SS and Camaro.....is that a good thing?
You make a great point Proud. I think plenty of people are willing to pay money for the perception of performance, in a stylish, comfortable package.
You used the "Pony" analogy and I'll give you another. Mid to late '80s IROC-Z's. They weren't all fast. In fact they didn't even all have TPI.
Even most of the TPI equipped IROCs and Trans Ams/Formulas weren't all that fast. Unless you ordered the proper options, your Tuned Port IROC came with a "peanut" cam, 2.73 rear gear, drum brakes, auto trans etc. Most would combine them with T-Tops and power everything.
They were slow....but they looked and sounded good and sold like hotcakes.
You used the "Pony" analogy and I'll give you another. Mid to late '80s IROC-Z's. They weren't all fast. In fact they didn't even all have TPI.
Even most of the TPI equipped IROCs and Trans Ams/Formulas weren't all that fast. Unless you ordered the proper options, your Tuned Port IROC came with a "peanut" cam, 2.73 rear gear, drum brakes, auto trans etc. Most would combine them with T-Tops and power everything.
They were slow....but they looked and sounded good and sold like hotcakes.
Originally posted by redzed
1. Do we really know what a base V6 should be? There's a choice between another 200hp pushrod slug and a pricier DOHC 250hp car that would actually be competitive. Choose the most affordable and you're back to where the V6 F4 left off. Picking the 24-valve option would make for a more expensive base model, and define the packaging of the car in a negative way.
1. Do we really know what a base V6 should be? There's a choice between another 200hp pushrod slug and a pricier DOHC 250hp car that would actually be competitive. Choose the most affordable and you're back to where the V6 F4 left off. Picking the 24-valve option would make for a more expensive base model, and define the packaging of the car in a negative way.
Originally posted by redzed
2. Another underpowered Camaro RS idea - bring back a weak V8 option, just like back in good old 1989. This cheap insurance, cheap engine nonsense is wearing thin.
2. Another underpowered Camaro RS idea - bring back a weak V8 option, just like back in good old 1989. This cheap insurance, cheap engine nonsense is wearing thin.
Originally posted by redzed
3. Demoting the SS to the role of a loaded, "disco cruiser" is another example of 1980s thinking. Does anybody want a high visual effect, but lower performance Camaro wearing the SS badge? Considering that the SS was the success story in the long decline of the F-body, marketing realities should be placed ahead of nostalgia.
3. Demoting the SS to the role of a loaded, "disco cruiser" is another example of 1980s thinking. Does anybody want a high visual effect, but lower performance Camaro wearing the SS badge? Considering that the SS was the success story in the long decline of the F-body, marketing realities should be placed ahead of nostalgia.
Originally posted by redzed
4. Making the Z28 a Camaro "Z06" is a rotten idea as well. The Z06 is a great car, but making the least desirable body style the exclusive performance leader is just plain stupid. Better yet, why would an automatic transmission option make any vehicle less of a performance car?
4. Making the Z28 a Camaro "Z06" is a rotten idea as well. The Z06 is a great car, but making the least desirable body style the exclusive performance leader is just plain stupid. Better yet, why would an automatic transmission option make any vehicle less of a performance car?
As I'm sure you know the Z06 only comes in hard top form, only with a 6-speed. I'm not saying automatics cant be performers or anything less. I know they are great for drag racing and very consistent. But as a road racer as the Z06 is and what I want the next Z28 to be you need a 6-speed. They are just seen as the sportier option. Ok I feel like I’m having a hard time getting my idea across.
Tell me what do you see the Z06 as? I see it as the upgraded style. Upgraded motor. Upgraded brakes and suspension. The top of the line car. The one everyone wants. it’s the “Z” car. Less frills more fun. I see no reason why the next Z28 cant be this.
I just think it would be dumb to have the top of the line Vette sitting on the lot in ‘07 being a “Z’ car and the top of the line Camaro being the SS. Wouldn’t this cause confusion with buyers? Why is the "Z" not the top of the line for both car lines is what I would think. The Z28 on the 5th gen should be top car no matter what it was in the past. The SS shouldn’t be looked at like the second in line though. But more as serving a different purpose.
Last edited by stars1010; Apr 25, 2003 at 11:21 AM.
Originally posted by stars1010
Ok I feel like I’m having a hard tikme getting my idea across.
Ok I feel like I’m having a hard tikme getting my idea across.
Originally posted by Z284ever
I think you're getting your idea across very effectively....and I pretty much agree with everything that you just said.
I think you're getting your idea across very effectively....and I pretty much agree with everything that you just said.
I try, I always get so scatter brianed when I make a long post.
Re: Wouldn't a better question be......
Originally posted by Doug Harden
......What exactly does the SS moniker mean?
It really seems to be a catch-all trim upgrade option.....with sometimes a modest increase in performance.......but always with an increase in $$.
Is this really what Chevy wants it to represent?
......What exactly does the SS moniker mean?
It really seems to be a catch-all trim upgrade option.....with sometimes a modest increase in performance.......but always with an increase in $$.
Is this really what Chevy wants it to represent?
In the '60s it used to mean a trim upgrade at a negligible price from the base model with the option of upgraded performance.
According to GM literature...todays' "SS" will mean upgraded trim, wheels, and performance from the base model but it appears it will be at a more than negligible price.
NOTE: In both cases, it upgrades the base model.
Last edited by Z284ever; Apr 25, 2003 at 02:08 PM.
Yup stars1010, IMO you got it down dude.
SS is the designation for a "sportier" model on all the regular Chevrolets, this should not be the all-out top performance Camaro. Z06 for the Corvette and Z28 for the Camaro. Lets leave all the revisionist name placing in the 4th Gen. It should be Base, RS, SS, and then Z28. All with their own purpose, looks, characteristics, and personality.
