Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

When did Pontiac "Jump the Shark".

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2010 | 08:10 PM
  #106  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Originally Posted by :
No they haven't. That all started around '76-'77.
Well, ok, very similar engines, transmission etc. for most of my life
Point is, you could plug a 301 Pontiac intake port with your thumb. My 400 Firebird had me deep into Pontiac until they went to generic chevy motors.
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 01:22 AM
  #107  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Originally Posted by Jason E
I won't get into a long verbal diatribe about my love for Pontiac. Its been well, well documented on here. In my mind, yes...Pontiac died with the '04 re-design of the GP, the bland G6, and the bland GTO. My wife loves her Comp G...and so do I. But, its not a visually stirring vehicle, and the interior design is plain odd to me. Why do we own it? In black, its a decent looking car...and while it doesn't make me "see red" like the GXP did, it still stirs the soul. I can fry the tires with the ol' 3.8, and the Comp G suspension adds give the car a stable feel...albeit it pushes more than a GXP does.

My favorite FWD car ever remains the '97-'03 Grand Prix. Even today, a clean one still turns my head. Every owner I talk to loves them. My mother ordered a black '98 GT sedan new, followed by a green '01 GT sedan my sister still owns. I had an '01 GT coupe as a DD...I still miss it. I only sold it because I have a demo. Something tells me that if I'd never started here, I'd still own it...with about 150-180k on it now.

Nothing GM makes today has stirred the soul of myself, or my GM-loyal parents, the way that design did. If I got another job today, I'd be hard pressed to buy a GM product, to be honest. A base LS Camaro doesn't have/can't get a sunroof. A turbo/M6 Regal will likely cost too much. Nothing else appeals to me. I'd probably end up with an M6 Fusion Sport, to be honest...and that's not a car that's ever been on my radar before. I'm not even really crazy about it. But, if I want domestic, a manual tranny, a mid-size, what options do I have? I can't even get a damned 2 door anymore!! I could live with no stick if I could get a coupe! GM used to have TONS of coupes!! An Altima or Accord Coupe actually fits what I'd want...but that'll happen over my dead body.
That's very telling.

From one life long Pontiac owner and fan......you're not alone...GM has ALOT of making up to do for its 3rd best selling brand.

But I think we'll be happy in 4 years.

JUST SAYIN'

Last edited by Josh452; Feb 7, 2010 at 01:25 AM.
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 01:41 AM
  #108  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
Originally Posted by teal98
I don't see what you guys found so great about the previous GP. Neither the '97 nor the '04 were appealing to me, but of the two I liked '04 better. The late model GP GXP actually was a valiant attempt at a FWD sport sedan.
The GXP was an exception, IMO. But, like all other truly great GM cars, only about 37 people knew about it. The 97-03 GP was a better, more appealing car over all and it had an EXCELLENT marketing program.

IMO, GM's problem is 75% marketing and 25% product. heck, with the new products, I'd say it's 95% marketing. GM has some EXCELLENT vehicles, but they don't know how to effectively communicate that to people who need to know it.

I disagree with theses two. The GTO was defiantly a Pontiac, it just wasn't a GTO. It would have received less backlash if it was called Pontiac Monaro.

G8 was the most Pontiac car at Pontiac in 2008. RWD, bold styling, V8 options. Naming again hurt this great car. It needed to be called Grand Prix. This was the Grand Prix that Grand Prix fans had been waiting their whole lives for and then GM changed the name on them
I can see that and I would agree to an extent. But I still think the image conveyed by the cars was all wrong. Pontiac's image in the 90's might've been a bit over-the-top to some, but it was "Pontiac" nonetheless and that's what people knew and expected. But GM, in their typical whimsical nature, decided to try and change the image of the brand with horrible names and a $5 marketing budget and expected everything to work out okay. I guess some of those lessons with Oldsmobile weren't learned after all.

Maybe what killed Pontiac was the fact that its fans were so picky. I doubt people on the Camry boards went nuts over the 2002 redesign (which I considered less attractive than the 1997) model, and if they did, sales didn't tank because of it.
Certainly.

The vehicle that was going to save Pontiac was Solstice.....
But how?

How could a low volume roadster on an inflexible platform that had a questionable profit margin save GM's second largest division?

