Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 08:46 AM
  #31  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

You know, I'm setting myself up to purchase a top of the line Camaro in 08/09/10 whichever year it arrives... BUT. I do have two children, and if a Quad Coupe G8 with a top model GTO arrives... I might make a brand switch... And I'm typically hardcore Chevy.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #32  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
The fact that the proportions could be totally different?
Or the fact that the proportions could be very similar?

Which is right? Do you know? I don't - but it still worries me (perhaps incorrectly) that they are building the two cars on the same platform.

Bob
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 09:07 AM
  #33  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Or the fact that the proportions could be very similar?

Which is right? Do you know? I don't - but it still worries me (perhaps incorrectly) that they are building the two cars on the same platform.

Bob
Yes they could be very similar. But looking at the W-bodies which are the same platform and they share NOTHING that you can see, except a long fron overhang. BTW I have no clue what it will be but GM has done very well with its more recent platform mates, CSVs and Torrent being the exceptions rather than the rule.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 09:11 AM
  #34  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Or the fact that the proportions could be very similar?

Which is right? Do you know? I don't - but it still worries me (perhaps incorrectly) that they are building the two cars on the same platform.

Bob
The Zeta GTO, which was cancelled over a year ago, would have been a coupe slightly larger than the Camaro concept.

Judging by Lutz's comments, it's apparent the he really wants to restart a GTO program. What we end up with is at this point, is unknown.

Personally, I think a reskinned Camaro called GTO would be a dumb move.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #35  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

If the design sketch I saw last year was any indication of what a new GTO wwould be like, I think it would be successful. It had the utility of a 4-door, but isn't as blasphemous as the Charger. It would also be a distinguishing feature over the Camaro to prevent cross cannibalization between the two. This GTO would be the top model, no need for a G8 and act as the halo vehicle for the brand.
I agree 100% with this. Having a GTO the same size as the Camaro, with the same interior size and same overall functionality, would limit the GTO sales/success and leave it with much less to distinguish itself from the new Camaro. Doorlets would be just the thing to bring the GTO into the modern age. If it bugs people for a GTO to have them, fine, call it something else like Tempest (hopefully not the alpha-soup G8 ).
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #36  
Joe K. 96 Zeee!!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,531
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Differentiation is key! Most of us believe that. It's been said that GTO may be a 4 door. Could you even do that on a 5th gen sized car?

Here's what I'd like to see. Pontiac Sedan and Coupe similar to what was done with the W-body Impala/Monte Carlo. One is "G8" the other GTO.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #37  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Personally, I think a reskinned Camaro called GTO would be a dumb move.
GTO needs to be a larger car than Camaro, no doubt about it. Look at how well the LX cars do, because people want muscle with the ability to carry people. While I still shudder at the thought of a 4 door GTO, Charger's success with the blasphemous 4 doors can't be overlooked, and I can't blame Pontiac for looking in that direction.

Just as long as GTO doesn't end up being a Camaro reskin, I'd be happy.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #38  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Personally, I think a reskinned Camaro called GTO would be a dumb move.
So do I. And while we're stating opinions, I would prefer that Camaro get smaller vice GTO getting bigger in order to differentiate them.

However, what I would prefer is rather irrelevant - they will be what they will be.

Bob
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #39  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
. While I still shudder at the thought of a 4 door GTO, Charger's success with the blasphemous 4 doors can't be overlooked, and I can't blame Pontiac for looking in that direction.
What if it were more in a theme(not talking size or exact style of ) of Mercedes CLS class and really did look more like a coupe than a 4 door ? The Charger still blantenly looks like a 4 door family sedan . I dont think the Pontiac RWD whatever it is should be made to satisfy the masses , and with the scaling down of Pontiac , I just dont think youll see a 4 door and a 2 door off the same chassis . Im not a insider though , so thats just my opinion .
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #40  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Okay, here we go.....

So, you're saying that the people working on Camaro and "Impala" are somehow excluded from any knowledge of this super secret GTO program, which wasn't actually cancelled last year?
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
To me it sounds like he is saying that the GTO is simply a drawing right now and maybe some computer math. It is just a design that could be put onto the Camaro structure quickly and efficiently. But as of now is nothing more than an idea and a business model that is not approved.
There ya go.

Although it's quite aways from computer math, it IS in the business portfolio, will be part of the program, and by Lutz's comments, can easily be assumed to be now incorperated into the Camaro program.


Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yup, because then essentially we'd have a Firebird called GTO - which would be stupid and a waste of resources.
I would think so too. However, if there's enough in looks and mission to put distance between the 2 (unlike the Firebird) which wouldn't attract the same customer base, they might pull it off.

Here's an example:

Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
You know, I'm setting myself up to purchase a top of the line Camaro in 08/09/10 whichever year it arrives... BUT. I do have two children, and if a Quad Coupe G8 with a top model GTO arrives... I might make a brand switch... And I'm typically hardcore Chevy.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #41  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

We're thinking a little narrow here overall. Zeta is all about making a variety of cars cheaply off of the same components. But we're still thinking "either/or" here.

