Torana = bigger kappa!
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Take a look at some of the numeros threads were we compared the 4th gens overall length to the GTO, 05 Mustang, Buick Velite, and even the H2. Its longer then all 4 of thoes cars.
And I guess it will be kappa. The first article said that Holden would be making this midsized RWD chassis. The later one says that Holden is booked trying to get Zeta ready.
And I guess it will be kappa. The first article said that Holden would be making this midsized RWD chassis. The later one says that Holden is booked trying to get Zeta ready.
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
The Camaro replacement (or the Chevy performance coupe) will be based on the Zeta chassis.
The Camaro replacement (or the Chevy performance coupe) will not be based on Kappa.
That's the plan.
With that said, and speculation mode on high, I can see how GM might decide at this 11th hour and 50 minutes into the development of the performance coupe (which will have much in common with the next GTO) GM changinging their play, naming the performance coupe something else, and doing a re-body of a Saturn Curve, complete with a V8 and naming that Camaro instead.
There have been some changes with Kappa over the year.
BTW: The Torrana is ZETA based, not Kappa.
Holden was part of a corperate wide competition for a new mid-sized RWD car. The Holden didn't win, but the design just may well end up on the proposal that did.
Speculative Conclusion:
This mid-sized car won't be based on Zeta (Holden's proposal lost), but will be based on Kappa (GM-NA's propasal won). However, you can take a car's design proposal and put it on any chassis of similar size with alterations.
What it all means:
The so-called "Torrana" is your 1st look at GM's future mid-sized RWD cars due late this decade.
The Camaro replacement (or the Chevy performance coupe) will not be based on Kappa.
That's the plan.
With that said, and speculation mode on high, I can see how GM might decide at this 11th hour and 50 minutes into the development of the performance coupe (which will have much in common with the next GTO) GM changinging their play, naming the performance coupe something else, and doing a re-body of a Saturn Curve, complete with a V8 and naming that Camaro instead.
There have been some changes with Kappa over the year.
BTW: The Torrana is ZETA based, not Kappa.
Holden was part of a corperate wide competition for a new mid-sized RWD car. The Holden didn't win, but the design just may well end up on the proposal that did.
Speculative Conclusion:
This mid-sized car won't be based on Zeta (Holden's proposal lost), but will be based on Kappa (GM-NA's propasal won). However, you can take a car's design proposal and put it on any chassis of similar size with alterations.
What it all means:
The so-called "Torrana" is your 1st look at GM's future mid-sized RWD cars due late this decade.
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by guionM
The Camaro replacement (or the Chevy performance coupe) will be based on the Zeta chassis.
The Camaro replacement (or the Chevy performance coupe) will not be based on Kappa.
That's the plan.
With that said, and speculation mode on high, I can see how GM might decide at this 11th hour and 50 minutes into the development of the performance coupe (which will have much in common with the next GTO) GM changinging their play, naming the performance coupe something else, and doing a re-body of a Saturn Curve, complete with a V8 and naming that Camaro instead.
There have been some changes with Kappa over the year.
BTW: The Torrana is ZETA based, not Kappa.
Holden was part of a corperate wide competition for a new mid-sized RWD car. The Holden didn't win, but the design just may well end up on the proposal that did.
Speculative Conclusion:
This mid-sized car won't be based on Zeta (Holden's proposal lost), but will be based on Kappa (GM-NA's propasal won). However, you can take a car's design proposal and put it on any chassis of similar size with alterations.
What it all means:
The so-called "Torrana" is your 1st look at GM's future mid-sized RWD cars due late this decade.
The Camaro replacement (or the Chevy performance coupe) will not be based on Kappa.
That's the plan.
With that said, and speculation mode on high, I can see how GM might decide at this 11th hour and 50 minutes into the development of the performance coupe (which will have much in common with the next GTO) GM changinging their play, naming the performance coupe something else, and doing a re-body of a Saturn Curve, complete with a V8 and naming that Camaro instead.
There have been some changes with Kappa over the year.
BTW: The Torrana is ZETA based, not Kappa.
Holden was part of a corperate wide competition for a new mid-sized RWD car. The Holden didn't win, but the design just may well end up on the proposal that did.
Speculative Conclusion:
This mid-sized car won't be based on Zeta (Holden's proposal lost), but will be based on Kappa (GM-NA's propasal won). However, you can take a car's design proposal and put it on any chassis of similar size with alterations.
What it all means:
The so-called "Torrana" is your 1st look at GM's future mid-sized RWD cars due late this decade.

Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by SGT Posaune
Why take into consideration the total length? That will change with the design of the body and has little to do with what type of powertrain will go into the car. The reason the LWB Kapppas overall length is shorter is because they weren't designed with any over hang. Following your logic, the 4th Gen camaro would be a much smalller car since it only had a 101" wheelbase. The 4th gen was nearly half overhang. A new Camaro would have more overhang than the Curve and Nomad, but that doesn't mean the chassis would change. Put a Camaro body on that chassis and the overall length would grow, because the new Camaro will be designed with some overhang.
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
I disagree that it was too big. But, ya, it's been discontinued.
i don't understand why people are actually advocating longer overhangs. yes, the LENGTH of the car is what's used to define it's class or "bigness" not the wheelbase. but if the 4th gen had proper overhangs, like the cars with similar wheelbase do, it would be the length of a compact. but since it is the way it is, HUGE, it skips past the mid-sized category and nudges into the full-size. that is horrible for pretty much everything including handling, drivability (the approach angle is like 5 degrees!), interior space, weight, etc.
i mean, i'm not too sad about it being canned. if the 5th gen were to be based on this same 1960's chassis, i wouldn't even look at it. hopefully the 5th gen can be a fully modern car. The GTO is a perfect example of one. It just needs to be styled properly and it's chassis lowered maybe an inch to look like a Camaro and it would be nearly perfect.
Last edited by morb|d; Sep 23, 2004 at 12:40 PM.
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by morb|d
well, it's definitely WAY too big for its wheelbase.
Yes, the overhangs were huge in modern terms on the 4th Gen.
But, you can also extend the wheelbase rather than focusing solely chopping off the overhangs and keeping the same size wheelbase.
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by morb|d
your ignorance is staggering.
well, it's definitely WAY too big for its wheelbase.
i don't understand why people are actually advocating longer overhangs. yes, the LENGTH of the car is what's used to define it's class or "bigness" not the wheelbase. but if the 4th gen had proper overhangs, like the cars with similar wheelbase do, it would be the length of a compact. but since it is the way it is, HUGE, it skips past the mid-sized category and nudges into the full-size. that is horrible for pretty much everything including handling, drivability (the approach angle is like 5 degrees!), interior space, weight, etc.
i mean, i'm not too sad about it being canned. if the 5th gen were to be based on this same 1960's chassis, i wouldn't even look at it. hopefully the 5th gen can be a fully modern car. The GTO is a perfect example of one. It just needs to be styled properly and it's chassis lowered maybe an inch to look like a Camaro and it would be nearly perfect.
well, it's definitely WAY too big for its wheelbase.
i don't understand why people are actually advocating longer overhangs. yes, the LENGTH of the car is what's used to define it's class or "bigness" not the wheelbase. but if the 4th gen had proper overhangs, like the cars with similar wheelbase do, it would be the length of a compact. but since it is the way it is, HUGE, it skips past the mid-sized category and nudges into the full-size. that is horrible for pretty much everything including handling, drivability (the approach angle is like 5 degrees!), interior space, weight, etc.
i mean, i'm not too sad about it being canned. if the 5th gen were to be based on this same 1960's chassis, i wouldn't even look at it. hopefully the 5th gen can be a fully modern car. The GTO is a perfect example of one. It just needs to be styled properly and it's chassis lowered maybe an inch to look like a Camaro and it would be nearly perfect.
I don't think anyone was asking for overhangs as long as the 4th gen. on the next Camaro. I was refering to people saying the Kappas overall length was too short for a Camaro, which it is. If you take the chassis of a LWB Kappa and put a Camaro style body on it, it will have more overhang than the Curve does. Is that a little more clear for you?
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by crYnOid
Here is the link, it also contains a bit more info than I posted. No small wheel base zeta 

Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Lots of speculation here...but here's one fact.
No matter what you've heard about Kappa being profitable at low volume........Kappa needs a high volume Chevy product to make it viable.
No matter what you've heard about Kappa being profitable at low volume........Kappa needs a high volume Chevy product to make it viable.
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Lots of speculation here...but here's one fact.
No matter what you've heard about Kappa being profitable at low volume........Kappa needs a high volume Chevy product to make it viable.
No matter what you've heard about Kappa being profitable at low volume........Kappa needs a high volume Chevy product to make it viable.
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I still believe they can achieve this with the Nomad. I see tons of PT Cruisers on a daily basis, many of which are new and/or customized. The retro craze isn't dead yet... at least not on the west coast. 

Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The Kappa Nomad is all but dead. As far as retro goes....GM hopes to move 100,000 HHR's annually.
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
The Kappa "medium" based Torana PS's have already begun in Australia.
http://69.56.135.118/~hrt433/images/pscomp4.jpg
http://69.56.135.118/~hrt433/images/pscomp4.jpg
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The Kappa "medium" based Torana PS's have already begun in Australia.
http://69.56.135.118/~hrt433/images/pscomp4.jpg
http://69.56.135.118/~hrt433/images/pscomp4.jpg
Re: Torana = bigger kappa!
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The Kappa "medium" based Torana PS's have already begun in Australia.
http://69.56.135.118/~hrt433/images/pscomp4.jpg
http://69.56.135.118/~hrt433/images/pscomp4.jpg


