Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Could some look at my freescan log??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #16  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
Originally Posted by dookie454
Sorry WS6T3RR0R, individual cylinder fuel trims in his file are STOCK.

STOCK per GM.

Also, STOCK GM takes the Individual FUel Trims OUT above 14.8% TPS.

BOTH SETTINGS ARE STOCK FROM GM!!

I didnt check the rest of his settings but now I have a feeling alot of them are close to stock as well, not "jacked" in any way.


I call it as I see it, that info is plain wrong.
The 14% tps is stock yes thats what I said by stating it only works up to 14% tps anyway. His fuel trims are not stock and all set to 1 off idle which is not what gm did.

I can send you stock f and b body files if you want, and I am sure if I looked hard enough I can even find a little lt1 file for you.
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #17  
flyinZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,290
From: IL
Im glad I stumbled onto this thread. I've been wanting to start datalogging myself, but the two programs that I have dont seem to work,(Datamaste/Freescan) for some reason. Can either of you guys help?

I've got a similar setup(94'z28, 383 HR, M6/McLeod Street Twin, OBD1 ), and Im on a MO tune as well(Ed Wright).

How's your driveability with your setup?

Last edited by flyinZ; Aug 1, 2009 at 02:18 PM.
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #18  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by flyinZ
Im glad I stumbled onto this thread. I've been wanting to start datalogging myself, but the two programs that I have dont seem to work,(Datamaste/Freescan) for some reason. Can either of you guys help?

I've got a similar setup(see sig), and Im on a MO tune as well(Ed Wright).

How's your driveability with your setup?
Might want to add a little basic info about the car - year, model, engine (including year and PCM info), tranny. Why not include this info in your "signature".

Appears you have an OBD-1 PCM, as a minimum, since both those scan programs are for OBD-1.
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 02:18 PM
  #19  
flyinZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,290
From: IL
Adjusted, thanks Fred
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #20  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
Originally Posted by flyinZ
Adjusted, thanks Fred
Who's cable and what kind (serial or usb)?
What operating system?
What sort of a problem are you having exactly?
Does the computer recognize the cable and then nothing in the program or what?
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #21  
flyinZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,290
From: IL
Its a USB cable from AKM. The system I have tried, was Datamaster and it was recognizing the cable. I found the problem, fixed it with the correct driver. Then, it couldnt find the PCM..Fixed that problem, now the program itself isn't working correctly..Says something about runtime error, or some crap like that.
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #22  
RobsWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 466
From: Diamondhead, MS
Originally Posted by WS6T3RROR
The 14% tps is stock yes thats what I said by stating it only works up to 14% tps anyway. His fuel trims are not stock and all set to 1 off idle which is not what gm did.

I can send you stock f and b body files if you want, and I am sure if I looked hard enough I can even find a little lt1 file for you.
Every 94 stock tune I have has off idle set to 1. So GM did do that. 95 was not set to 1.
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 04:59 PM
  #23  
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,517
From: Engineerland
All the files I have are in fact 95's. I stopped collecting them after seeing they were all very much identical for the f cars.

Learn something new every day I guess. I wonder why they even had the table early on then if it was all set to 1. Wonder if they changed later to meet some tougher emissions testing.
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #24  
RobsWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 466
From: Diamondhead, MS
Good question. Maybe because 94 was the first to use cyl balance? I really don't know.
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #25  
sbs's Avatar
sbs
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,154
From: VA
My stock 94 bin is not like that. Nor are any of the other stock 94 vette bins I've got.

Looking at the 'stock' bins on Franker's site, none of the 94 Y or B bins are like that, while some of the 94 F bins are, and some aren't.

Strange...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Novo
Forced Induction
45
Jun 14, 2016 02:58 AM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
fift5
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Oct 1, 2015 10:31 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 18, 2015 03:46 PM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.