a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by AronZ28
Well, I think the lesson to be learned here is that GM needs to do a better job of covering its a@@. I can only speculate why GM is going ballistic over this issue. My speculation is that they already know who the leak is, and his head is most likely on the silver platter. I bet they are trying to figure out if he/she leaked any other info. Also, I would imagine that it would be much easier and less expensive to tighten security measures rather than spend all this money to investigate, hire lawyers, and show up at people's door steps like secret government CIA agents. And GM should let whoever leaked the info burn at the stake, along with people who knew that they were posting illegal pics.
Also, it doesn't suprise me that Red Planet is going away. He takes too much of a risk by posting on here. I wouldn't risk my job over this site.
And that guy on RC45 on corvetteforum seems like a less than flattering character. If GM agents did show up on his door step, I am sure that he is greatly exageratting what exactly took place.
Also, it doesn't suprise me that Red Planet is going away. He takes too much of a risk by posting on here. I wouldn't risk my job over this site.
And that guy on RC45 on corvetteforum seems like a less than flattering character. If GM agents did show up on his door step, I am sure that he is greatly exageratting what exactly took place.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by Bobby1Kenobby
My problem is with logic like this. Some people are aying that because GM didn't protect the images properly, it is okay for people to steal them. This is equivalent to the cops telling you, "Well, since you left your window rolled down on your car, it's not a crime to reach in and steal your wallet." If this RC guy got the info like it has been argued, he is at fault and GM has a right to investigate him. I haven't read the posts on other sites but, as far as I know, no lawsuits have been filed. This is just a case of GM investigating. GM has every right to investigate this matter.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by Meccadeth
So say you have a freaky g/f that likes pics and videos taken of her nude and you also have friends that like to come over often. Say one of them stumbles upon your hiding spot for these and posts them on the internet....whos the bad guy?
Its pretty obvious, that guy who took and posted the pictures without my knolwege or consent. I'd be pissed as hell, and if I ever figured out who it was, I'd most likely get him to take them off the internet and then bash his head in. And I don't think I'd hook up with that type of woman anyways. No telling where a freak like that has been.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by Bobby1Kenobby
My problem is with logic like this. Some people are aying that because GM didn't protect the images properly, it is okay for people to steal them. This is equivalent to the cops telling you, "Well, since you left your window rolled down on your car, it's not a crime to reach in and steal your wallet." If this RC guy got the info like it has been argued, he is at fault and GM has a right to investigate him. I haven't read the posts on other sites but, as far as I know, no lawsuits have been filed. This is just a case of GM investigating. GM has every right to investigate this matter.
Hey, don't put words into my mouth. I didn't say that stealing the pics from GM is okay. STEALING IS ILLEGAL AND IMMORAL.
All I am saying is GM should do a better job of safeguarding their secrets from dishonorable, dishonset theifs. Or not hire those type of people who leak secrets.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
What the he!! are you talking about?!?
The C6 is absolutely the BEST BARGAIN on the planet. You can't buy that kind of performance for any where near that price.
The C6 is absolutely the BEST BARGAIN on the planet. You can't buy that kind of performance for any where near that price.

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Besides, isn't the C6 MSRP'd at nearly the same $$ as a C5? 

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
For that matter, when was the Corvette EVER marketed to the "average enthusiast"?? 

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
The Corvette is Chevy's Halo car...both in performance and technology....and it can basically charge what the market will bear......and still sell them all. 

Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by redzed
The word "BARGAIN" is incompatible with a homely car that has a price pushing $55-60K
So tell me, what car can you buy at this price offering better performance...I'll wait.
Now that the C6 Z06 is pushing into the $70k range
.....
......
Last edited by Z28Wilson; Nov 16, 2004 at 05:29 PM.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
For God's sake man, you really are the master at internet drivel. A base C6 stickers at $44,245. Ok so you don't like the base car. I just went to Chevy's website and fully optioned a C6 coupe and the MSRP came up right around $52,000. If I want to throw in the Z51 package we get close to $55,000. Where do you come up with this $60,000 sticker?
If you don't thnk that the $60k rag top is overpriced, consider the fact that the nifty Mercedes SLK55 AMG will probably start for less that quite a bit less than $60K.
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
FOR THE LOVE OF J.C., WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THIS FIGURE?!?!? I asked you earlier in this thread, then again it's just like you to ignore questions/points that conflict with your inexplicable hatred for all General Motors products . You show me where GM has released pricing info for the C6 Z06 and we'll talk.....
.....
......
.....
......
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by redzed
Shucks, Z28Wilson couldn't have heard that there's a drop-top C6 Corvette? That $60K figure is very posible with the soft top, and we're not even talking Z06.
Unless GM adopts a value pricing policy like the one Daimler-Chrysler applied to the 300 and Magnum (seemingly at the last moment), that $70K figure is very likely for the Z06.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by redzed
If you don't thnk that the $60k rag top is overpriced, consider the fact that the nifty Mercedes SLK55 AMG will probably start for less that quite a bit less than $60K.
Plus, that's a luxury car with 355hp. Considering the last gen SLK350 weighed about 3,300 pounds, adding a V8 means this one is probably even heavier.
How exactly does this car compare with a Corvette? They won't be cross shopped at all. Maybe with the XLR
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
That process is well underway.....but it's going to leave us a little less informed.
You "insiders" won't have as much info, but everyone else will be just as in the dark as GM wants us to be.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by MunchE
If GM closes off leaks of information it's going to pitch a fit about if it gets released to the public, it means people like YOU will be less informed, and people like me will be just as informed as ever.
You "insiders" won't have as much info, but everyone else will be just as in the dark as GM wants us to be.
You "insiders" won't have as much info, but everyone else will be just as in the dark as GM wants us to be.
MunchE, you've pretty much summed up my feelings on this one. I'm sure you'll continue to take a flaming from the "insiders", but know there are people that agree with you.
As for RP leaving, that is very sad indeed. I don't blame RP one bit. If my job was on the line for something like this, I'd be out of here too. The sad part that MunchE alluded to and 99% of you missed is that this kind of situation even exists in GM. Where employees have to fear for their careers because they tell future car buyers to "keep the faith".
All I can say, is GM better get it's act together. Just the discussion of incidents like this and the percieved cloak & dagger tactics are enough to send people elsewhere. The actual blame doesn't really factor into the equation.
Making RP feel that he can no longer join in discussions here is definitely a step in the **** direction for GM. Don't get me wrong, the guy who released the photo should fry, but the resulting overreaction by GM (as evidenced by posts like this all over the 'net) is not helping.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by redzed
Shucks, Z28Wilson couldn't have heard that there's a drop-top C6 Corvette? That $60K figure is very posible with the soft top, and we're not even talking Z06.
If you don't thnk that the $60k rag top is overpriced, consider the fact that the nifty Mercedes SLK55 AMG will probably start for less that quite a bit less than $60K.
Not to do your "shopping" for you, but this bargain SLK55 AMG starts at $61,220 with 360 HP from its supercharged 5.5L V8. What a piece of sh~t.
Unless GM adopts a value pricing policy like the one Daimler-Chrysler applied to the 300 and Magnum (seemingly at the last moment), that $70K figure is very likely for the Z06.
Re: a little legal 'strong-arming' from GM???
Originally Posted by redzed
I never recollect seeing a C5 coupe with a $54,500+ MSRP. That's what the sticker says, not dealer markup.
Too close to a Porsche 911 for comfort, at least where I stand. I wouldn't be cheap enough to pass up a Porsche 911 just to save the price of an Aveo.
The C5 Corvette was a huge success because it was accessable to moderately affluent enthusiasts. (Keep in mind that multiple car households with moderate 6-figure incomes are pretty much the "average" in the better parts of country.)
Now that the C6 Z06 is pushing into the $70K range.... In that price range...
Once again, talk numbers once you see them posted on GM site.
you might soon be able to purchase a Mercedes SLK55 AMG