SS is the designation for a "sportier" model on all the regular Chevrolets, this should not be the all-out top performance Camaro. Z06 for the Corvette and Z28 for the Camaro. Lets leave all the revisionist name placing in the 4th Gen. It should be Base, RS, SS, and then Z28. All with their own purpose, looks, characteristics, and personality.
Originally posted by redzed
4. Making the Z28 a Camaro "Z06" is a rotten idea as well. The Z06 is a great car, but making the least desirable body style the exclusive performance leader is just plain stupid. Better yet, why would an automatic transmission option make any vehicle less of a performance car?
4. Making the Z28 a Camaro "Z06" is a rotten idea as well. The Z06 is a great car, but making the least desirable body style the exclusive performance leader is just plain stupid. Better yet, why would an automatic transmission option make any vehicle less of a performance car?
Re: Re: Wouldn't a better question be......
Originally posted by Z284ever
Good question. I have the feeling that Chevy is currently in the process of defining it to itself. I get the impression that it will become the volume Chevy performance/trim package, as "GT" is to Ford and "R/T" is to Dodge.
In the '60s it used to mean a trim upgrade at a negligible price from the base model with the option of upgraded performance.
According to GM literature...todays' "SS" will mean upgraded trim, wheels, and performance from the base model but it appears it will be at a more than negligible price.
NOTE: In both cases, it upgrades the base model.
Good question. I have the feeling that Chevy is currently in the process of defining it to itself. I get the impression that it will become the volume Chevy performance/trim package, as "GT" is to Ford and "R/T" is to Dodge.
In the '60s it used to mean a trim upgrade at a negligible price from the base model with the option of upgraded performance.
According to GM literature...todays' "SS" will mean upgraded trim, wheels, and performance from the base model but it appears it will be at a more than negligible price.
NOTE: In both cases, it upgrades the base model.
Re: Re: Re: Wouldn't a better question be......
Originally posted by Darth Xed
If this is such a big deal and a smack to the SS name, can you explain how Z28 has ever been anything different?
If this is such a big deal and a smack to the SS name, can you explain how Z28 has ever been anything different?
Re: Re: Re: Wouldn't a better question be......
Originally posted by Darth Xed
If this is such a big deal and a smack to the SS name, can you explain how Z28 has ever been anything different?
If this is such a big deal and a smack to the SS name, can you explain how Z28 has ever been anything different?
I think the SS strategy Chevy will be using is probably a good one.
I'm just not sure if this strategy will have a good effect or bad effect on a sporty model like the next Camaro...
It's one thing to spruce up a car with no sporty pretentions, but Camaro may need to be handled differently.
The only way I could see it working for Camaro, is if the base Camaro has little sportiness (which IMO would be a mistake), and if the Z/28 once again loses it's focus and becomes the "standard V8" Camaro, (also a mistake).
I guess what I'm trying to say is, don't diminish the Camaro brand, just to make the SS strategy work on it
Last edited by Z284ever; Apr 26, 2003 at 01:21 PM.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Wouldn't a better question be......
Originally posted by Z284ever
I think that you are misunderstanding me Darth. This is what SS was and is . I'm not saying it's a "smack" to the SS name......on the contrary. As a GM representative said at the Malibu Maxx SS intro......."SS has always been a way for family cars to get performance" ( or words to that affect).
I think the SS strategy Chevy will be using is probably a good one.
I'm just not sure if this strategy will have a good effect or bad effect on a sporty model like the next Camaro...
I think that you are misunderstanding me Darth. This is what SS was and is . I'm not saying it's a "smack" to the SS name......on the contrary. As a GM representative said at the Malibu Maxx SS intro......."SS has always been a way for family cars to get performance" ( or words to that affect).
I think the SS strategy Chevy will be using is probably a good one.
I'm just not sure if this strategy will have a good effect or bad effect on a sporty model like the next Camaro...
Well, seriously, if SS is and always was "just an upgrade from the base car"... how has the Z28 ever been different?
Both have always been an uprade to the base car... they are all Camaros .
If you wan to say "Z28" has only been on Camaros, while SS has been on others cars... well, then I'll present Z24, Z26, and Z34... same story.
I guess I am very on the fence with this... I perfer the Z28 name, which is why I find it odd to be arguing for the "other side", but there are a lot of mis-truths that keep getting said on this subject.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wouldn't a better question be......
Originally posted by Darth Xed
[B]Well, seriously, if SS is and always was "just an upgrade from the base car"... how has the Z28 ever been different?
[B]Well, seriously, if SS is and always was "just an upgrade from the base car"... how has the Z28 ever been different?
The Z/28 can't just be a V8 option, which for the past generation it was. There needs to be a smaller HP or smaller cube V8 below the Z/28 (RS, anyone) so the Z can become what the 1LE took over from the Z in the first place. The SS was an even higher cube or hp motor from the base V8.
A next generation of the Vortec-based alum motors would be a good base.
A next generation of the Vortec-based alum motors would be a good base.
Originally posted by bulldoguav
The Z/28 can't just be a V8 option, which for the past generation it was. There needs to be a smaller HP or smaller cube V8 below the Z/28 (RS, anyone) so the Z can become what the 1LE took over from the Z in the first place. The SS was an even higher cube or hp motor from the base V8.
A next generation of the Vortec-based alum motors would be a good base.
The Z/28 can't just be a V8 option, which for the past generation it was. There needs to be a smaller HP or smaller cube V8 below the Z/28 (RS, anyone) so the Z can become what the 1LE took over from the Z in the first place. The SS was an even higher cube or hp motor from the base V8.
A next generation of the Vortec-based alum motors would be a good base.


