Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: Is Z284ever Rationally or irrationally Zeta-bashing?
He is legitimately concerned over the apparent course Zeta will take Camaro
39
59.09%
He is irrationally doomsdaying based on what he perceives Zeta to be, which may or may not be true.
27
40.91%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #46  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
I might be wrong about this, but if I'm a GM marketing guy, knowing how tough the coupe market has been, I am going to throw a temper tantrum if corporate wants to give me two Chevy rear drive v8 mid sized coupes. It makes no sense.
Yes they will be different,but will they be different enough to both sell in adequate quantities?
Yup, you have to make the case for two Chevy coupes. Tough, but not impossible.

If we can have a Beta Camaro by 08 that would be great. I don't see how its possible given how long its taken to make the case for Zeta and how long it took SSR and others to reach production. We keep daydreaming of GM streamlining its processes and it never happens. 2008 MY is a little under 4 yrs away. Is it realistic to expect beta to be ready by then?
Once approved, this one would go fast.....and be cost effective. The plant capacity is waiting for it. Design, nearly finished. Powertrain, done. Suspension, developed.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #47  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

There's a difference between "making the case" and that case being an actual sound business decision.

From the article posted yesterday on the year's supply of SSR's, it was said that ASC, one of the key suppliers, was instrumental in making the business case and selling that case to GM.

Their case was obviously overly optimistic. The 4th gen case was the same deal, look how that turned out. Just because you make the case doesn't make it a smart move.

Can marketing sell corporate on a two-chevy-coupes case? Maybe, it will be tough, like you said.

Say that happens. Just because it is approved doesn't mean its sound. If its approved and both cars flop and die, how does that help you and me?

I'd rather Camaro stay dead than to die twice. This is a scenario in which passionate advocacy can make your rose colored glasses too rosey. We need to be realistic about what is sustainable, not just what is sellable to corporate.

If both flop, which one gets the axe? Zeta, whose Chevy variant will likely support the viability of all other divisions' Zeta variants, or a Beta Camaro, which would have no other GM NA siblings?
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 09:57 AM
  #48  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

One more thing....

Kappa needs a high volume (ie, NOT a roadster) Chevy variant to be viable. Otherwise, Solstice, Sky and the others, won't be around long.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 10:02 AM
  #49  
ced8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 576
From: Houston, TX
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by Z284ever

I say, call the Zeta coupe Monte Carlo.

The Beta coupe should be out about the same time.

Firstly I think the Zeta Coupe should be called anything but Camaro if the car isn't right to be a camaro. Chevelle isn't out of the question as is other various names. I do believe however that GM wants to throw the C name on there because the press will help market it. Granted we know it will get creamed for not being a proper successor and will dissapoint so many people that GM will be forced to kill it. i.e. your doomsday permanent hiatus scenario but that leaves me to my next q.

If Beta is a modified Kappa and is supposed to take up the slack for the remaining units (outside the 20K solstices/20K skys/other variant) then isn't the majority of the work already done and paid for?
If your assumption that it won't take much longer than Zeta means that something has to already be accomplished right? For example it took how long for kappa to get green lit before it actually hits the road? based on that info what kind of timeline are we looking at.

(also just a clarification... what exactly is Zeta's suspension that is making the car so heavy?-sorry if i'm asking a question that has already been asked I'm just worried about this and it is nawing at me...


EDIT: We seem to think alike.. I was typing all this while you were posting about Kappa...
(Great minds think alike????)

so if the coupe is piggybacking on the Kappa why isn't it okayed by upper management? isn't the price just re-tooling the factory and not the entire platform build?

Last edited by ced8; Dec 14, 2004 at 10:10 AM.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #50  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by redzed

The Camaro has always been a high performance 2+2, not some badge engineered 2-door sedan.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 12:37 PM
  #51  
TA76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 426
From: Birmingham, AL, USA
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

I gotta say Z284ever has won me over! Chevy had two coupes, MC and Camaro, just a couple of years ago... did they not?
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #52  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by TA76
I gotta say Z284ever has won me over! Chevy had two coupes, MC and Camaro, just a couple of years ago... did they not?
Yes but they were disticntly different

MC. more upright, sedan like, FWD, v6
Camaro. low slung, v8 RWD sports car basically.

