Oh Oh!
Originally posted by Silverhawk
Hmmm......
I've been comparing Crispey's drawings to the old Hot Wheels "Muscle Tone" car that came out a while ago. With the exception of the front end and the more Retro rear end curves of Crispey's drawing, I see a great deal of similarity - especially the windsheild and rooflines.
I wonder if the Muscle Tone car actually was a reactionary test bed design for a new Camaro?
Hmmm......
I've been comparing Crispey's drawings to the old Hot Wheels "Muscle Tone" car that came out a while ago. With the exception of the front end and the more Retro rear end curves of Crispey's drawing, I see a great deal of similarity - especially the windsheild and rooflines.
I wonder if the Muscle Tone car actually was a reactionary test bed design for a new Camaro?
Crispy's, Kris Horton's, and a laundry list of other retro concepts all look pretty much the same... at least in overall theme.
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Not trying to open the proverbial "can of worms", but to be honest, a new Camaro that is retro styled after the first gen car is going to have a pretty predictable look to it.
Crispy's, Kris Horton's, and a laundry list of other retro concepts all look pretty much the same... at least in overall theme.
Not trying to open the proverbial "can of worms", but to be honest, a new Camaro that is retro styled after the first gen car is going to have a pretty predictable look to it.
Crispy's, Kris Horton's, and a laundry list of other retro concepts all look pretty much the same... at least in overall theme.
Let us not forget that a member of this forum whom also happens to work for the General said that the car "IS NOT RETRO". 
I also agree that Sharpshooter's version met all the "criteria" without being too "retro"... let us hope that its something closer to the mark.

I also agree that Sharpshooter's version met all the "criteria" without being too "retro"... let us hope that its something closer to the mark.
Kris's and Evoks are both too retro for my taste. Its needs more agressive look to it. It looks to soft to be a Camaro in some ways.
IF it was going to be retro, I would hope that GM uses Kris's design. It looks the most agressive.
This was a picture done by the Great Rex Raider for a contest done for GMI.com
http://www.gminsidenews.com/wallpaper/bh8.jpg
slap a different nose on it and I would like for the next Camaro to be close to this.
IF it was going to be retro, I would hope that GM uses Kris's design. It looks the most agressive.
This was a picture done by the Great Rex Raider for a contest done for GMI.com
http://www.gminsidenews.com/wallpaper/bh8.jpg
slap a different nose on it and I would like for the next Camaro to be close to this.
Originally posted by Darth Xed
What's the difference between them summarizing all the stuff, and the same thing you did a few months ago?
OK for one, but not the other, right?
What's the difference between them summarizing all the stuff, and the same thing you did a few months ago?
OK for one, but not the other, right?
I wrote my article in September of last year (almost a year ago not a few months), and while something's had been previously mentioned I went into pretty deep detail for that time. Either way, i am not gonna defend an article writeen a year ago.
I just hope that they are publishing late enough not to hurt GM in the naming process, or negotiating with the CAW. If it goes into as much detail as I am assuming it does, I would have personally waited until the new CAW contract was negotiated to put it in print.
Last edited by formula79; Jul 6, 2004 at 05:11 PM.
Originally posted by jg95z28
Let us not forget that a member of this forum whom also happens to work for the General said that the car "IS NOT RETRO".
I also agree that Sharpshooter's version met all the "criteria" without being too "retro"... let us hope that its something closer to the mark.
Let us not forget that a member of this forum whom also happens to work for the General said that the car "IS NOT RETRO".

I also agree that Sharpshooter's version met all the "criteria" without being too "retro"... let us hope that its something closer to the mark.
Originally posted by Big Als Z
Its needs more agressive look to it. It looks to soft to be a Camaro in some ways.
Its needs more agressive look to it. It looks to soft to be a Camaro in some ways.
Guys and gals, realise at this time that what you THINK the new Camaro SHOULD look like doesn't matter at this point. We were told that the body design was just short of ordering the molds.
All PHR is trying to do (and some others) is put together the most accurate drawing of what the next car will look like based on what some have seen.
All PHR is trying to do (and some others) is put together the most accurate drawing of what the next car will look like based on what some have seen.
90Z28 SS's concepts are the only one's Ive ever really liked. There are a lot of nice ones and great art work, but his seem to blend a lot of the gens together without getting bogged down. But it seems we wont be going that direction. Lets just pray it's RWD, V8, handles well and sells well.
I'm just glad the ball is rolling on this (finally)
You can put me in the camp with those who DO NOT want to see another "retro" designed car - being the new Camaro or any vehicle. IMO The next gen Camaro should have a whole new, forward thinking aesthetic. Not another regurgitation of a past design theme. I'll wait and see what the actual vehicle looks like and just hope for the best.
You can put me in the camp with those who DO NOT want to see another "retro" designed car - being the new Camaro or any vehicle. IMO The next gen Camaro should have a whole new, forward thinking aesthetic. Not another regurgitation of a past design theme. I'll wait and see what the actual vehicle looks like and just hope for the best.
Originally posted by formula79
Every one of my posts you reply to, you say something negative...so why not just not say anything and save us both the anger.
I wrote my article in September of last year (almost a year ago not a few months), and while something's had been previously mentioned I went into pretty deep detail for that time. Either way, i am not gonna defend an article writeen a year ago.
I just hope that they are publishing late enough not to hurt GM in the naming process, or negotiating with the CAW. If it goes into as much detail as I am assuming it does, I would have personally waited until the new CAW contract was negotiated to put it in print.
Every one of my posts you reply to, you say something negative...so why not just not say anything and save us both the anger.
I wrote my article in September of last year (almost a year ago not a few months), and while something's had been previously mentioned I went into pretty deep detail for that time. Either way, i am not gonna defend an article writeen a year ago.
I just hope that they are publishing late enough not to hurt GM in the naming process, or negotiating with the CAW. If it goes into as much detail as I am assuming it does, I would have personally waited until the new CAW contract was negotiated to put it in print.
I appreciate some of the things you bring to the table.... BUT
Think before you bash other people.
I guess I should expect nothing less from someone who has to have their name in 500pt. font in their signature on their own website.
Originally posted by formula79
I had someone very in the know point out sharpshooter's artwork and tell me how great it was
I had someone very in the know point out sharpshooter's artwork and tell me how great it was
Originally posted by ShadowLord69
I WILL BE POSTING A PIC ALL OF YOU WILL WANT TO SEE
when i can get back to my freinds place to scan it.
it is from a ...freind pretty high up in gm ok. so wait give me a week or so ok.
I WILL BE POSTING A PIC ALL OF YOU WILL WANT TO SEE
when i can get back to my freinds place to scan it.
it is from a ...freind pretty high up in gm ok. so wait give me a week or so ok.


