Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Gt500: Loses weight, get's faster avoids gas guzzler tax.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2010, 01:08 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Gt500: Loses weight, get's faster avoids gas guzzler tax.

http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f...y-gt500-88877/
Z284ever is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:13 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Beanboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Posts: 233
100+ pound savings up front and 2-3 seconds faster a lap on two tracks. Definitely seems to be a bit more balanced of a car.
Beanboy is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:14 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
10 more HP, 1 more MPG and 100lbs. lighter
Z28x is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:16 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
I see where the engine lost 102 lbs, but nowhere indicating the total weight of the complete package.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:26 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 1,665
“One of the biggest changes for this Shelby is that the convertible acts and feels like a coupe,” said Jamal Hameedi, SVT chief nameplate engineer. “Before, they had a very different character, and the convertible is taking a big step in the sportiness and handling precision area, without degrading the ride.”

I did Jamal's Home Theater system He has a freakin SWEET upper level penthouse in Royal Oak, Michigan.
Mike94ZLT1 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:58 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
81Z28355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hemlock, Mich.
Posts: 329
I am going to the dark side. My 81 Z/28 will not have a Z/28 stable mate.

Sorry GM, to little to late again, I waited for the Z/28 for as long as I can. I am sure the Dealers will screw everyone over for a few years just like they did the Shelby and SS.

I just place my order for a 2011 SVT Shelby GT500. I am paying invoice price. You can hardly mod a SS with a super charger for that AND still keep your warrenty.

Off to the Mustang Forums.
81Z28355 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 01:59 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
STOCK1SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Confederate States of America
Posts: 1,049
I'm really starting to want this car, especially with the gas tax finally gone, I hate throwing away a grand for absolutely no purpose whatsoever. I also like being able to see out of the Mustang which I can't in the Camaro. Hate to say it but maybe a mustang in my future.
STOCK1SC is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 02:09 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Beanboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I see where the engine lost 102 lbs, but nowhere indicating the total weight of the complete package.
120 total.
Beanboy is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:06 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
muckz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 2,402
Originally Posted by 81Z28355
I am going to the dark side. My 81 Z/28 will not have a Z/28 stable mate.

Sorry GM, to little to late again, I waited for the Z/28 for as long as I can. I am sure the Dealers will screw everyone over for a few years just like they did the Shelby and SS.

I just place my order for a 2011 SVT Shelby GT500. I am paying invoice price. You can hardly mod a SS with a super charger for that AND still keep your warrenty.

Off to the Mustang Forums.
Congrats on your purchase! It's a great car, I am sure you'll love every moment being in it.
muckz is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 03:57 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
teal98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 3,132
According to the media site, base weight is 3820 pounds. Looks pretty neat.
teal98 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 05:34 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ZZtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,217
Originally Posted by teal98
According to the media site, base weight is 3820 pounds. Looks pretty neat.
Hmm, thats basically what it always was for real. The consensus of all the numbers I have seen and sights I have been to was 3,850 without the Shaker 1000 stereo. I guess Ford just rated it less conservatively this time as that's not any significant REAL weight savings......
ZZtop is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 07:57 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
MarcR94v6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,960
I just can't see past the new rear of the mustang, it turns me off of the whole thing, but it looks better on the Shelby.
MarcR94v6 is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 08:16 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
91_z28_4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pewee Valley, KY
Posts: 4,600
Originally Posted by MarcR94v6
I just can't see past the new rear of the mustang, it turns me off of the whole thing, but it looks better on the Shelby.
If your car was faster you may be able to see around it.
91_z28_4me is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 08:36 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Stockton, Ca. USA
Posts: 666
It still is an overweight pig, I just hope GM gets it. Lightweight is king in a performance car. I agree the backend looks like **** and kills the whole car for me.
TOO Z MAXX is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 11:15 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
94LightningGal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Payson, AZ USA
Posts: 1,181
Does this mean the SS Camaro is an overweight pig also??

Or, is 3820lbs on a Mustang, a pig.............. and 3860lbs on a Camaro, a good solid platform??
94LightningGal is offline  


Quick Reply: Gt500: Loses weight, get's faster avoids gas guzzler tax.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.