.
If you're serious about getting the maximum power for the track; either get LS1 Edit so you can down load your 100 octane tune for the track or get a second PCM with your race tune and swap them out for the track.
If I run the 100 octane tune on 91, it sounds like someone dropping a bag of marbles on hood.
If you're serious about getting the maximum power for the track; either get LS1 Edit so you can down load your 100 octane tune for the track or get a second PCM with your race tune and swap them out for the track.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Magenta_Hearts
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
6
03-22-2015 03:36 PM
Magenta_Hearts
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
03-05-2015 07:01 AM
dmaastr
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
07-01-2002 02:22 PM