Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

SS and Camaro.....is that a good thing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 07:30 AM
  #61  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by IZ28


And DXed, yes the IROC-Z was almost the same thing as what the SS is now. But it was a new designation which commerated the Camaro Z28 being used as the car of choice of the IROC races that still acknowledged that the car was an IROC-Z28, a better, upgraded Z28.
Show me ANYWHERE that the car is called an IROC-Z28... It is IROC-Z. Not IROC-Z28. IROC-Z was an add-on package to the Z28, just as the 4th Gen's SS package was. It's NOT different, especially when you get to the 88 to 90 models when there was no Z28 at all!!!!!!!!! The term "IROC-Z28" is something you have fabricated.


It did not take a name from way back that meant something completely different and all of a sudden become an option to make the Z28 look like a mid-range nothing compared to the IROC-Z, like what the SS did to the Z28.


IROC-Z made Z28 a 'mid-model' just as much as SS did to the Z28 in the 4th gen.

I was ending grade school and begnning highschool the whole time IROC-Z's were around. I was in 7th grade in 1985. I graduated high school in 1990. SO, in my most impressionable years for cars, IROC-Z was the top Camaro... NOT Z28. Z28 was viewed as the car someone bought if the couldn't step up to the IROC-Z. People called (and still call the cars) IROC'S not "IROC-Z28's, or an "upgraded Z28" or anything like that... again, this is something you have made up in your mind to justify the heierarchy of the 3rd Gen.



It was like there were 2 top models, a Z28 or an upgraded Z28.
Not true, see above.


Then it just made sense to keep the better upgraded Z28 only in 88-90. The problem is using the SS name and not giving the Z28 the recognition it deserves.
How does DROPPING THE Z28 NAME for 88-90 give Z28 the recognition is deserves?!?!?!?!? lol.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 09:33 AM
  #62  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Show me ANYWHERE that the car is called an IROC-Z28... It is IROC-Z. Not IROC-Z28. IROC-Z was an add-on package to the Z28, just as the 4th Gen's SS package was. It's NOT different, especially when you get to the 88 to 90 models when there was no Z28 at all!!!!!!!!! The term "IROC-Z28" is something you have fabricated.






From '85 to '87 IROCs were Z/28's.....complete with Z28 emblems on the dashboard, rocker panels, and rear fascias. They were refered to as IROC-Z28 by GM, the media and enthusiasts....much in the same way that 4th gen SS's were refered to as Z28SS early on.

In '88 thru '90 when Z/28 was dropped, IROCZ emblems replaced the Z28 emblems on the exterior....but for some reason, (even though Z/28 as model was dropped), Z28 emblems remained on the interior.

Like I said earlier, I didn't really like Chevy naming their top Camaro package after what I think is pretty silly series.....but the IROC-Z had the Z/28's fingerprints all over it.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 09:55 AM
  #63  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Thank you. You said it all for me. And not only was Z28 on the interior, it was the ordering RPO of an 88-90 IROC-Z. And even IF the Z28 was made mid model-like, (it wasn't in 87, the LT was) the IROC-Z was a Z28 and its easy to see. Thats what the Z was for!! *Doh*

Last edited by IZ28; Apr 28, 2003 at 10:02 AM.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #64  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by IZ28
And not only was Z28 on the interior, it was the ordering RPO of an 88-90 IROC-Z.
If you really want to nit-pick about RPO's, when ordering a 4th gen SS I'm pretty sure you selected Z28 and then checked the SS performance/appearance package.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 08:17 PM
  #65  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: re: 1st gen Z/28

Originally posted by danno02SS
Horsepower was listed at 290 at 5800 rpm nominal. It's important to keep that word nominal in mind, because it means the 290 figure was just something somebody plugged into Chevy's spec sheets. It might just as well have been 300 or 350 or 400 bhp. Most, if not all, Z-28 302's put out more than 290 bhp and 290 foot-pounds of torque at 4200 rpm.

