GM top Exec. don't want to give up anything?

As it stands right now we actually can't pay for jack sh*t, so every dime that government hands out as corporate welfare just make the dollar more and more worthless, which is something that will effect everyone.
F*ck the terrorists, America is being destroyed by Paulson & Bernanke.
I don't begrunge Rick his generous compensation - he has an agreement in place with the Board of Directors that presumably can be terminated at any time.
That being said, I think that GM's board is guilty of malfeasance that borders on treason for what it's allowed to happen in the US industry on its watch.
That being said, I think that GM's board is guilty of malfeasance that borders on treason for what it's allowed to happen in the US industry on its watch.
Would it be that bad for GM if the whole board were replaced? Maybe recruit some Japanese car execs and have them work in Detroit?
http://www.gm.com/corporate/investor..._gov/board.jsp
There seems to be a lack of automotive expertise on the board. While I understand you want a good contingent of process, executive, compliance, and business people... I sure wouldn't mind a couple of people familiar with how to run a car company on that board. Maybe the bios I checked just don't reflect this information.
There seems to be a lack of automotive expertise on the board. While I understand you want a good contingent of process, executive, compliance, and business people... I sure wouldn't mind a couple of people familiar with how to run a car company on that board. Maybe the bios I checked just don't reflect this information.
Here is a reasonable look at the total cost per hour of the Gulfstream V. Keep in mind, they probably only take on fuel in Detroit at a contract price. http://www.planequest.com/operationc...nfo.asp?id=125
To keep is simple, you can figure 2.5 hours round trip (DTW to IAD and back). Seems a little less than 20k to me? What do you think??
To keep is simple, you can figure 2.5 hours round trip (DTW to IAD and back). Seems a little less than 20k to me? What do you think??
Last edited by oneledvr; Nov 19, 2008 at 08:22 PM.
http://www.gm.com/corporate/investor..._gov/board.jsp
There seems to be a lack of automotive expertise on the board. While I understand you want a good contingent of process, executive, compliance, and business people... I sure wouldn't mind a couple of people familiar with how to run a car company on that board. Maybe the bios I checked just don't reflect this information.
There seems to be a lack of automotive expertise on the board. While I understand you want a good contingent of process, executive, compliance, and business people... I sure wouldn't mind a couple of people familiar with how to run a car company on that board. Maybe the bios I checked just don't reflect this information.
It's not a recipe for success when your board thinks, "Oh, well, if this folds up I can move on to General Foods or Proctor and Gamble or Johnson and Johnson and do the same thing"--and not give two craps where they work or what they work on!
Truthfully, I'm pretty unconcerned about these CEO's salaries or that Wagoner took the corporate jet. These are people in the big leagues, I don't expect them to work for free or take a commercial flight, when the company jet is a more efficient way to travel with your staff as you prepare for an important meeting. I do however expect them to perform.
I'd like to ask RW three questions:
1) Why didn't your partnership with Subaru work?
2) What series of events made you feel it was a good idea to sell control of your finance arm?
3) Do you think that allowing Fiat to manipulate you into paying $6 billion, in order so you could share intellectual property in one of their diesel engines, is good value for the shareholders?
But of course, from what I've seen on those hearings, the Senators were merely pandering to the cameras.
I'd like to ask RW three questions:
1) Why didn't your partnership with Subaru work?
2) What series of events made you feel it was a good idea to sell control of your finance arm?
3) Do you think that allowing Fiat to manipulate you into paying $6 billion, in order so you could share intellectual property in one of their diesel engines, is good value for the shareholders?
But of course, from what I've seen on those hearings, the Senators were merely pandering to the cameras.
Last edited by Z284ever; Nov 19, 2008 at 10:22 PM.
In the big picture, the cost of using their private jets (most of the expense of which is probably already a sunk cost anyway) is not really significant.
What is significant is how completely stupid it is for someone to use their private jet to fly to DC so that they can beg for taxpayer money...if the Detroit Three don't get their bailout, you can likely place a lot of the blame on the arrogance of these guys, especially Wagoner.
What is significant is how completely stupid it is for someone to use their private jet to fly to DC so that they can beg for taxpayer money...if the Detroit Three don't get their bailout, you can likely place a lot of the blame on the arrogance of these guys, especially Wagoner.
Here is a reasonable look at the total cost per hour of the Gulfstream V. Keep in mind, they probably only take on fuel in Detroit at a contract price. http://www.planequest.com/operationc...nfo.asp?id=125
To keep is simple, you can figure 2.5 hours round trip (DTW to IAD and back). Seems a little less than 20k to me? What do you think??
To keep is simple, you can figure 2.5 hours round trip (DTW to IAD and back). Seems a little less than 20k to me? What do you think??

If I was paying somebody $25,000,000 a year (i.e. Alan from Ford) I'd sure want his flight time to be minimized, and productive. If he works even up to 4,000 hours/year, that's still $6250 an hour. Even if there were only a few high paid guys on one corporate jet, it's worth the price of the flight just to keep them productive.
Further, if the private jet got him to DC a couple hours faster, and that even slightly helped the odds of getting the 25B due to one more meeting with key politicians, that would justify the time saved, hands down.
You guys making professional wages, would you take a bus 10 miles to work at the expense of a half hour lost time every day, just to save a buck or 5 in gas? I sure wouldn't. Same thing, different numbers.
Further, if the private jet got him to DC a couple hours faster, and that even slightly helped the odds of getting the 25B due to one more meeting with key politicians, that would justify the time saved, hands down.
You guys making professional wages, would you take a bus 10 miles to work at the expense of a half hour lost time every day, just to save a buck or 5 in gas? I sure wouldn't. Same thing, different numbers.
And, there is no doubt your 1st hour fuel burn is way higher than each additional hour you fly. However, from an accounting perspective, when your figuring direct operating costs per hour, that's it. You really don't account for short trips verse long trips. Bottom line is, 20k for the D.C. trip is an excessive & uninformed statement.
Last edited by oneledvr; Nov 19, 2008 at 08:43 PM.