Zeta has been toned down quite a bit. Initially, GM planned to make full sized & sports cars based on Zeta starting in 2008, and mid sized Zeta based cars in 2010. The mid sized idea is dead, but the large line is still very much alive.

There is not a choice between the "G8" and "GTO". We're probally going to see both. The Pontiac coupe will be a roomier Camaro, and the so-called "G8" is going to be the "Impala" sedan (at the moment, calling it Impala is questionable).

There is a floorpan stamping under the Zeta which will be made in at least 2 lengths, most likely 3. It's noticable in Camaro's CAD drawing. This is how we're going to get a Pontiac "coupe", assuming GM isn't simply going to drop it on the Camaro body.

There's the feeling that the "GTO" isn't going to happen because it would cost too much. Let me point out that creating a longer wheelbase Pontiac coupe off of the Chevy Camaro body would cost alot less than the Kappa, would sell more than the projected annual average of 35K of the Kappa, and would sell at a much higher price than the Kappa.

Not saying that 100% the Pontiac coupe has a longer wheelbase. I know it started that way, and I probally won't get word on it till GM gives final OK on the lineup and I get details. But along with it, the Camaro, and the Chevy RWD sedan, there also is a Pontiac and a Buick sedan that's also up for approval with the rest of the program. I believe Buick may be delayed till Lecerne runs it's course (since it's replacement no longer seems to be the next DTS Sigma), but Pontiac seems set for a sedan and a 'coupe'.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #42  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by guionM
We're thinking a little narrow here overall. Zeta is all about making a variety of cars cheaply off of the same components. But we're still thinking "either/or" here.

Zeta has been toned down quite a bit. Initially, GM planned to make full sized & sports cars based on Zeta starting in 2008, and mid sized Zeta based cars in 2010. The mid sized idea is dead, but the large line is still very much alive.

There is not a choice between the "G8" and "GTO". We're probally going to see both. The Pontiac coupe will be a roomier Camaro, and the so-called "G8" is going to be the "Impala" sedan (at the moment, calling it Impala is questionable).

There is a floorpan stamping under the Zeta which will be made in at least 2 lengths, most likely 3. It's noticable in Camaro's CAD drawing. This is how we're going to get a Pontiac "coupe", assuming GM isn't simply going to drop it on the Camaro body.

There's the feeling that the "GTO" isn't going to happen because it would cost too much. Let me point out that creating a longer wheelbase Pontiac coupe off of the Chevy Camaro body would cost alot less than the Kappa, would sell more than the projected annual average of 35K of the Kappa, and would sell at a much higher price than the Kappa.

Not saying that 100% the Pontiac coupe has a longer wheelbase. I know it started that way, and I probally won't get word on it till GM gives final OK on the lineup and I get details. But along with it, the Camaro, and the Chevy RWD sedan, there also is a Pontiac and a Buick sedan that's also up for approval with the rest of the program. I believe Buick may be delayed till Lecerne runs it's course (since it's replacement no longer seems to be the next DTS Sigma), but Pontiac seems set for a sedan and a 'coupe'.
Guy do you think the Holden Statesman will come over as a Buick with just a re-badging? That seems to be what Bob was hinting at. Also what is going on with the Utes in Aus. Are they moving along with it or was it pushed back? Could these be made along side the coupes in the US giving the Australians more capacity for just sedans, maybe upping the Buick Statesman's case?
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #43  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Guy do you think the Holden Statesman will come over as a Buick with just a re-badging? That seems to be what Bob was hinting at. Also what is going on with the Utes in Aus. Are they moving along with it or was it pushed back? Could these be made along side the coupes in the US giving the Australians more capacity for just sedans, maybe upping the Buick Statesman's case?
I've been told that the US is getting another Holden.

Personally, I believe it's the UTE as an El Camino. However, Buick's Zeta was supposed to be a redone Statesman initially.

The wild card is that while Australia's dollar grew stronger the past few years, our dollar grew weaker. I feel a Ute which is low priced in Australia(around $24K US with LS1 and 6 speed) can still be easily sold here at a profit, while the Statesman ($40K+ US) is really questionable.

No impossible, just questionable.

Afterall, GTO was cheaper than Monaro.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 01:24 PM
  #44  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Originally Posted by guionM
There ya go.

Although it's quite aways from computer math, it IS in the business portfolio, will be part of the program, and by Lutz's comments, can easily be assumed to be now incorperated into the Camaro program.
That's great. But as of end of business yesterday, there is no G8 or GTO program that is being worked on. And I'm not just talking about "officially unapproved", like Camaro or Impala....I'm talking nada, zip, zero.
I'm not saying there won't be one down the road...especially, since BL has made those comments. But there is none now...nor has there been for over 15 months.

Here's another one where we'll have to agree to disagree.
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #45  
NikiVee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 826
From: No where
Re: My take on Lutz's GTO comments and the Camaro effect.

Not true at all.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.