Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #16  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Originally Posted by ImportedRoomate
I also got 17mpg, when I first got my truck. After about 500mi Ive gotten 20-21mpg ever since.
Also, Ive raced my friend with an 05 Dakota with the V8 and we stayed neck and neck from a 20mph roll up to 70 when we shut it down. I actually edged on him a little. That little I5 can hold its own I do agree though that it would suck in a fullsize.
I got 18-19mpg over the winter, but ever since I broke 10,000mi about 2 months ago I've been getting 20-21mpg with 21.4mpg being my best. I have the 3.73 gears and my truck feels about as strong as my 3800 V6 Grand Prix did. 4.8L is the perfect mix of fuel economy and power for those who would want more out of there Colorado.

The I5 with a boost up to 240HP would be fine in 2wd Silverados with the W/T package. Basically I'd only use it were the V6 was used in the past.

It will be interesting to see if the 400HP 6.0L is offered in the 1500 Silverados, I doubt it, unless other 1500's get 400HP. It will probably be used just in the Escalade and Denali and many the regular Silverado SS (with the S/C SS getting a superchared LS2)
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #17  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Is the 6.0 going to be available in the standard GM trucks, or only the suburban/luxury/performance/three-quarter ton setups?

Even so, the 5.3 will be very competetive with everyone else's offerings.

So it is confirmed that these motors even though they have retained their previous displacements, are based on the LS2?

The 6.0L makes ~ the same power in the trucks as it does the Vette. Is this just by chance or are they nearly identical motors?
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #18  
Ken S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,368
From: OR
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

what about the transmissions of the GMT900? They are going to be the 6 speed auto's right? Anyone know of the stats of them?
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #19  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Originally Posted by Ken S
what about the transmissions of the GMT900? They are going to be the 6 speed auto's right? Anyone know of the stats of them?
Yes they will get the 6 speed autos.

I Assume the rumors of the V10 being canceled are true since the 8.1L is still around.
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 09:51 PM
  #20  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Originally Posted by Z28x
Yes they will get the 6 speed autos.

I Assume the rumors of the V10 being canceled are true since the 8.1L is still around.
How sweet would it be to see the 8.1 go Aluminum and get DOD?

I know a lot of hot rodders would drool over that setup, especially with the 6 speed auto!
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 05:41 AM
  #21  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

That would be a lot of investment considering how limited production the engine really is, and not being based off either Gen III or Gen IV (Hell..Gen I or II even...its Mark IV), that would be a heavy investment for an engine that I have never seen in a Chevy truck.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 05:47 AM
  #22  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Originally Posted by Threxx
The 6.0L makes ~ the same power in the trucks as it does the Vette. Is this just by chance or are they nearly identical motors?
The 6 liter in the trucks won't be an "LS2" per se. Even though peak horsepower and torque are about the same, I'm guessing the torque curves will be different. The LS2 should spin more RPMs too. One is for use in a sports car and the other for a heavy duty truck.

Last edited by Z28Wilson; Jun 21, 2005 at 05:50 AM.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 06:10 AM
  #23  
DrewSG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 627
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Same block, different heads and cams.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 07:15 AM
  #24  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

My father-in-law has the Vortec 8100 with the Allison 5 speed auto in his 2005 GMC Sierra 2500HD...

He has a 24' trailer (for cars)... we hauled the 67 SS396 Chevelle back to it's owner this weekend... the first time we've trailered with the new truck. It is a NIGHT AND DAY difference between that 8100/Allison and his 2003 Silverado that had a 6.0/5.7 (Whatever the medium V8 was in 03)

In short, the 8100 is very much worth it if you are going to actually use it....
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #25  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Betcha that has a lot to do with the Allison.

Methinks the Allison needs to be marketed more heavily. Really throw it out there like DCX has with the Hemi.

Besides, you could show pictures of some of Allison's earlier successes... like the P-38 Lightning with twin V-1710's gunning down a Zero or three...

After that, get Pratt and Whitney to build an engine for ya and you've closed the whole loop. Then you can show Hellcats and Corsairs and Thunderbolts...

Preferably with Iron Maiden playing in the background...

But seriously, I think the Allison should be played up a bit more than it is. It's a hell of a transmission.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #26  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Originally Posted by PacerX
Betcha that has a lot to do with the Allison.

Methinks the Allison needs to be marketed more heavily. Really throw it out there like DCX has with the Hemi.

Besides, you could show pictures of some of Allison's earlier successes... like the P-38 Lightning with twin V-1710's gunning down a Zero or three...

After that, get Pratt and Whitney to build an engine for ya and you've closed the whole loop. Then you can show Hellcats and Corsairs and Thunderbolts...

Preferably with Iron Maiden playing in the background...

But seriously, I think the Allison should be played up a bit more than it is. It's a hell of a transmission.
It would without a doubt not hit anything close to the impact and word of mouth hoopla that the Hemi has and still is. The average consumer does NOT... I repeat, NOT, get excited about a transmission. Most people out there don't even really know completely what a transmission is exactly or how many gears they have... much less its manufacturer, predicted durability, etc, etc.

Preaching Allison transmissions to the truck market may be a good short marketing campaign among many others... but I don't think it's going to make any giant impact on its own, at all.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #27  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Originally Posted by Threxx
It would without a doubt not hit anything close to the impact and word of mouth hoopla that the Hemi has and still is. The average consumer does NOT... I repeat, NOT, get excited about a transmission. Most people out there don't even really know completely what a transmission is exactly or how many gears they have... much less its manufacturer, predicted durability, etc, etc.

Preaching Allison transmissions to the truck market may be a good short marketing campaign among many others... but I don't think it's going to make any giant impact on its own, at all.
I think that you would be right about sedans and vehicles for the general public but the people who buy these workhorses alreday know about the Allison and they love it. It would only help to increase the knowlege base of the buyers and give your truck something the competition doesn't have.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 09:10 AM
  #28  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
I think that you would be right about sedans and vehicles for the general public but the people who buy these workhorses alreday know about the Allison and they love it. It would only help to increase the knowlege base of the buyers and give your truck something the competition doesn't have.
I think that for the niche market that would be interested in workhorses with Allison transmissions, that would be a great marketing tool. But again, we're talking about niche marketing. The Hemi was about as far from niche marketing as you can get, because it has spread among performance car enthusiasts, family dads, soccer moms, and truck guys alike.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #29  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Another interesting tidbit about the 8100/Allison vs the 5.7( or 6.0?)/4 speed is that we actually got one MPG BETTER on our trip towing the Chevelle back to the owner than we did with the old truck when we picked it up....

I'm going to assume that the extra gear made a big difference there, being that the engine is much bigger, yet it still got better economy towing.
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #30  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Re: GMT900 5.3L V8 = 355HP/380tq

Well when you unhooked the trailer the 8.1 probably still got the same mileage.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.