Re: Aztek. It certainly wasn't a good thing. But my logic is that we, as enthusiasts, were able to see past the ridiculousness of the Aztek. And it was we the enthusiasts that 'new' niche Pontiac was supposed to appeal to.

Nothing GM makes today has stirred the soul of myself, or my GM-loyal parents, the way that design did. If I got another job today, I'd be hard pressed to buy a GM product, to be honest. A base LS Camaro doesn't have/can't get a sunroof. A turbo/M6 Regal will likely cost too much. Nothing else appeals to me. I'd probably end up with an M6 Fusion Sport, to be honest...and that's not a car that's ever been on my radar before. I'm not even really crazy about it. But, if I want domestic, a manual tranny, a mid-size, what options do I have? I can't even get a damned 2 door anymore!! I could live with no stick if I could get a coupe! GM used to have TONS of coupes!! An Altima or Accord Coupe actually fits what I'd want...but that'll happen over my dead body.

I wish Buick and Chevy well...they have big, big shoes to fill for the sea of current Pontiac owners. Pontiac owners will be ok though...they can take solace in the driver's seat of their new Mazda 3 or 6, Nissan Altima or Maxima...

Nissan and Mazda are what Pontiac could've been.
I certainly feel your pain.

GM has a grand total of 3 cars that appeal to me right now. Camaro SS, Corvette and CTS-V. Out of that, I can afford one (Camaro SS) and it *STILL* would be a compromise. I love my Focus daily driver, and it's sad to say that I'd be hard pressed not to buy another Ford right now. The Aveo RS shows promise, as does the Regal GS. But I'm very worried that the RS will be toned down to the point that the appeal will be gone. And the Buick is a hard pill to swallow given the name (I know... I feel like such a horrible hypocrite saying that. But it does hold some merit)

Last edited by FUTURE_OF_GM; Feb 7, 2010 at 02:01 AM.
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #109  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
Originally Posted by 90rocz
Well, ok, very similar engines, transmission etc. for most of my life
Point is, you could plug a 301 Pontiac intake port with your thumb. My 400 Firebird had me deep into Pontiac until they went to generic chevy motors.

Not to be a d***head, but no, not even similar.

The engines of Pontiac, Oldsmobile, and Buick share NOTHING in common. The may have shared a few displacement numbers but then they shared a few displacements with Chevy as well.
All of GM's divisions had their own engine programs and they all operated independently of the others.

The transmissions in all of GM's vehicles were the same except for the bell housings.


But you are right. If you're younger than 33-35 years of age, then you won't remember the divisions having their own exclusive engines.

And you're right about the 301 (and 265) ports. They suck!!
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 11:09 PM
  #110  
krj-1168's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Okay - Personally I think Pontiac's downfall was brought about by 3 back to back terrible decisions on GM's part.

The First was dropping the Firebird/Trans Am from Pontiac's lineup in 2002. This was a car which help define the Pontiac Brand for 35 years.

The Second was selecting a very bland looking, low volume GTO to replace the Trans Am as Pontiac's Flagship.

The Third was using generic names like G5, G6, G8 to replace well-known Pontiac nameplates of Sunfire, Grand Am, & Grand Prix.

With lose of it's identifable nameplates - Pontiac basically lost it's brand Identity, and therefore was basically doomed. If GM hadn't done just one of these things to Pontiac it may have been a salvageable brand.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 01:01 AM
  #111  
Mich84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Originally Posted by Josh452
The vehicle that was going to save Pontiac was Solstice.....
A low-volume, niche car was going to save Pontiac?

Old Feb 10, 2010 | 01:01 AM
  #112  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by krj-1168
Okay - Personally I think Pontiac's downfall was brought about by 3 back to back terrible decisions on GM's part.

The First was dropping the Firebird/Trans Am from Pontiac's lineup in 2002. This was a car which help define the Pontiac Brand for 35 years.

The Second was selecting a very bland looking, low volume GTO to replace the Trans Am as Pontiac's Flagship.

The Third was using generic names like G5, G6, G8 to replace well-known Pontiac nameplates of Sunfire, Grand Am, & Grand Prix.