Actual horsepower depended a lot on which intake and exhaust manifolds you chose, which carburetor(s), and what internal modifications you pursued. No actual dyno figures were ever released by Chevrolet for the 302-cid Z-28 engine, but the auto magazines didn't hesitate to speculate. Their estimates ranged from a realistic 350 bhp in ROAD & TRACK to 370-plus in SPORTS CAR GRAPHIC to 400 bhp in CAR LIFE. All-out, blueprinted racing versions, like those built by Traco and Yunick, probably delivered in the neighborhood of 450 bhp, which took some heavy tinkering to pull from 302 cid and still expect reliability.

from Chapter 6 of Michael Lamm's "The Great Camaro"; and also from Chapter 14 of John Hooper's "The 1967-1968 Camaro Reference Book".
I must congratulate you. Your facts and references are impeccable.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 08:27 PM
  #66  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Z28Wilson
If you really want to nit-pick about RPO's, when ordering a 4th gen SS I'm pretty sure you selected Z28 and then checked the SS performance/appearance package.

Exactly.

Look, I'm not trying to rip IROC's... I like them and the 3rd Gen car... hell, I drove on for 4 years!

The thing is, no matter how nit-picky the 3rd Genners wanna get about it, IROC-Z was an "SS" before the 4th Gen even came about.

If IROC-Z is OK, there is no reason SS should be a problem.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 09:08 PM
  #67  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
I think Z284 and I explained before why it does cause a problem.
Old Apr 28, 2003 | 10:53 PM
  #68  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Darth Xed

The thing is, no matter how nit-picky the 3rd Genners wanna get about it, IROC-Z was an "SS" before the 4th Gen even came about.

If IROC-Z is OK, there is no reason SS should be a problem.
Darth, if after 5 pages of posts this is the best argument FOR an SS Camaro..(and as far as I can tell, you may have the strongest argument), SS is on thin ice with Camaro.
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 11:12 AM
  #69  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Not to beat a dead horse... but I will...

The IROC option (RPO B4Z) included special suspension, stowaway spare tire, P245/50VR16 black wall tires, aluminum wheels and halogen fog lamps. Available only with Z28. -source> http://www.camarosource.ca
The 3rd-Gen IROC-Z was a special equipment and styling option on top of the "base" Z/28. The 4th-Gen "SS" was a special equipment and styling option on top of the "base" Z/28.

Why "SS" was chosen should bo obvious to even the most feeble minded... they weren't running Camaros at IROC, and Chevy was trying to tie into the heritage of the "Super Sports".

Old Apr 29, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #70  
quick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 195
From: In a meeting
Make the SS the drag racer's solid axle, straight line, 1/4 mile sledgehammer, and the Z/28 the road racer's IRS, big braked, high-revving, nimble, light weight road carver, which is what it started out as--a Trams AM homologation special. Plenty of room for both.

Wasn't the first "SS" the Chevy Impala 409, about 1961?
Old Apr 29, 2003 | 05:26 PM
  #71  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by quick
Make the SS the drag racer's solid axle, straight line, 1/4 mile sledgehammer, and the Z/28 the road racer's IRS, big braked, high-revving, nimble, light weight road carver, which is what it started out as--a Trams AM homologation special. Plenty of room for both.

If Chevy were willing to commit to that level of differentiation for Camaro....I would sure be happy!

I'm sure Chevy would tell you though, how that would cost too much, there is not enough money for such frivolity, why would we want that anyway, dent resistant fenders should be exciting enough, etc., etc.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #72  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally posted by quick
...
Wasn't the first "SS" the Chevy Impala 409, about 1961?
Actually the "first" "SS" was a six cylinder.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:19 PM
  #73  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by jg95z28
Actually the "first" "SS" was a six cylinder.
....and of course the most recent SS's are six cylinders.....and from my perspective, I have no problem with that.
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 09:04 PM
  #74  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Actually the first SS was a special racing Corvette that Zora Arkus-Duntov engineered in 1957.

www.illustratedcorvetteseries.com/No7_1957_SS_Corvette.html

The "SS" nameplate was seen as a way to put a little bit of the Corvette spirit into every Chevrolet.
Old May 1, 2003 | 11:04 AM
  #75  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by danno02SS
Actually the first SS was a special racing Corvette that Zora Arkus-Duntov engineered in 1957.

The story goes........

Someone asked Zora if his purpose built Sebring race car was a sportscar. Zora responded..." no, it's a super sportscar".
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
marineengineer
New Member Introduction
3
Feb 9, 2015 03:59 AM
97TA-WS6-Con
Parts For Sale
7
Feb 1, 2015 01:01 PM
Hal Fisher
Site Help and Suggestions
4
Sep 14, 2002 09:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 AM.