GM to begin rollout of Displacement On Demand.
Originally posted by PGR
My '94, in sixth gear, would be turning approx. 2700rpm at 110mph. At that rpm, the engine is making maybe 150hp . Deactivate 4 cylinders, and its down to 75hp. Probably not enough hp to maintain 110 mph. At 80mph, with 4 cylinders, aprrox. 57 hp. This might be reasonable. At 60mph, on 4 cylinders, approx. 43 hp. No problem.
BTW, both Ford and Daimler Chrysler are trying to catch up with GM's D.O.D. The new Hemi 5.7 was originally going to be a OHC version of their 4.7, but because D.O.D. was more expensive to apply to their OHC design, they dropped it in favour of a pushrod design. What will Ford do? They seemed to have embraced OHC on most if not all of their V8 engines.
My '94, in sixth gear, would be turning approx. 2700rpm at 110mph. At that rpm, the engine is making maybe 150hp . Deactivate 4 cylinders, and its down to 75hp. Probably not enough hp to maintain 110 mph. At 80mph, with 4 cylinders, aprrox. 57 hp. This might be reasonable. At 60mph, on 4 cylinders, approx. 43 hp. No problem.
BTW, both Ford and Daimler Chrysler are trying to catch up with GM's D.O.D. The new Hemi 5.7 was originally going to be a OHC version of their 4.7, but because D.O.D. was more expensive to apply to their OHC design, they dropped it in favour of a pushrod design. What will Ford do? They seemed to have embraced OHC on most if not all of their V8 engines.

Obviously, (almost
) noone maintain 100mph on the freeway, so DOD should work well at normal highway speeds, and even if you are going fast enough at a constant speed where 4 cylinders won't cut it, I'm assuming the computer will bring 2 additional cylinders online and fire on 6 to maintain enough power to keep the speed. And if that is not enough, it will bring all 8 cylinders online...As GM has said, it is 'seemless' so , I'd think the computer is setup to account for all of these situations!
A constant 80mph in a Cadillac STS (big, heavy and boxy... not the slipperiest car in the world) took about 72hp in 1993.
We were doing measurements at the time to provide a look-see at what happened when the engine went into "limp home" mode due to coolant loss, and how the transmission could help it out.
What we found out was that the engine was capable of running indefinitely on 4 (alternating) cylinders at 70mph without much throttle input.
At that point, even though I was not a GM employee, I started cooking up a way in my head to physically break the motor in half at the crankshaft and have it run as a V4 on one half and completely shut down the other.
See, even the GM DOD system wastes energy by spinning the deactivated pistons. This is 100% wasted effort.
What I came up with conceptually was a magnetic clutch that was capable of switching fast enough to re-align the crankshaft into the proper phasing if one half was at 6000rpm and the other was at rest. The half of the crankshaft at rest would be progressively "dragged" up to speed and the clutch would switch on and off quickly enough to allow the the crankshafts to "slip" relative to each other until they came into phase. Firing order and cam timing would be varied to assist the "dead" half in spinning up.
I proposed the concept to my boss (VP of R&D at the company I worked for) and even came up with some concept sketches, but he figured it was beyond our scope to pursue.
Oh well.... I still think about it though.
We were doing measurements at the time to provide a look-see at what happened when the engine went into "limp home" mode due to coolant loss, and how the transmission could help it out.
What we found out was that the engine was capable of running indefinitely on 4 (alternating) cylinders at 70mph without much throttle input.
At that point, even though I was not a GM employee, I started cooking up a way in my head to physically break the motor in half at the crankshaft and have it run as a V4 on one half and completely shut down the other.
See, even the GM DOD system wastes energy by spinning the deactivated pistons. This is 100% wasted effort.
What I came up with conceptually was a magnetic clutch that was capable of switching fast enough to re-align the crankshaft into the proper phasing if one half was at 6000rpm and the other was at rest. The half of the crankshaft at rest would be progressively "dragged" up to speed and the clutch would switch on and off quickly enough to allow the the crankshafts to "slip" relative to each other until they came into phase. Firing order and cam timing would be varied to assist the "dead" half in spinning up.
I proposed the concept to my boss (VP of R&D at the company I worked for) and even came up with some concept sketches, but he figured it was beyond our scope to pursue.
Oh well.... I still think about it though.
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Why do I get the feeling that the people opposed to this have no idea how this system works?
It doesn't matter how fast you drive!
You could average 110mph on the freeway, but once you get up to 110, I doubt you need to be firing all 8 cylinders to maintain the speed... that is where the savings is... and that is where most driving time is spend... at cruising speed... not accelerating.
Why do I get the feeling that the people opposed to this have no idea how this system works?

It doesn't matter how fast you drive!
You could average 110mph on the freeway, but once you get up to 110, I doubt you need to be firing all 8 cylinders to maintain the speed... that is where the savings is... and that is where most driving time is spend... at cruising speed... not accelerating.
Just nitpikin' here but 2 things posted are wrong.
The DOD is a 8-4 mode---there is no 6 clyinder mode--like there was on Cadillacs 8-6-4 system.
At a cruise rpm 2700rpm I doubt your engine is making 150hp.
Why? That sounds like a hp figure at Full-throttle.
But I get your point.
The DOD is a 8-4 mode---there is no 6 clyinder mode--like there was on Cadillacs 8-6-4 system.
At a cruise rpm 2700rpm I doubt your engine is making 150hp.
Why? That sounds like a hp figure at Full-throttle.
But I get your point.
Last edited by 305fan; Jan 17, 2003 at 05:04 PM.
Originally posted by 305fan
The DOD is a 8-4 mode---there is no 6 clyinder mode--like there was on Cadillacs 8-6-4 system.
The DOD is a 8-4 mode---there is no 6 clyinder mode--like there was on Cadillacs 8-6-4 system.
Thank you for the correction.
Originally posted by 305fan
At a cruise rpm 2700rpm I doubt your engine is making 150hp.
Why? That sounds like a hp figure at Full-throttle.
But I get your point.
At a cruise rpm 2700rpm I doubt your engine is making 150hp.
Why? That sounds like a hp figure at Full-throttle.
But I get your point.
Just trying to make a very rough stab at how much hp is possible at a given rpm/mph. With D.O.D., the throttle is a fly by wire like the Vette, the PCM opens the throttle further in 4 cylinder mode. The engine operates at a much higher volumetric efficiency than in 8 cylinder mode with a slightly opened throttle.
This is one reason that diesel engines are so efficient - they are always operating at W.O.T., because they have no throttle blade.
Originally posted by PacerX
See, even the GM DOD system wastes energy by spinning the deactivated pistons. This is 100% wasted effort.
See, even the GM DOD system wastes energy by spinning the deactivated pistons. This is 100% wasted effort.
With D.O.D., the wasted energy is primarily the friction of the piston rings. The valves are closed, and no air is actually pumped through the deactvated cylinders. The air is trapped, and just compresses and expands, and acts as a spring, storing and releasing energy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmsmith
2016+ Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and General Discussion
7
Sep 14, 2015 09:25 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 11, 2015 09:44 AM
cmsmith
2016+ Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and General Discussion
2
Aug 9, 2015 07:30 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 3, 2015 08:42 AM





