Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: Which Camaro model is LEAST important to a 5th gen?
Base Camaro
23
38.98%
SS
16
27.12%
Z/28
8
13.56%
They are ALL unimportant.
12
20.34%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll

PARALLEL UNIVERSE POLL! Which Camaro model is least important

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2003 | 10:25 AM
  #16  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by jrp4uc
But if the intent is for the SS to compete with the Cobra, such minor upgrades will not be enough. I think I posted it in the parallel poll, but if/when the SS returns (or whatever top model designation you like), it should provide more substance and separation from the Z28 (base V8) model. The Cobra's visuals are quite minor over the GT; it earns all its credibility from substance.

Even though "SS" models are popular across the Chevy line right now, I'd be surprised if it was available immediately upon fifth gen launch (unless it replaces Z28). You can provide a lot of options and customizablity without necessarily having to offer a large variety of model names (see Mini Cooper and Cooper S: 2 models with endless number of options).

The demand will be there simply because the cars would be new and have been on hiatus. I think an SS model introduced later along with other limited specialty models (ala Bullitt, Mach1) would be more realistic and a better business plan, along with more consistent general refreshening.

Now, all of that I can agree with.

The 4th Gen SS did compete well with the Cobra available up until the 2003 model, and we all now there is no 2003 Camaro.

But for a 5th Gen SS to compete with what Ford is doing with the Cobra, ya, the formula will need to be altered.
Old May 2, 2003 | 10:28 AM
  #17  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
If the '06 Cobra actually has 500hp as reported....you can forget about any Camaro competing with it .....maybe even especially SS.

See my comments in the parallel poll.
Old May 2, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #18  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Since this poll was so obviously set up to b*tch about the SS again, I have refused to vote.

I think each trim level is important to the next Camaro. The base model must be desireable enough to bring in the younger "sporty" car buyers while the Z28 and SS can be different enough to both be relevant and desireable, independent of each other.
Old May 2, 2003 | 07:56 PM
  #19  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by guionM
SS is very very very important.

There's alot of people out there who absolutely would rather pay $30,000+++ to get that hood, SS labels, and 1" bigger wheels, than the lowly $23-25,000 Z28 with the same engine and performance!

The sales history bears this out.
(The last part, unlike the rest of this post, isn't sarcasm but actually true )
...but did they sell more SS's in the last years because more people wanted them or because they devalued the plain jane Z28 so much that people just stopped buying Z28's (and Camaros) altogether, leaving the stylish SS as the only camaro anyone wanted?

I say if the Z28 wasn't held back by the SS and at least LOOKED AS GOOD they would have sold far more Z28s (not at the expense of the SS, but in TOTAL!)

When I looked at Camaro's, the Z28 styling and lack of updates did it in for me. Can't even see the dual exhaust...no styling differences from the base model...And 16" Wheels? Ugly one's at that! Come on! At least my '94 Z28 didn't look like a Chrysler Sedan from the front!!

My Rank of Importance:

1) Z28 (it is the essence of Camaro)
2) Base model - Must be the sales leader - and desirable!!
3) RS
4) LT
5) Any special edition
6) Fleet Models
7) Police Models
8) Rental Cars
9) U2 Spyplane landing aid cars
10) SS models
Old May 2, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #20  
kizz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 564
From: Fletcher, NC, US
it appears you left off most Camaro models, so I couldn't really vote for the one I wanted to vote for. I guess they are all unimportant then.

In this whole thread, I haven't seen one single mention of the Berlinetta. Which to me personally would rank as a pretty important model. How quickly we forget, eh?

important / unimportant is a very vague and general term anyway. Base model is important for high sales, top model is important for satisfying performance-types, middle model is good for a differentiation or an appearance package, etc. At least that's the way it used to be before the 90s.

gt
Old May 2, 2003 | 10:50 PM
  #21  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
...but did they sell more SS's in the last years because more people wanted them or because they devalued the plain jane Z28 so much that people just stopped buying Z28's (and Camaros) altogether, leaving the stylish SS as the only camaro anyone wanted?

