Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Schurters LT1 Vortech Hard intake setup. Pics inside...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #1  
roguedriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
Schurters LT1 Vortech Hard intake setup. Pics inside...

Here's some pics of a hard intake pipe i put together for my Vortech T-trim using SchurtersLT1's intake elbow he made along with 2 90 degree bends he sent me. It's 4" all the way from the charger intake to the filter (with the exception i still have my MAF down there) and it fits in there like a glove. Clears the steering joint, steering rack boot and sway bar. It was tight aroung the boot, but just barely clears with some silcone coupler manipulation at the charger intake. Used 2 4" straight silcone couplers front and back of the sway bar, a 3.75 to 4" reducer coupling at the charger and a 3.5 to 4" reducer at the MAF. I decided to keep it split in front and rear of the sway bar for ease of removal (and it does make it a lot easier). If i welded it, i'd weld it at the split on the front of the sway bar. Keep in mind, this setup is with a BMR K-member, so their may be a little more space right near the eblow. Don't know if Schurters LT1 mocked it up on a stock K-member car or not. I mocked it up to get a place to weld in 2 bungs for a PCV fitting and a bypass valve fitting. Haven't driven it yet to see what kind of boost i've picked up, but i'm sure it flows a lot better then the stock Vortech 3.5" dryer hose setup! Let me know what you guys think. If your looking for one, SchurtersLT1 can probably set you up.

http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256111
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256110
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256109
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256108
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256107
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256106
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256105
http://www.putfile.com/pic.php?img=4256104

Ken R.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #2  
RealQuick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,645
From: Bridgewater, MA
NIce!
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
:d :d :d :d
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 05:38 PM
  #4  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
whats the point of a 4 inch pipe when the maf is 3.5 inches and the blower inlet is 3.75?
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #5  
roguedriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
I know, but it's a hell of an improvement in flow over vortech's stock setup. And since i'm still working on a better setup for moving the MAF up top without causing surging, it has to stay down low. At one point with my s-trim, i had run the stock vortech intake setup without the dryer hose and used another style of 3.5" rubber hose and picked up a pound of boost just by getting that out of there. I agree, it's not at max efficency, but sucking air through a 3" section of 3.5" diameter tube (the MAF) is probably a lot easier then trying to suck air through a little over 2 feet of 3.5" tubing with part of it being dryer hose. I'll put it through it's paces tonight and see what i pick up and then post it. Even if i just picked up a pound, it will be worth it.

Ken R.

Last edited by roguedriver; Dec 15, 2006 at 06:39 PM.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #6  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
Originally Posted by cjmatt
whats the point of a 4 inch pipe when the maf is 3.5 inches and the blower inlet is 3.75?

getting as much air to the blower as you can.....1-2 lbs of boost could mean 30 rwhp.....is that worth it....
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 11:49 PM
  #7  
roguedriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
Well, results are in. Just got back from a quick flogging session. I had to do a double take on the boost gauge, but it picked up almost 4lbs of boost with the intake swap. The original setup must have been choking the daylights out of that T-trim because previous to the swap, i'd barely push over 10psi with the T-trim at 6k and now it's pushing almost 14psi at 6k. Glad i took out a few deg of timing and added some extra fuel in the tune in anticipation of an increase. May be a dyno day tomorrow cause now i'm curious.

Ken R.
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 03:50 AM
  #8  
JWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 288
great improvement! I'm looking to doing the same with my procharger. I'm currently using a powerdyne 3.5" hard inlet for my 90 which has to be better than the crappy dryer hose. Good job!
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 05:32 AM
  #9  
RealQuick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,645
From: Bridgewater, MA
Nice gains!!
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 09:52 AM
  #10  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
Originally Posted by roguedriver
Well, results are in. Just got back from a quick flogging session. I had to do a double take on the boost gauge, but it picked up almost 4lbs of boost with the intake swap. The original setup must have been choking the daylights out of that T-trim because previous to the swap, i'd barely push over 10psi with the T-trim at 6k and now it's pushing almost 14psi at 6k. Glad i took out a few deg of timing and added some extra fuel in the tune in anticipation of an increase. May be a dyno day tomorrow cause now i'm curious.

Ken R.
nice Ken .....that car is going to become a monster...........sick gains
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #11  
ZBLKHELLRZR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 972
From: The Haven, Fl
Originally Posted by JWS6
great improvement! I'm looking to doing the same with my procharger. I'm currently using a powerdyne 3.5" hard inlet for my 90 which has to be better than the crappy dryer hose. Good job!
What's wrong w/ dryer hose? I've got 4" dryer hose that I can stand on that doesn't crush under my weight. I'm 155 but that's impressive to me so if I can't crush it then I suppose it won't collapse either under pressure.
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 07:01 PM
  #12  
roguedriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,194
From: Albuquerque, NM.
Well, find and fix one problem, find another. The T-trim upgrade along with the 4" intake is making so much power now that i was running out of fuel pump on the dyno today. Had to shut it down at 5400rpm and it was only making around 13psi at that point. Oh well, looks like twin in tank 255's are coming....

Ken R.
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 09:11 AM
  #13  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
Originally Posted by roguedriver
Well, find and fix one problem, find another. The T-trim upgrade along with the 4" intake is making so much power now that i was running out of fuel pump on the dyno today. Had to shut it down at 5400rpm and it was only making around 13psi at that point. Oh well, looks like twin in tank 255's are coming....

Ken R.

that is sick
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #14  
CALL911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,225
From: IN
Anyone seen the difference this makes between the stock inlet tube and schurtersLT1 metal one on a Procharger D1SC?
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 04:14 PM
  #15  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
I don;t have one on a procharger as of right now.....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
4
Jun 23, 2016 08:42 PM
onefastgta
Parts For Sale
7
Mar 19, 2015 10:10 AM
GhostZ28
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
12
Dec 7, 2014 11:53 PM
sleeperZ96BT
Car Audio and Electronics
3
Jul 28, 2002 01:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.