General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 03:31 PM
  #121  
BlackMamba's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 25
From: Upland CA
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

i have to use the cupholder in the passenger door. I had to drink accidents using the center console one. I'm 6'5 so fortunately i can actially reach it while i'm driving.
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 07:43 PM
  #122  
SABLT194's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 766
From: GARDNERS,PA
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

Power window motors blow and replacing them even blows more!
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 08:14 PM
  #123  
pearlpurple's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 519
From: Talbott, TN
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

Originally Posted by shoebox
The worst flaw is that you like to drive it so much that you will put up with petty annoyances and call them "features". You smile every time you put your right foot on the floor, zoom around an expressway ramp or twisty mountain curve and would rather listen to the exhaust note than turn on the stereo. I enjoy my "flawed" car.
Once again the info you provide is most accurate!!
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #124  
dnz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 771
From: Houston Tx
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

i have zero complants if you dont like something change it. thats what after market is for. well i guess i have a few complaints my car shakes back and forth like a getto butty, and my body tend to twist when the wheels lift off the ground. other than that zero complaints.
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #125  
80TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 724
From: Regina,Sask,Canada
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

I have had a 96 ta,97 taws6 and now 96 z28 vert and also still have a 99 taws6.

Things don't like about my fourth gens.Window motors are weak crap.Opticrap is stupidest thing I have ever seen.Under water pump,how freakin retarded are these gm engineers.Rear end is joke and belongs in 100 hp s10 truck.come to think of it thats where its from.Should have been minimum 10 bolt 8.5 like my 80 ta.
The cat hump is pretty stupid but I am not a passenger very often so really don't care about that..its not my problem.
The engine being under the cowl does make it a pain to work on but guess that gives it the front rear balance for good handling and you have to sacrifice some things for styling.
Other things..lt1 brakes are pretty lame compared to ls1 brakes.Pop up headlight gears are cheap crap plastic.Interior is cheap and will scratch easily.Ford makes great tough plastic interiors.Not that I am a ford fan.
People complain its low and doors are big..a price we pay for styling.They are great looking cars.
Engines seem pretty reliable,trannies not too bad so far.Actually all my f bodies have been very good reliability wise.I like the fact most panels on the car are not metal.Unfortunate they made the back quarters metal so they stil get dents from doors and the dents on top of back quarters is stupid and I put subframe connectors on my cars some from day one and they still have them.
Another complaint it subframe design.They need subfame connectors.
They do rattle and squeak quite a bit but the vette I drove the other day a 98 wasn't so great either.
They handle pretty good,ride not too bad aside from the rattles and mainly they look good,go fast and are fun to play with.

Now I do have sort of an import too.92 eagle talon awd turbo.Its big fun,gets great traction,looks pretty cool and as for reliability well you pretty much need to buy two or them and parts can be very pricey on import stuff.When warranty is gone you better hope its a common car and even then you could be in shellshock when you see the price of things we get for relatively cheap from gm.They call the mits dealers satan on the dsm talon boards and porche or other import parts can be crazy bucks too.
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #126  
Ellis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 89
From: Lake Worth, FL
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

Originally Posted by 95 Silver TA
They should have ...never put the optispark under the water pump a regular distributor would have been better ...
Can you imagine how pissed we'd all be if they put a rear mouted distributor in there?

Envision having to drop the engine to pull a distributor...There'd be folks foaming at the mouth.

As for the cupholders, the center one on M6s is a joke, but my formy has the flip out passenger one too. That's the one I stow my very mandatory travel mug of morning coffee in.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 12:10 AM
  #127  
S.J.S.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,201
From: HI.
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

I've never had so much laughs reading a thread before. You all are right on the money but I wouldn't trade her for anything.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 12:36 AM
  #128  
ponyackn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 990
From: Sac to SoCal
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

It was probably already mentioned but I'll have to add this one to my list...
The wonderful plastic retainer that holds the leather shifter bag in place because it's so fragile.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #129  
QUASARBLUEZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 245
From: Berkeley Spgs, WVA
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

I'd have to say the cup holder. I mean, whats up with that?
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 09:38 AM
  #130  
JohnD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 450
From: Austin, TX. USA
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

I've taken the transmission out enough times that it is becoming an art form for me. I put 2 ea. 2 x 4 boards on top of a piece of plywood with a space big enough between them for the seam in the transmission to slip into. A rachet strap goes over the trans and under the board to hold it. This gives a flat surface to sit on the floor jack which it does nicely and safely. The second thing I found out was that a 1/4" drive swivel socket will get that top bell housing bolt with no problems. Get a good one that they will replace if you break it. The third thing was that the allignment tool for the clutch disk isn't nearly accurate enough. With the tool in place, align the disk by feel with your fingers before final tighten on the pressure plate. You will find this is about 1/4" closer and will end your alignment woes. I personally prefer a swivel extension in the middle of that 3' socket extension but it isn't really necessary. I love that car. humps, dents, opti and all. I just scanned it again last weekend and it hasn't even thrown a temporary code in 2 years.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 10:16 AM
  #131  
izzyz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 618
From: Chicago burbs
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

After hearing about the rear quarter dings, I got to thinking. At my community college we had a 97 30th anniversary Camaro as one of the "shop" cars. Now most of these cars were donated because they had flood damage or other problems, but the camaro seemed perfect. I asked one of the instructors why we had the Camaro, and he said that there was a problem with the rear quarters. Apparently the stamping process had a flaw in it, and the quarters were dented. I went outside and looked, and asure enough one of the quarters had a large, shallow dent in it. You had to be looking for it to see it, but it was definately there. I have a feeling this was a widespread problem. Maybe some of the sheetmetal was too thin, or the stamping dies were screwed up. I don't know the exact cause, but I believe many cars slipped through quality control, and possibly later on down the road developed problems. Just my .02.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 10:33 AM
  #132  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Talking Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

Originally Posted by shoebox
The worst flaw is that you like to drive it so much that you will put up with petty annoyances and call them "features". You smile every time you put your right foot on the floor, zoom around an expressway ramp or twisty mountain curve and would rather listen to the exhaust note than turn on the stereo. I enjoy my "flawed" car.
Me too.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #133  
Cody's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 101
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

everyone complains about the optispark, but I deleted mine and installed a hei distributor so now rather than being able to service it from the front I have to drop the engine out because its 6" under the windsheild. Although the pluses do out weigh the negatives, and I hope the go completely tubular on the front end this winter.
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #134  
dogboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 195
From: Orlando,Fl,USA
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

94 opti
hump in floor
water in from open windows when spraying window washer & its aimed at window/door latch electronics
Rear hatch water residual when opening, (future rust)
weak & noisy rear end
cheap door motors
spark plug access
small front brake rotors (93-97)
Battery should be in trunk (8 cyl)
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 11:07 PM
  #135  
Perrytna's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 30
Re: The Worst Design Flaw in a Camaro!!

Battery should be in trunk (8 cyl)

Takes 18 feet of 4 gauge cable Pretty easy to do



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.