Drag Racing Technique Improve your track times

2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
sw89lt1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 235
From: oklahoma
2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

i ran a 14.6 at 97 mph with a 2.6 60' time. i'm wandering what i could run if i could get it to hook good enough for a 2.0 60'. i heard a tenth off our 60' = 2 thenths off you et is that correct?
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #2  
Stephen 87 IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,037
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500' elevation
Re: 2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

I had my truck out on the weekend. MPH on 4 runs was almost identical so it was making the same amount of HP each time. Traction was a problem though.

60' ---- 1/4 mile
2.166 - 15.041
2.282 - 15.154
2.453 - 15.376
2.432 - 15.376

All 4 runs were from 89.27 to 89.8 mph. If it wasn't for the wheel spin with the street tires, all the runs should have been 15.0x. For some reason the first pass in mid morning was the best for me.
Old May 25, 2005 | 12:01 PM
  #3  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Re: 2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

I doubt you'd gain 1.2 seconds. Maybe a bit less than one full second.

Rich
Old May 25, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #4  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,115
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: 2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

I always use 1.5X as a "rule of thumb", but it seems like its a lot more variable than that. 1.5 x 0.6 = 0.9, so sort of agrees with Rich's experience.
Old May 25, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #5  
TedH's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,664
From: Brunswick, Maine 04011
Re: 2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

My best complete guess would be 0.8...
Old May 25, 2005 | 03:26 PM
  #6  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
Re: 2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

I'm with Injuneer...9/10.
Old May 25, 2005 | 09:23 PM
  #7  
sw89lt1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 235
From: oklahoma
Re: 2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

thanks guys.
Old May 26, 2005 | 01:16 AM
  #8  
LS1_03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 695
From: Hennepin, Illinois
Re: 2.6 60' vs a 2.0 60' time

The difference can be pretty big. I would definitely say about .9 or so.

Couple weekends ago I was hitting 1.7x 60's all day and running 13.3x all day. On one run I spun to a 2.0 60' and ran a 13.9x. So 60' means a lot.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Feffman
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
4
Oct 9, 2015 05:42 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Feb 1, 2015 08:26 AM
capebuf
Cars For Sale
0
Jan 13, 2015 07:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.