Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Speed density theory and 2 bar tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #1  
engineermike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Speed density theory and 2 bar tune

I've been reading alot about how Speed Density works. Basically, it uses the ideal gas law to calculate the density of the air going into the cylinder:

density = Pressure / R / Temperature

where:
Pressure is linearly proportional to the voltage from the MAP sensor
R is the ideal gas constant
Temperature is measured by the IAT sensor

Then, since not all the air is trapped in the cylinder, the computer multiplies "density" by VE%, which is programmed into a table. Note that the density equation and R are not accessible or adjustable. The computer then calculates the injector pulse-width required to reach the desired A/F ratio.

Now, assume the MAF is disconnected and the closed loop is disabled. If you were to simply replace the 1 bar MAP sensor with a 2 bar, then you would have half the voltage for any given pressure. Half the voltage means that the density formula will yield half the actual density and the computer will supply half the fuel (also adjusted by VE, so it will actually be less than half). So, to fix this situation, you half the injector constant, which doubles the pulse width, then condense the VE table to the left half.

I understand that there are some other tables that are affected, but could it be this simple to get the motor running reasonably well?

Mod's, sorry for the double post.

Mike

Last edited by engineermike; Dec 5, 2006 at 10:04 PM.
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #2  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Mike,
I am not up to speed on the factory computer but with a Fast,which is speed density there were no problems tuning it.
Are ya tring to get the same results with a factory computer on the cheep?
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 12:36 PM
  #3  
engineermike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
I'm trying to avoid:
- the expense of a stand-alone.
- hacking up the harness.
- having to run 2 computers (stock for gauges, hvac, security, etc.)

If I go aftermarket, it will be MSII.
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #4  
96TurboTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 647
From: Brockton, Ma
Interesting topic. This would also be helpful to those who still run on the street and need the OBDII tests for inspection.
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
BeaversTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 258
From: FT WORTH,TX
I belive his has been brought up in the pcm section. Alvin has been doing this on the 93's for a few years now.
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #6  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Originally Posted by engineermike
I'm trying to avoid:
- the expense of a stand-alone.
- hacking up the harness.
- having to run 2 computers (stock for gauges, hvac, security, etc.)

If I go aftermarket, it will be MSII.
I totally understand.
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #7  
INTMD8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
Originally Posted by 96TurboTA
Interesting topic. This would also be helpful to those who still run on the street and need the OBDII tests for inspection.
That can still be accomplished with a piggybacked aftermarket ECU.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 07:20 AM
  #8  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
yes you can, and it works been doing it for years.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 08:21 AM
  #9  
96TurboTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 647
From: Brockton, Ma
Originally Posted by INTMD8
That can still be accomplished with a piggybacked aftermarket ECU.
No doubt it can.
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #10  
INTMD8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
Originally Posted by 96TurboTA
No doubt it can.


Just throwing it out there. I thought by your post that you assumed you were out of luck with OBD2 emissions testing if you went to an aftermarket ecu.
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #11  
96TurboTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 647
From: Brockton, Ma
Originally Posted by INTMD8


Just throwing it out there. I thought by your post that you assumed you were out of luck with OBD2 emissions testing if you went to an aftermarket ecu.
Ya, I didn't really think about it. Did you ever run your car on the stock PCM, or did you go to the BS3 from the start?
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 12:08 AM
  #12  
jetjoe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 30
Can we get more details about piggybacking an aftermarket ECU and sucessfully passing an OBD 2 emission scan type test?
Thanks.
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #13  
jetjoe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 30
Anybody?
Old Dec 23, 2007 | 08:34 PM
  #14  
Eric Bazan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 263
From: Albuquerque, NM USA 5300 ft elevation
Originally Posted by engineermike
Now, assume the MAF is disconnected and the closed loop is disabled. If you were to simply replace the 1 bar MAP sensor with a 2 bar, then you would have half the voltage for any given pressure. Half the voltage means that the density formula will yield half the actual density and the computer will supply half the fuel (also adjusted by VE, so it will actually be less than half). So, to fix this situation, you half the injector constant, which doubles the pulse width, then condense the VE table to the left half.
Mike

So, when you speak of cutting the injector constant in half, do you mean if I am running 42# injectors I would enter a value for @21# injectors? I noticed in your tune you sent me to check out that your value was for ~30#/hr. I know you have to be running a much larger injector, correct?

I hope Im not coming across as retarded, but Im new to this whole tuning area. Sorry if this is a dumb question.

Eric Bazan

Last edited by Eric Bazan; Dec 23, 2007 at 08:49 PM.
Old Dec 23, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #15  
engineermike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by Eric Bazan
So, when you speak of cutting the injector constant in half, do you mean if I am running 42# injectors I would enter a value for @21# injectors? I noticed in your tune you sent me to check out that your value was for ~30#/hr. I know you have to be running a much larger injector, correct?
Yes, I am running 84's. I really should have a 42 lb injector constant, but his is how I got the tune from dookie and it worked relatively well so I left it that way. My VE numbers are pretty low, so putting in a higher injector constant would mean I would need more conventional higher VE numbers.

Mike
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.