Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Satun Ion Redline Disappoints...will the Cobalt SS be different?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2004, 03:02 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Big Red Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In front of you
Posts: 135
Satun Ion Redline Disappoints...will the Cobalt SS be different?

http://www.redlineforums.com/showthr...?p=452#post452

Made 197hp to the wheels, but only 169 ft/lbs. Not near enough to hang with an SRT-4. GM missed their mark with this car IMO....will the Cobalt SS be any different?
Big Red Jim is offline  
Old 03-21-2004, 03:31 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Evilfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Alton IL
Posts: 751
It does have some nice front seats.

Edit: What the hell are all the gauges doing in the center of the console?

Last edited by Evilfrog; 03-21-2004 at 03:42 PM.
Evilfrog is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 09:04 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Big Red Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In front of you
Posts: 135
*bump*

For the weekday crew
Big Red Jim is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 09:17 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Shempy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 264
Surprise. GM should push for the tuner market for its own viability, but they certainly don't appear to be trying very hard. And I also agree that center dash guages are awful.
Shempy is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 09:23 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
87camracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 329
i dont think gm really had the tuner market in mind for this car. IMO they really shouldnt put much effort towards the tuner market anyway, it will start to die down soon. the v8 RWD cars are making a return and a 300hp neon wont mean crap in the next few years. IMO anyway.
87camracer is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 09:40 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
hairbear21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 570
They claim that having guages in the center doesn't distract you as much while driving. I'd have to argue that one. As for the engine, the Ectotec has proven itself to handle high amounts of power, but I look for it to go the way of the Quad 4 HO. As for the SC, you can buy those over the counter for the 2.4 I4 that's in just about everything that GM sells. I KNOW that they could have made better power stock, but they are going to leave it to the after market which isn't all that bad. For example, you can buy polished housings for the 3800 SC that give you 20 extra hp with the stock pulley! And then a smaller pulley is another 20 hp with just the 3.4".
The seats are pretty cool though.
hairbear21 is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 11:18 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Dan Oldham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Frederick, Maryland USA
Posts: 273
Who cares if it beats the SRT4 or not? 197whp for a car that light, around 2500-2700lbs or so, I'm thinking, is pretty good. I'll have to drive one.
Dan Oldham is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 11:18 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
2MCHPSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Annapolis Md. USA
Posts: 754
The article claims it weighs over 2900
2MCHPSI is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 11:20 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
MrBonus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 27
They should have made it turbo.
MrBonus is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 11:21 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
MrBonus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 27
Originally posted by 87camracer
i dont think gm really had the tuner market in mind for this car. IMO they really shouldnt put much effort towards the tuner market anyway, it will start to die down soon. the v8 RWD cars are making a return and a 300hp neon wont mean crap in the next few years. IMO anyway.
Since when?

Half of the affordable V8 performance cars were KILLED 2 years ago while Japanese companies are getting more bold with their USDM offerings (Evo, STi, RX-8, 350Z, etc.).

Exactly how is this market dying and where is the great comeback?
MrBonus is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 11:49 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Big Red Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In front of you
Posts: 135
Originally posted by Dan Oldham
Who cares if it beats the SRT4 or not?
GM had better care, if they expect to sell any of them. It's supposed to be a direct competitor, and yet it gets mopped. GM dropped the ball, plain and simple.

Originally posted by Dan Oldham
197whp for a car that light, around 2500-2700lbs or so, I'm thinking, is pretty good. I'll have to drive one.
It's nowhere near 2500-2700lbs. It's several hundred pounds heavier.
Big Red Jim is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 12:00 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,338
I'd much rather have the SRT-4. Of course that isn't saying a whole lot. But it counts for something.

WTF are these companies thinking when they put all the guages in the center of the dash?

Is it just me or does the Saturn Ion seem like the car equivalent to a disposable camera?
Threxx is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 12:00 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
martinss01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: cincinnati, oh
Posts: 59
http://ww2.imagewiz.net/images/pramu...edline_pg3.jpg

this is what it looks like with an engine fire


ummm... the seats are kinda cool. but the gauges? down and to the right is less distracting than down? say again over? maybe its supposed to be for giving the officer an excuse as to why you were speeding?


mmmmm molded plastic..... *drools*
martinss01 is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 12:02 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
hairbear21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 570
I like the idea of a supercharger simply because you have a nice broad torque curve. Downside? Limited performance gains. A turbo is a lot easier to make power with than a supercharger. Don't get me wrong, I do like the supercharger, and I honestly think that they went with that simply for reliability purposes. I mean, if you can go to your dealer, buy a SC for your cavalier, and keep your warranty, speed isn't what they're concerned with.
hairbear21 is offline  
Old 03-22-2004, 12:37 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Drive XR7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 43
Originally posted by MrBonus
They should have made it turbo.
Yup... they should have. I'm surprised that i4 could turn the supercharger.
Drive XR7 is offline  


Quick Reply: Satun Ion Redline Disappoints...will the Cobalt SS be different?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.