Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

MAF Readings Peaked

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2004, 03:39 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tommy'Z 6speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC USA
Posts: 96
MAF Readings Peaked

I've logged my car with both Freescan and DataMaster and it max's out the MAF (255 Gr/Sec) on both at around 5000 RPM. Is this normal for a mild motor like mine?

Max value displayed was 267 Gr/Sec at about 5400 RPM. If you assume an AFR of 12:1 and a BSFC of .5, that's about 350 HP. Sounds a bit high to me.

Thanks!
Tommy'Z 6speed is offline  
Old 10-21-2004, 05:29 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
SABLT194's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: GARDNERS,PA
Posts: 766
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

Very unlikely to peg your MAF on an NA car.

Steve
SABLT194 is offline  
Old 10-21-2004, 07:38 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
jonota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 299
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

What do you mean, maxed out? The max MAF g/sec reading that I was aware of was 512. Also, it is common for ported MAFs to read incorrectly unless they are recalibrated. Has yours been ported?

Jonota
jonota is offline  
Old 10-21-2004, 09:25 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
95Blackhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,277
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

The no's sound a bit high, but not out of common bounds. If you are running beyond 200 g/sec, then you are in PE mode anyway. The only thing that matters at that point is making sure your PE AFR is good in this range.
95Blackhawk is offline  
Old 10-23-2004, 08:13 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tommy'Z 6speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC USA
Posts: 96
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

I also thought the LT1 MAFs were perhaps 512 GPS but my LT1 ScanMaster stops at 255 and I think 255 is the range in TunerCat tables also.

I don't understand : "If you are running beyond 200 g/sec, then you are in PE mode anyway."

Doesn't the MAF still respond as an increase in Frequency/GPS in the PE mode? I know it's not used for fueling (perhaps that's what you meant) but it still indicates an increase in airflow.
Tommy'Z 6speed is offline  
Old 10-23-2004, 08:49 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
jonota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 299
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

In tunercat, the max allowed value in the tables is 512. I believe with the stock calibration, the highest stock value is in the mid 400's. What do you mean, these aren't used in PE mode? It is the only way that the engine knows how much air is coming in (unless you think it uses IAT and VE tables?), and it uses the air to make the intended AFR...

Jonota
jonota is offline  
Old 10-23-2004, 09:26 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
madwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DeKalb, IL
Posts: 4,577
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

The "guesstimate" used for guessing horsepower based on the AFGS reading is AFGS*1.1 for rear wheel horsepower, logged on the street and provided you are naturally aspirated and your MAF is stock. (non ported, and screened)

So with a value of 267, the result is 293.7 which sounds just about right for your setup.

While a value over 255 may be over scanmaster's display range, the MAF does not max out at 255.
madwolf is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 02:53 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tommy'Z 6speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC USA
Posts: 96
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

Madwolf - OK. I wasn't sure if 255 was the MAF's max or just the Scanmaster max.
It just seems to stall at 254.xx GPS for several hundred RPM. I would expect it to increase in a somewhat linear fashion.

I converted GPS to Lb. per Hr. and used an assumed BSFC of .5 and an AFR of 12:1 to calculate fuel used in Lb.per Hr. This will give flywheel horsepower.

Jonota - I didn't mean to imply the MAF wasn't used, I was just trying to figure out what Blackhawk meant when he said " you are in PE mode anyway".

BTW, maf is stock, unported. I may have removed the screen, can't remember!
Tommy'Z 6speed is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 11:44 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
95Blackhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,277
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

Originally Posted by Tommy'Z 6speed
Jonota - I didn't mean to imply the MAF wasn't used, I was just trying to figure out what Blackhawk meant when he said " you are in PE mode anyway".

Maybe I should have read your post a bit slower. You had MAF and AFR, in my mind, related to each other. Looking again, I guess you did not imply this.

Thinking about it, I may have had a beer or two that night also...
95Blackhawk is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 03:33 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
1982z28with18s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mission, Kansas
Posts: 1,743
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

Originally Posted by madwolf
The "guesstimate" used for guessing horsepower based on the AFGS reading is AFGS*1.1 for rear wheel horsepower, logged on the street and provided you are naturally aspirated and your MAF is stock. (non ported, and screened)
Thats awesome if thats the case, when I was datalogging the 383 it was hitting 370ish all before 6,000rpms. I'll compare my rwhp dyno chassis #'s to the "guestimate" by looking at my old logs on the old setup(thats in the sig).
1982z28with18s is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 09:35 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
madwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DeKalb, IL
Posts: 4,577
Re: MAF Readings Peaked

Originally Posted by 1982z28with18s
Thats awesome if thats the case, when I was datalogging the 383 it was hitting 370ish all before 6,000rpms. I'll compare my rwhp dyno chassis #'s to the "guestimate" by looking at my old logs on the old setup(thats in the sig).
If I were to guess, you will probably not see more than 385-390 at the very most on a dyno. Joe's cams work a little different, especially in automatics. They don't make crazy power on the dyno, but they kick *** on the track. I've tuned a convertible A4 and it only put down 385 RWHP but it trapped at 117 just like yours. With your 60', he'd probably have a better time than yours. Of course, he has a slightly bigger Joe O cam. but still a convertible!
madwolf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
12-01-2016 05:37 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
R@mpage
New Member Introduction
2
04-20-2015 10:02 AM
z28projects4ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
07-16-2002 07:48 PM



Quick Reply: MAF Readings Peaked



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.