A zeta and beta coupe pair would be MORE alike than those two were. More segment overlap, more same-showroom competition. Still doesn't make sense to me from a business perspective. If I'm that bean counter no way I'd approve that in today's marketplace.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #53  
dnovotny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 90
From: CA
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

As you'll see from my sig, I have a certain bias here. Call the Zeta whatever you want, but give Pontiac a true/real BMW fighter with a Beta based car that's named Firebird.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #54  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by ced8
(also just a clarification... what exactly is Zeta's suspension that is making the car so heavy?-sorry if i'm asking a question that has already been asked I'm just worried about this and it is nawing at me...
It's not really the suspension. The suspension we get won't be necessarilly heavy or light..... just cheapo maybe.

Because Zeta...like V-car... is an architecture that will be used on both sedans and coupes, it's structure require lots of different pieces. This adds weight and reduces rigidity. Not that it won't be rigid, but that rigidity will come at a greater weight penalty.



so if the coupe is piggybacking on the Kappa why isn't it okayed by upper management? isn't the price just re-tooling the factory and not the entire platform build?
Well, there's more to it than merely another version of Kappa. It is a substantially different architecture. It shares parts with Kappa...like suspension components....and uses a lower dominant hydroformed rail like Kappa, (and Y-car), and probably shares construction techniques. But it's different enough that someone's got to cough up the cash for further developement.

BTW, Holden has told the press that the Torana concept cost $3.5 million to build. Alot of money for Holden...considering they spent $30 million to develop and put into production the Monaro. But there are rumors floating around...that it wasn't only $3.5 million....it was way more. Hmmmmm....maybe that platform is more developed than we think.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #55  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
Yes but they were disticntly different

MC. more upright, sedan like, FWD, v6
Camaro. low slung, v8 RWD sports car basically.

A zeta and beta coupe pair would be MORE alike than those two were. More segment overlap, more same-showroom competition. Still doesn't make sense to me from a business perspective. If I'm that bean counter no way I'd approve that in today's marketplace.
There would be cross-over....no doubt about it. Just like Campell recently said that Cobalt and MC cross over into Mustang territory.

One needs to be positioned as a large, stylish, safe, comfy coupe...and the other as a smaller, sportier, racier coupe.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 02:33 PM
  #56  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

I agree completely, but can it work? Not "can a case be sold to the beancounters" but will it sell? Or will we be right back here again in 7-9 years?

How many coupes can Chevy sell? GM?

In a market supposedly deadly for coupes, we will have
Corvette
Camaro
Zeta Chevy
Cobalt
Solstice
Ion
GTO
Buick Zeta car
More kappa variants?
XLR

Seems like ton when compared to the other manufacturers. Ford has, what? The GT, Mustang and Focus? And one of those is extremely small production.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 03:26 PM
  #57  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

GM's a big company with lots of divisions.

Better some cross over at the Chevy dealer, than cross shopping at the Ford dealer.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 03:34 PM
  #58  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Forged aluminum, double wishbone control arms all around, coil over shocks/springs, rigid hydroformed rails, tidy exterior dimensions combined with roomy interior
I'd step on my own mother to get into a Z28 with those specifications....
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #59  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

I don't actually see anything wrong with having 2 coupes, Monte and Camaro. But aren't we talking 3 here?

THere is the Monte Carlo Zeta SP.
Then there is Chevy *Coupe* Zeta SP.
And now a Camaro Beta?

Chevy *Coupe* Zeta SP would have to be axed if Camaro was to arrive on Beta chassis. Are they willing to do it at this point? Especially that CONGOS clinic went so well...
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 04:00 PM
  #60  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Z284ever and Zeta-bashing Poll

Originally Posted by muckz
I don't actually see anything wrong with having 2 coupes, Monte and Camaro. But aren't we talking 3 here?

THere is the Monte Carlo Zeta SP.
Then there is Chevy *Coupe* Zeta SP.
And now a Camaro Beta?

Chevy *Coupe* Zeta SP would have to be axed if Camaro was to arrive on Beta chassis. Are they willing to do it at this point? Especially that CONGOS clinic went so well...

And don't forget Cobalt as well.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.