General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

Fly wheel Horse power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 05:17 PM
  #1  
NASCR46's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 251
From: Bartlett Il
Fly wheel Horse power

If rear wheel HP is 341.What is the approx Fly wheel Hp? Car has A/t Thanks
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #2  
ReNxWar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 655
From: 08088, 27215
Originally Posted by NASCR46
If rear wheel HP is 341.What is the approx Fly wheel Hp? Car has A/t Thanks
15% drivetrain loss, so 392HP give/take.
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #3  
WestCoast96Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 669
From: San Jose, CA
I'll give you another 9hp over that.

fwhp = (rwhp) / (1 - %loss) = (rwhp) / (1 - .15)

So 341 rwhp is around 401 fwhp, if you assume 15% loss.

It's not exactly the 115% x rwhp = fwhp that most people calculate. Either Injuneer or Shoebox had a pretty clear explanation of fwhp vs. rwhp.
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #4  
teke184's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 8,319
From: US 1 Mile Marker 52 in the Florida Keys
auto trans is higher % loss than a manual...

so it is car specific to an extent
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #5  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
No way to know for sure, but what was posted will put you in the ballpark. There are different kinds of chassis dynos and different kinds of engine dynos. Each can be used in a variety of ways. For example, engine dynos can use a variety of "sweep rates" - the rate at which the engine is allowed to accelerate. Even this small difference (300 v. 600rpm/sec., for example) will change the measured power output. Also, correction factors are typically used to compensate for differences in air density. The CF used can drastically change the reported power output. AFAIK, there is no "gold standard" - the measurement method needs to be specified to make best use of the data.

It is a matter of debate which method best correlates with performance, which is what really counts after all. One thing we do know is that it's "area under the curve" within the usable rev range that counts more than peak hp/torque. Also, the rev range is important - power developed higher up allows the use of shorter gears and more torque delievered to the wheels.

Rich
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #6  
LSWHO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
From: Az
If that's true then how are stock autos able to dyno in the 135-145 range!? That's a tad high don't you think?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
cobrakilling101
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
14
Mar 17, 2015 10:42 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 17, 2014 02:50 PM
XtremeLt1
Car Audio and Electronics
12
Sep 13, 2002 08:50 PM
dmaastr
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Jul 1, 2002 02:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.