With lose of it's identifable nameplates - Pontiac basically lost it's brand Identity, and therefore was basically doomed. If GM hadn't done just one of these things to Pontiac it may have been a salvageable brand.
So if Pontiac hadn't introduced the GTO, it would have made a difference?
No way. Names like Sunfire and Grand Am had already been ruined. G5 and G6 may not have helped, but they didn't hurt. The first seeds of death for Pontiac were sewn in the late 70s, just as they were for Oldsmobile and Buick. Buick just happens to have gotten a reprieve, thanks to China.

The three cases you identify above were all symptoms, not causes.
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 01:54 AM
  #113  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Originally Posted by Mich84
A low-volume, niche car was going to save Pontiac?

Tell me why not, because I can tell you why it started to - and you haven't seen what was on "the horizon" thanks to the little architecture that could...Kappa and expanded to the "big brother" Zeta.

Or are you going to chump again and have nothing to back up your words?
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 11:30 AM
  #114  
Mich84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Originally Posted by Josh452
Tell me why not, because I can tell you why it started to - and you haven't seen what was on "the horizon" thanks to the little architecture that could...Kappa and expanded to the "big brother" Zeta.

Or are you going to chump again and have nothing to back up your words?
Haha...you didn't actually just tell someone else they don't have anything to back up their words...did you? I don't know if that's more amusing or ironic.

Anyhow, I told you why not in the first post: Low-volume and niche. You can opine all you want about what could've been/what was going to be, that doesn't change was the sales figures were.
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #115  
1965GP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 551
From: HOUSTON, TX
Pontiac is practically my religion. I remember we were out with some friends and one of them said that he couldn't believe I collected pontiacs- he couldn't think of a worse car to collect. All he knew were the Grand Am's and Bonevilles of the late 90's / early 90's.

I think Pontiac missed their opportunity when they did not capitolize on their history. Look at Dodge- sure they are not thriving but with the Challenger and Charger in retro paint that "looks" fast as hell it is more pontiac than anything Pontiac has made in the past 8 years.

I think Niche would have worked it is was Solstice, 2DR G8 and 4 dr G8.... maybe a pontiac cobalt SS

When we were in the market for a new car we looked at the G8 and to get one in a bright color (orange) you were looking at Sticker +. You could get a Charger Daytona for less money with more options and it looked more aggressive.

I still love pontiac- I am restoring a 25th anniv T/A right now. But no matter how many vanilla GM e-mails they send I will not buy another new GM product. As has been said before- there is nothing that excites me. I honestly think we bought our '04 GTO (which is a fantastic car) because it said GTO on it and it was the only opportunity that I would ever have to buy a new GTO.

If the '04 GTO had said regal on it I never would have considered it.

GM you will lose the pontiac faithful- quit sending stupid e-mails offering me $2000 off something I do not want
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 02:15 AM
  #116  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by 1965GP
Pontiac is practically my religion. I remember we were out with some friends and one of them said that he couldn't believe I collected pontiacs- he couldn't think of a worse car to collect. All he knew were the Grand Am's and Bonevilles of the late 90's / early 90's.

I think Pontiac missed their opportunity when they did not capitolize on their history. Look at Dodge- sure they are not thriving but with the Challenger and Charger in retro paint that "looks" fast as hell it is more pontiac than anything Pontiac has made in the past 8 years.
If not for the 300/Charger/Challenger, Chrysler might make only trucks/suvs.
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 07:02 AM
  #117  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Never liked pontiac, seemed like a Rednecks performance car "brand" to me and didn't even really have a halo "performance" car that could compete with the Corvette. Chevrolet was more of a performance division really.

Good riddens.
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 11:32 AM
  #118  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Around the time Bonneville, Grand Prix, Grand Am were let go, GTO whiffed, and Lutz labeled them damaged. Essentially, 2004?
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 12:59 PM
  #119  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
Never liked pontiac, seemed like a Rednecks performance car "brand" to me and didn't even really have a halo "performance" car that could compete with the Corvette. Chevrolet was more of a performance division really.

Good riddens.
If you don't mind my asking, how old are you?
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 01:58 PM
  #120  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
Never liked pontiac, seemed like a Rednecks performance car "brand" to me and didn't even really have a halo "performance" car that could compete with the Corvette. Chevrolet was more of a performance division really.

Good riddens.
You're kidding right?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.