TS-230XL 230/242 duration, .544"/.576", 114lsa

I'll probably have it ground on a 116lsa instead of the 114lsa.

How much more power do you think the 116lsa will have over the 114lsa?

 

It will likely make a few less hp but have better manners with the 116lsa vs. the 114.

Rich

 

What rpm do you think the cam will peak at with 190cc LT1 fully ported heads?

I really don't want to take the motor past 6500 rpm. Would this cam be a better choice: TS-227XR 227/239 duration, .560"/.577", 114lsa

Will either of these two cams make more than the low lift 224/236 114lsa cam?

 

The two cams are quite close but I prefer the shorter duratio/higher lift combination if you are willing to run enough spring to handle the more aggressive lobes. I would expect a peak lower than 6,500, so no worries there.

Rich

 

Ground on a 116lsa, i suspect 6000-6200rpm peak...

 

Thank you for the answers.

Will these two cams make more power than the low lift 224/235 114lsa cam?

 

Rich, the 227/239 cam mentioned above. How would the power compare to the high lift version of the 224/236 cam?

 

Again, these are all going to be pretty similar. The high lift XE lobes need a lot of spring and such, most peple are going to be better off with the lower lift lobes. Are you willing to invest in a good set of springs, pushrods, and titanium retainers?

Rich

 

Will CC918's handle either one of those cams?

 

absolutely

 

I think 116 lsa is too wide.. 114 or 115 would be my choice..

 

Thanks Justno. Well that's one thing taken care of. Now to figure out the rest.

 

My 4th cam. Cammotion... 231/240 I/E with .538/ .558 I/E on 110 deg and 114 LSA. From Cam motion. I like the high rpm cam. 3K to 6.5k range. I'm running with afr 190's and the hydra rev kit. The hydra rev helps control valve float @ 6K+ rpm. Not that bad @ idle 1100rpm. I did notice better breating as my manifold boost pressure dropped. Thinking of spinning the ati faster (3.4 pulley) due to lower pressure.