Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Lessons from the past

Old Apr 12, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #16  
AronZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,276
From: Chattanoga & Franklin
Re: Lessons from the past

I think it is because of the horrible packaging that was neccitated by the radical styling. The interior/trunk in terms of space when compared to the size of the car is riduculus.
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #17  
dfmoeller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 47
Re: Lessons from the past

Please don't flame me for this, but at least one reason the F died, is that the gen 4 did not appeal visually to the wide cross section that gens 1, 2, and 3 did. I personally found the gen 4 somewhat cartoonish in its bulges. This said from one who bought 4 new gen 2's and 1 new gen 3. I loved it mechanically (although an independent rear would have helped) and could live with the lack of a rear seat (hey, what did you think you were getting???? - more room than a 2 seater), but simply could never get past the looks. I'm certainly not alone in thinking this. Go back to the initial reviews in '92. They were not very approving of the styling. The best one, I recall, said it would grow on you. I simply won't buy a car that has to grow on me. And I didn't.

I know, I've committed heresy on this forum. Please spare me.
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:02 PM
  #18  
AronZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,276
From: Chattanoga & Franklin
Re: Lessons from the past

Originally Posted by dfmoeller
Please don't flame me for this, but at least one reason the F died, is that the gen 4 did not appeal visually to the wide cross section that gens 1, 2, and 3 did. I personally found the gen 4 somewhat cartoonish in its bulges. This said from one who bought 4 new gen 2's and 1 new gen 3. I loved it mechanically (although an independent rear would have helped) and could live with the lack of a rear seat (hey, what did you think you were getting???? - more room than a 2 seater), but simply could never get past the looks. I'm certainly not alone in thinking this. Go back to the initial reviews in '92. They were not very approving of the styling. The best one, I recall, said it would grow on you. I simply won't buy a car that has to grow on me. And I didn't.

I know, I've committed heresy on this forum. Please spare me.

You might not have your location posted in your profile......
But we will figure out where you live, drag you off and burn you at the stake.
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #19  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Re: Lessons from the past

Originally Posted by PacerX

With reference to the Camaro being the 2nd best selling sporty coupe, I'll bet ya a dozen doughnuts that the Grand Am 2-dr murdered the F-cars in sales.
Y'know...........that's something that had never occured to me.....

Very good and viable point.
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 02:52 AM
  #20  
steve2002's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 262
From: Oranje County
Re: Lessons from the past

Originally Posted by dfmoeller
Please don't flame me for this, but at least one reason the F died, is that the gen 4 did not appeal visually to the wide cross section that gens 1, 2, and 3 did. I personally found the gen 4 somewhat cartoonish in its bulges. This said from one who bought 4 new gen 2's and 1 new gen 3. I loved it mechanically (although an independent rear would have helped) and could live with the lack of a rear seat (hey, what did you think you were getting???? - more room than a 2 seater), but simply could never get past the looks. I'm certainly not alone in thinking this. Go back to the initial reviews in '92. They were not very approving of the styling. The best one, I recall, said it would grow on you. I simply won't buy a car that has to grow on me. And I didn't.

I know, I've committed heresy on this forum. Please spare me.
I actually always thought so myself.
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #21  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: Lessons from the past

Originally Posted by dfmoeller
Please don't flame me for this, but at least one reason the F died, is that the gen 4 did not appeal visually to the wide cross section that gens 1, 2, and 3 did. I personally found the gen 4 somewhat cartoonish in its bulges. This said from one who bought 4 new gen 2's and 1 new gen 3. I loved it mechanically (although an independent rear would have helped) and could live with the lack of a rear seat (hey, what did you think you were getting???? - more room than a 2 seater), but simply could never get past the looks. I'm certainly not alone in thinking this. Go back to the initial reviews in '92. They were not very approving of the styling. The best one, I recall, said it would grow on you. I simply won't buy a car that has to grow on me. And I didn't.

I know, I've committed heresy on this forum. Please spare me.
Totaly understand. I was also not a fan of 4th gen styling.
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 08:08 AM
  #22  
Ted 99 TA WS6 Conv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 145
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Re: Lessons from the past

Hmmm let me think.

1. Old design with no new R and D. 98 was simply a new front clip and a drop in of the LS1 (which lasted 5 years as a model I may add). My 94 and 99 had next to no differences.

2. No advertising ...

3. Product availability. Anyone remember what 98 and 99 were like .... anyone here try to order a WS6 ... I did and couldn't get one for 2 years.

Quebec plant had nothing to do with it. Product refresh, GM committment and vision where the problems.

I know I am speaking the unspeakable but .... Product perception - GM did nothing to modernize the image of the f-body driver. The public still see us and bubble gum chewing - backwards hat- cut off sleve - high school drop out holigans. Any attempt to improve the image failed. Rockford, Night Rider, various move scenes.
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #23  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Lessons from the past

This thread has been done a thousand times, do a search.
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 02:21 AM
  #24  
steve2002's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 262
From: Oranje County
Re: Lessons from the past

Originally Posted by Z28x
This thread has been done a thousand times, do a search.
But it had been a while...I wanted new opinions

I think Ted did a good job detailing it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Double aught
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Oct 2, 2015 11:29 PM
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:28 AM
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Sep 2, 2015 12:41 PM
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Aug 20, 2015 07:57 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.