Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Help with WOT fuel mixture

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 11:16 PM
  #1  
WadeC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 15
From: Houston,Tx. US
Unhappy Help with WOT fuel mixture

My O2s are reading 980 on both banks all through WOT. I think that 890- 900 millivolts is where they should be. What determines the fuel mixture at WOT? Is it the MAF? I have heard that hte O2s dont effect the WOT mixture. I hate running this rich, please help.
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:04 AM
  #2  
dayusmc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 154
From: Stationed at Camp Lejeune, N.C. (But Going Home SOON!)- From New Jersey
Open Loop

At WOT the car is in open loop and does not use the O2 sensors. Is your car running rich or lean at patial trottle? There are some tables that the car uses to get the A/F ratio at WOT. Tell me witch way your car is running and we can go from there. I won't be back on the board until 9 o'clock EST tonigt(Putting Nitrous in today) but I will help you than.
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 09:28 AM
  #3  
LWM's Avatar
LWM
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 324
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
You can adjust the fuel at WOT with the PE table (Power Enrichment). If you have a stock fuel map, you will notice that it calls for quite a bit of fuel at around 5,000 rpm ... better safe than sorry.

When you are adjusting the PE table, you should be on a dyno with a wide band O2 sensor, it will get you better results than by going off the MilliVolts from your cars O2 sensors.

On the wide band, I believe for a normally aspirated car you should be shooting for a 12.8 to 1 A/F ratio ... thats just a vague recollection ... anyone else??

Hope this helps

LWM
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 03:03 PM
  #4  
stevil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 295
From: Columbus, Ohio
Originally posted by LWM
When you are adjusting the PE table, you should be on a dyno with a wide band O2 sensor, it will get you better results than by going off the MilliVolts from your cars O2 sensors.
Yeah, I kept lowering my A/F ratio at the track, making a pass logging with Freescan, and then saw that my O2s didn't change a bit. I kept doing that and finally gave up/got scared...
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 07:05 PM
  #5  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by LWM
You can adjust the fuel at WOT with the PE table (Power Enrichment). If you have a stock fuel map, you will notice that it calls for quite a bit of fuel at around 5,000 rpm ... better safe than sorry.

When you are adjusting the PE table, you should be on a dyno with a wide band O2 sensor, it will get you better results than by going off the MilliVolts from your cars O2 sensors.

On the wide band, I believe for a normally aspirated car you should be shooting for a 12.8 to 1 A/F ratio ... thats just a vague recollection ... anyone else??

Hope this helps

LWM
LWM,

I like your assessment of the 12.8 ratio and I understand from all my other readings that that is in line.

However, I was around 12.6 (looking at PE vs temp and PE vs RPM tables). When I moved it to about 12.2, I actually got 20 HP from that move. I think that from all my reading that this is too rich in PE mode. However, my DataMaster Dyno is really helpful and I find it to be accurate on a comparison basis from one run to another.

LWM, anyone...is 12.2 a bit rich? If so, why am I making more power?

Ben
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 11:13 PM
  #6  
LWM's Avatar
LWM
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 324
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Take the 20 hp and call it a day ...

In my case ... I saw an increase of 50 HP going from an AF ratio of 10.4:1 to and AF of 11.4:1 ... that's where I called it quits ... I don't see any gain in buying a new engine before I want to. ...

The boys at the shop were wanting me to go to a smaller ring ... leaner mixture ... but ... I didn't feel lucky ...

So ... is 12.2 a bit rich ... yes perhaps, but not overly so, you may have avoided some preignition with the richer mixture ... and dyno runs can and do vary a few percentage points.

Did the computer take out any timing?

All I can say is keep the AF ratio in the 12's and that is "good enough for government work"

Hope this helps

LWM
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 11:24 PM
  #7  
Dan K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,009
From: so close I can taste it...
I've heard that 13:1 is what you want to shoot for most of the time but that LT1's seem to make the most power at a safe 12.2-12.3 to 1 A/F ratios.
Anyone have any other opinions?
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 08:57 AM
  #8  
carl97ss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 41
From: indlps,in
Smile

my experience w/ two modded LT1's. first was a heads, cam exhaust ect motor. going from 11.7:1 to 12.5:1 (wideband on a dyno) jumped RWHP from 323 to 347. no gains by going leaner. FYI...the factory O2's at WOT read 920 to 930mv before and after the dyno tune(Auto Tap scanner). with my current bored and stroked LT1 we went from 14.2:1 (yah, a little lean) to 12.6:1. rwhp went from 380 to 405. 13.1:1 got us 400 rwhp. factory O2's at WOT were the same 930mv before and after the dyno tune!!

Last edited by carl97ss; Oct 15, 2002 at 07:55 AM.
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 10:06 PM
  #9  
bigtwink's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19
From: Houston, TX
How do you add or subtract fuel with LT1 edit?
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 11:11 AM
  #10  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
As has been said, you cannot use lambda (factory type) O2 sensors to fine tune your AF ratio.

In terms of the optimum AF ratio most NA cars do best somewhere in the 13.0-13.5 range. The exact number depends on the specific combo. Depending on the test conditions (density altitude) you may want to be on the rich side of optimum to give a safety margin. If the density altitude is low (low temp, high barometric pressure, low humidity) when you test the AF will go leaner when the density altitiude is higher (hotter, more humid, lower barometric pressure).

At the dyno shop where I help out with tuning we usually start at ~12.5:1 for supercharged cars. Same cautions apply but more so: a little rich costs just a few hp, a little lean can break parts.

Rich Krause
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kallcium
V6 Tech
3
Oct 7, 2015 03:39 PM
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Apr 10, 2015 10:03 AM
jayblev95
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Jan 20, 2015 01:30 PM
taner
Midwest
5
Aug 21, 2002 09:49 AM
DETROIT_AREA_00_SS
Midwest
7
Aug 12, 2002 11:32 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.