Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Torana = bigger kappa!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #106  
SharpShooter_SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 766
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

originally posted by Darth Xed
I think it's over simplifying the matter by pinning it solely, or even the majority of it, on the fact that some may think the car was too big on exterior dimensions...
I wasn't really trying to pin down any of the varied reasons why Camaro ultimately failed in the marketplace. That has been dealt with extensively over the past 2+ years. I merely wanted to chime in on the notion that a GTO-sized Camaro is somehow a bad thing and that the status quo with what makes a Camaro a Camaro needs to be re-examined. That my point came across as so narrowly defined was not my intention.
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #107  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Fiero is not a pony car since it is only a 2-seater. Part of the pony car formula is 2+2 seating.
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #108  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Originally Posted by SGT Posaune
Fiero is not a pony car since it is only a 2-seater. Part of the pony car formula is 2+2 seating.

Fair enough... what does it qualify as then, though?
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #109  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Originally Posted by SharpShooter_SS
I wasn't really trying to pin down any of the varied reasons why Camaro ultimately failed in the marketplace. That has been dealt with extensively over the past 2+ years. I merely wanted to chime in on the notion that a GTO-sized Camaro is somehow a bad thing and that the status quo with what makes a Camaro a Camaro needs to be re-examined. That my point came across as so narrowly defined was not my intention.

That is fair too.

I just fear that more than a few people are hoping for a Civic-sized Camaro... and I just don't get that at all.
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 03:57 PM
  #110  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Originally Posted by Darth Xed
That is fair too.

I just fear that more than a few people are hoping for a Civic-sized Camaro... and I just don't get that at all.
Who has ever advocated a Civic sized Camaro?



If a Kappa derivitive is used....it will require a major tear up in front and in back. The result should be ponycar sized...not Civic sized.

Last edited by Z284ever; Sep 28, 2004 at 04:05 PM.
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #111  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Have any more details about the Torana surfaced? That may help clear a little of this up. How long until Sydney?
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #112  
crYnOid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 384
From: Australia
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

2 weeks I think
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 11:59 PM
  #113  
Magnum Force's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 578
From: N. Providence, RI
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

OK, i am totally lost!!

is this supposed to be the new basis for the next GTO, or what??
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 11:59 PM
  #114  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

With the way this Kappa Camaro idea is going, its deffinatly going to be the size of the G35 or 350Z. IMO...not the best idea.
Like someone said before...the idea of what a Camaro is, needs to be redefined and set up. The basic DNA must stay, but its size and lay out needs to be rethought and be brought into modern times.
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 12:55 PM
  #115  
SharpShooter_SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 766
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Regarding the Kappa Camaro idea. We can discuss this out the yingyang but confusion is starting to creep into this thread. Please remember that a couple of posts back, Guoin reiterated that Kappa is not being looked at as the basis for the Chevrolet Performance Coupe or as we like to think of it - Camaro; that Zeta is/was the platform for that vehicle. We haven't heard anything "official" (what's that?:-) to contradict that.
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 01:30 PM
  #116  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Originally Posted by SharpShooter_SS
Regarding the Kappa Camaro idea. We can discuss this out the yingyang but confusion is starting to creep into this thread. Please remember that a couple of posts back, Guoin reiterated that Kappa is not being looked at as the basis for the Chevrolet Performance Coupe or as we like to think of it - Camaro; that Zeta is/was the platform for that vehicle. We haven't heard anything "official" (what's that?:-) to contradict that.

Well, "officially", there is no Camaro. In fact, officially there isn't even a Chevy Coupe which isn't even called Camaro.

As far as this Kappa thing...there are some real rumblings. But as has already been reported..."it will be very loosely based on Kappa".

The issue with Zeta is..it's a large car architecture. Camaro needs a medium car architecture. Bob Lutz thinks it's good idea to create a new medium RWD architecture. Without a high volume Chevy, the Wilmington plant will be at 20-25% capacity. We're just connecting the dots.

Sydney can't come fast enough for me. We'll have huge pieces of the puzzle then.
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #117  
SharpShooter_SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 766
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Yes, I know that there is officially no Camaro program. But I don't recall hearing anything outside of this thread that Kappa - LWB or not, is a possible basis for the Chevrolet Performance Coupe - outside of a blurb in Popular Mechanics that said Chevrolet was possibly getting a version of the Solstice.

Everything I can recall seeing both here and on C&G suggests that Zeta is the platform for the coupe in question. There have been postings to the effect that Zeta is a flexible platform supporting multiple wheelbase configurations - ie. both large and intermediate car classes. Since Zeta is the successor to the Holden VY chassis than it is probably safe to assume that future iterations of the Commodore, Statesman, GTO et all will continue without significant changes ie. both short (intermediate) and long wheelbase options. The current GTO is already ponycar sized so whether or not Camaro is built on Zeta, as is likely with the GTO, an appropriate wheelbase/platform will essentially exist, will it not? Even if the GTO grows somewhat when it migrates to Zeta, I can't see it becoming a fullsize car.

After reading this thread I'm neither opposed to a Kappa based Camaro nor am I looking for an argument with anyone. The Kappa platform certainly sounds as if it could give rise to some seriously sporty cars. I do agree that the platform needs a high volume Chevy variant in order to really be viable. I am just a little concerned that the supposed debut of a possible Camaro rumored to be around '07 is pushed off even further because the possible car is shuffled from one platform to another when there is some evidence to suggest that development (on Zeta?) is already under way. I realize that there is a lot of if's here but... I hope you see my point.
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #118  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Well, "officially", there is no Camaro. In fact, officially there isn't even a Chevy Coupe which isn't even called Camaro.

...
Then what do you call GMX284? The program is a Chevy coupe and the leading cantidate is Camaro. The name won't be stuck on till it gets unveiled, but the Camaro is coming...and what a ride it will be.

Red I know you are reading this and I can't wait to read your book.
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #119  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Originally Posted by SharpShooter_SS
Everything I can recall seeing both here and on C&G suggests that Zeta is the platform for the coupe in question.
That is correct. Until now.


There have been postings to the effect that Zeta is a flexible platform supporting multiple wheelbase configurations - ie. both large and intermediate car classes.
Maybe it's not as flexible as advertised.

I am just a little concerned that the supposed debut of a possible Camaro rumored to be around '07 is pushed off even further because the possible car is shuffled from one platform to another when there is some evidence to suggest that development (on Zeta?) is already under way. I realize that there is a lot of if's here but... I hope you see my point.
That is a valid concern. But I don't think that will end up being the case.
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #120  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!

Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Then what do you call GMX284? The program is a Chevy coupe and the leading cantidate is Camaro. The name won't be stuck on till it gets unveiled, but the Camaro is coming...and what a ride it will be.

Red I know you are reading this and I can't wait to read your book.
GMX284 is an internal code. There has been no "official" announcement however.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.