I say if the Z28 wasn't held back by the SS and at least LOOKED AS GOOD they would have sold far more Z28s (not at the expense of the SS, but in TOTAL!)

When I looked at Camaro's, the Z28 styling and lack of updates did it in for me. Can't even see the dual exhaust...no styling differences from the base model...And 16" Wheels? Ugly one's at that! Come on! At least my '94 Z28 didn't look like a Chrysler Sedan from the front!!

My Rank of Importance:

1) Z28 (it is the essence of Camaro)
2) Base model - Must be the sales leader - and desirable!!
3) RS
4) LT
5) Any special edition
6) Fleet Models
7) Police Models
8) Rental Cars
9) U2 Spyplane landing aid cars
10) SS models
Great post, I was gonna say something similar.
Old May 3, 2003 | 12:52 PM
  #22  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by WERM
At least my '94 Z28 didn't look like a Chrysler Sedan from the front!!
If I'm not mistaken, the Chrysler sedan headlight style came out after the Camaro's. So if anything it was Chrysler's car that looked like a Camaro.

Chrysler has a pretty good history of this actually. Their Sebring coupe in the mid-ninety's had strikingly similar Camaro cues in the rear....
Old May 3, 2003 | 03:48 PM
  #23  
kizz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 564
From: Fletcher, NC, US
What about that bubble-Taurus of the 90s? Looked pretty much the same as a 4th gen Firebird from the back. First time I saw both cars, that's the first thing that came to my mind. 96-99 generation, I think.

http://ebay1.ipixmedia.com/abc/M28/_...8bcb/i-9_B.JPG

http://images.fotki.com/v1/photos/4/...wsisd03-vi.jpg

gt

Last edited by kizz; May 3, 2003 at 03:55 PM.
Old May 3, 2003 | 04:00 PM
  #24  
Schismblade's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 563
From: Z
Originally posted by Z284ever
If the '06 Cobra actually has 500hp as reported....you can forget about any Camaro competing with it .....maybe even especially SS.

See my comments in the parallel poll.
A supercharged LS6 would do the trick, but I doubt GM would do that. It seems only the C6 Z06 will be able to compete with it.
Old May 3, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #25  
USHotRod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 639
From: Anchorage, AK
Has anyone looked at a 98+ camaro next to a 2nd Gen? I think thats where the styling cues actually came from.
Old May 3, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #26  
av8er's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 159
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
I think the most important model is the base car. The base forth-gen did not sell like the v6 stangs thus killing the entire line. I personally care about the performance (Z28) model but if we are to have a affordable car the base must be most important. The fith-gen needs to sell well to the entry-level buyers or it also will not work out in the long run.

JeffA
Old May 3, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #27  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally posted by av8er
I think the most important model is the base car. The base forth-gen did not sell like the v6 stangs thus killing the entire line. I personally care about the performance (Z28) model but if we are to have a affordable car the base must be most important. The fith-gen needs to sell well to the entry-level buyers or it also will not work out in the long run.

JeffA
exactly
Old May 3, 2003 | 10:12 PM
  #28  
DarthIROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,291
From: Teeter-tottering between Brilliance and Insanity
You should have put RS, its the least important.
Old May 3, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #29  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Z28Wilson
Since this poll was so obviously set up to b*tch about the SS again, I have refused to vote.

Yeah, I know what you mean. I thought the Nissan Pathfinder poll was obviously set up to b*tch about the SS again....so I refused vote in that one .
Old May 3, 2003 | 11:59 PM
  #30  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Eaxactly!!

Truth is SS was a good money maker for GM... and it left Z28 as the "no frills, no BS" performance Camaro that so many here say it should be... ...yet say it wasn't ...
Low cost or no cost things that would have truly made the 4th gen Z/28 the "no frills, no BS" performance Camaro:

* Standard 17" wheels
* Standard Hurst shifter
* Standard 1LE suspension

You see....the parts were there, but GM did not have the will.

PS...and SS could keep the semi-functional Z/28 hood scoop.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.