Went to the dyno and got these results
Re: Went to the dyno and got these results
Originally Posted by engineermike
I respectfully disagree. There is very little difference between the LT1 and LT4 intake. They both suck. Plus, the early '93-'95 LT1 intakes actually have larger ports than LT4. If you don't believe me, compare the two side-by-side and you'll be surprised when you find that you can't tell them apart aside from the red paint. Neither will go 295 cfm, by the way. Stock, they will not go over ~260 and ported you might see 275 cfm.
I know I'm too nice, I didn't really want to start an arguement.
Re: Went to the dyno and got these results
Back to the original question. . . you don't mention what sort of cat-back/ muffler you're using. I've seen FlowSmasher and Spintech really kill horsepower, to the tune of 30 - 40 rwhp loss even in the 3" and 3.5" sizes. The most recent that I've had to add to that list is Borla. Would you believe that a 3" Borla just robbed 100 rwhp from my buddy's combination. That's not a misprint. 100 rwhp by removing the Borla cat-back. It went from 420 rwhp to 520 rwhp just by removing the exhaust.
Re: Went to the dyno and got these results
Originally Posted by engineermike
Back to the original question. . . you don't mention what sort of cat-back/ muffler you're using. I've seen FlowSmasher and Spintech really kill horsepower, to the tune of 30 - 40 rwhp loss even in the 3" and 3.5" sizes. The most recent that I've had to add to that list is Borla. Would you believe that a 3" Borla just robbed 100 rwhp from my buddy's combination. That's not a misprint. 100 rwhp by removing the Borla cat-back. It went from 420 rwhp to 520 rwhp just by removing the exhaust.
Re: Went to the dyno and got these results
Originally Posted by MEAN LT1
a wide open borla should not take away so much...
Re: Went to the dyno and got these results
So what do you guys think the idler pulley on the supercharger being froze and the dyno having a 4.10 input instead of a 3.73 cost me my extra horsepower that i am looking for.
And I have a borla catback with the cutout side blocked off with a 1/2" hole drilled in the plate to cut down noise. The FlP headers i am using the straight pipe instead of the cat's.
And I have a borla catback with the cutout side blocked off with a 1/2" hole drilled in the plate to cut down noise. The FlP headers i am using the straight pipe instead of the cat's.
Re: Went to the dyno and got these results
As long as the belt wasn't slipping (10 psi) the idler won't change it much. Maybe 10 hp.
The dyno measures horsepower at the tire, then calculates torque based on gear ratio. That could effect the torque readings but not hp. Dynojet will give a hp versus speed curve if you don't hook up the spark pickup. If you do hook up the spark pickup, it will calculate the gear ratio for you.
Try removing the Borla plate on the dyno. If it picks up power, I highly recommend Hooker's Aerochamber.
The dyno measures horsepower at the tire, then calculates torque based on gear ratio. That could effect the torque readings but not hp. Dynojet will give a hp versus speed curve if you don't hook up the spark pickup. If you do hook up the spark pickup, it will calculate the gear ratio for you.
Try removing the Borla plate on the dyno. If it picks up power, I highly recommend Hooker's Aerochamber.
Re: Went to the dyno and got these results
On the boost number, 15# pullies will usually only give 10-12 on a 383. The boost/pulley ratio is calculated on a 350, so larger motors will see less. A more efficient motor will show less boost for the same HP also, and boost is more a measurement of restriction than anything.
Your IAT numbers look real good also.
Your IAT numbers look real good also.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM



