Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Popular Hot Rodding, "The Camaro Is Back For 2007"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #61  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Post

Originally posted by jg95z28
And yet another thread is hijacked!
I didn't change the subject, just trying to correct some gross inaccuracies about the W72 Trans Am...

Did you hear that Popular Hot Rodding says the Camaro will be back for 2007? I think it will be a great car!
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 02:33 PM
  #62  
dream '94 Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,646
From: Portland, OR
Originally posted by Eric77TA
Did you hear that Popular Hot Rodding says the Camaro will be back for 2007? I think it will be a great car!
Is that how this thread started?....
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #63  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by Darth Xed
...I remember Trans Ams as being "cool" and all, but I just don't see how you can write off "most" of the people who didn't opt to buy the 6.6 as image-only people.

Let me take things back a ways... back in 1989, I bought my 1989 Camaro RS 5.0... I didn't get an IROC-Z, not because I wasn't a "car guy" or was just in it for the image, but because it was the best I could do at the time.

Also, another big thing ot consider about the 70's time frame is that the 6.6 was a pretty good gas hog, wasn't it? This was right in the middle of the Gas Crisis... a big, thirsty big block might not have been managable for a lot of people.

I guess it boils down to this: Ya, I am sure there were a lot of folks who bought the non-6.6 T/A as image cars, but to say MOST of them did... well, I think that is a real reach...
Perhaps another way of looking at it is comparing 4th gen Camaro buyers who spent $25,000 on a loaded V6 RS and the buyer who spent $25,000 on a modestly equpted Z28 6 speed.

There wasn't a very large price difference between the base TAs and the high performance versions. There was simply alot of people who wanted the 'looks' of the car more than they cared about the performance. Then they turned around and loaded them up with everything. A generalization, of course, but still a pretty accurate comparison.

Originally posted by jg95z28
And yet another thread is hijacked!
*We now return to our regularly scheduled broadcast*

I still think it's 2007 as a 2008, but if contracts are already going out.....

Last edited by guionM; Jun 21, 2004 at 02:46 PM.
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #64  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Let me take things back a ways... back in 1989, I bought my 1989 Camaro RS 5.0... I didn't get an IROC-Z, not because I wasn't a "car guy" or was just in it for the image, but because it was the best I could do at the time.

Nope. Bad analogy.

It would be like you getting an IROC...with the base LG4, base 15" wheels, rear drums...and loading it with options. So this loaded "milktoast" IROC would cost about as much as a G92 LB9/L98 IROC, but be as slow (or slower) than your 305 RS.

Last edited by Z284ever; Jun 21, 2004 at 09:59 PM.
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #65  
guesswhoo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 248
Originally posted by dream '94 Z28
How do you figure?
How do I NOT figure? "IF" the Camaro returns for the 2007 Model year it will be its 36th year of production and 40th anniversery since its introduction. Can a "real" die-hard Chevy guy correct me if I am wrong?? Please?
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #66  
Ryan's LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 561
From: Ventura County, CA
Rumor has it that the car is 85% complete, and that a launch for '07 is easily within reach. Weather or not this checks out though, I don't know. I sure hope so.
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 05:13 PM
  #67  
Ramune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 288
From: Minnesota
It would be kind of nice if we Pontiac fans got a little "gift" a few months down the road.
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 05:24 PM
  #68  
12SCNDZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,634
From: Newark, Delaware
Originally posted by ProudPony
I think Hunkins is a great guy. Very open-minded and a "car-guy" in general. I see his passion in his words frequently.

I want to step up and say that a bunch of hard-nosed guys here on this site gave Hunkins more than a hard time about 2 years ago when he started posting trial data for the (new and unreleased at that time) '03 Cobra. I think he was accused of everything from faking the data to being paid off by Ford. The coup-de-gras was when Johnny said for an acceleration comparison, the '03 Cobra would give the Z06 a good run for the money... oh geez did he get ripped over that comment. Well IMO, he basically got tired of the accusations and uneducated attacks because he was simply reporting what he was seeing and doing. As a result, his post count on this board basically died. I imagine he still reads here.

He has written about all kinds of cars and musclecars in his career, and he is an accomplished photographer too IMO.

As for him "jumping ship"... I don't think that's a fair statement, because he has made his living covering all kinds of cars. He is justified in moving around some, given his job at the time.

Maybe you refering to This Article that ran in MM&FF last year? He has also done some writing for other covers. This one is from Steeda's own website.

Anyways, nice to see him following the Camaro story!
Don't get me wrong. I like Johnny. I had a chance to meet him a few years ago at the GM High Tech "bolt On" LT1 meet that he invited me to. Definitely a "car guy".
My comment was meant to be "light hearted" based on that.

Frank
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #69  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
OK, I see it perhaps a little better now... I'll give credit to Z284ever, and Guy...

Kind of made it a bit clearer.

Still, I don't knwo that I'd swipe a huge stereotype across "most" of the non-6.6 buyers... but I do see you points a bit better now.

PS: Apologies on the big block statement... rather embarassing.
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 06:38 PM
  #70  
formula79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Originally posted by guionM
Yea, like HE said!



I do recall the T/A getting the same mileage as 350 Camaros of the time.

Yep, there's no Pontiac "big" block. The engine is the same dimensions, regardless as to if you had a 301, 350, 400, or 455 cubic inches.
The Pontiac 301 was a short deck V8 i.e. a "small block". There is a big difference between the other Ponco motors and the POS 301....the first Turbo Trans Am
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #71  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Originally posted by guionM


*We now return to our regularly scheduled broadcast*

I still think it's 2007 as a 2008, but if contracts are already going out.....
Too late. Unless they're willing to do the following:

6 months to design.
12 months to tool and validate.
PPAP 6 months prior to SORP.

Unless MFD found religion in the last year and I don't know about it, normal body sheetmetal tooling is still 52 weeks.

Unless you want compressed timing from MFD...

Which means they'll charge twice as much shorten it all the way down to 52 weeks.
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 08:18 PM
  #72  
DWray's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 852
From: Nude Bra Fulls, Texas
Originally posted by guionM
That's why I'm of the opinion that Firebirds died starting with the '83s.
1982 was the beginning of the 3rd generation F-Body, not '83.

Old Jun 21, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #73  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally posted by guesswhoo
How do I NOT figure? "IF" the Camaro returns for the 2007 Model year it will be its 36th year of production and 40th anniversery since its introduction. Can a "real" die-hard Chevy guy correct me if I am wrong?? Please?
Was not the Camaro introduced in June of 1966, and officially launched in September of 1966? I was an infant at the time but I'm fairly sure I'm correct on this.

Last edited by jg95z28; Jun 22, 2004 at 10:46 AM.
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #74  
ProudPony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Originally posted by 12SCNDZ
Don't get me wrong. I like Johnny. I had a chance to meet him a few years ago at the GM High Tech "bolt On" LT1 meet that he invited me to. Definitely a "car guy".
My comment was meant to be "light hearted" based on that.

Frank
No no no... no foul taken!
It's all good!

I just thought a few of the newer posters in this forum (we have lots of those lately) might want to know why the comment about Hunkins not being here was made - nothing more.

No fingers pointed or names named... It's all good.

I wouldn't mind Johnny making the scene again though...
It's always nice to have fresh perspectives IMO.




BTW - nice run through the T/A history guys... I've learned a lot!

And Darth, the late '70's were a time "out of time". Looks were EVERYTHING then... Elton in platforms, Bowie dressed like a girl, Travolta in 747 collars, polyester bell bottoms, white vinyl shoes with rubber soles, 'fros, perms, and of course cars with stickers (and typically gaudy colors to boot). Maybe it was fall out from the drug use of the '60's?!?!

All car makers were into the stickers then... T/A, Z/28, King Cobra, Monza, and several other cars. I'm more adept at Fords so I'll tell you the MPG and Stallion packages were available for Pintos, Mavericks and Mustangs for starters - purely a glamour kit, but they sold like crazy. King Cobra was a $1277 option on the Mustang that was only a $3k car to start with!!!
Check out some of these vintage links for impressions!


wheels
Handler
Monza/Mustang
another Mustang/Monza cover
'78 T/A
'78 King Cobra
'79 Z28

It's all about looks, not how fast you were back then.
Yup, ya just had to be there pimpin' yo stuff to "get it".
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 09:06 AM
  #75  
dream '94 Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,646
From: Portland, OR
Originally posted by guesswhoo
How do I NOT figure? "IF" the Camaro returns for the 2007 Model year it will be its 36th year of production and 40th anniversery since its introduction. Can a "real" die-hard Chevy guy correct me if I am wrong?? Please?
I read your statement wrong. My bad, you're right. Sorry.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.