Ford GT Performance Numbers from C&D
jeez scott, don't have to make a reply to every post
but, just to check you here, the camaro wasn't dropped because gm didn't want to just say "the he** with the pony car market"
do a search and you'll find the valid reasons for its demise, like darth zed said somewhere in that long line of posts you had
no offense intended scott, keep the thread going
but, just to check you here, the camaro wasn't dropped because gm didn't want to just say "the he** with the pony car market"
do a search and you'll find the valid reasons for its demise, like darth zed said somewhere in that long line of posts you had
no offense intended scott, keep the thread going
Originally posted by stars1010
Yeah dumba$$, how do you think I made it to my second year?
Your not worth arguing with...this wont go anywhere.
Yeah dumba$$, how do you think I made it to my second year?
Your not worth arguing with...this wont go anywhere.
wned:
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Been over that countless times here...
Contracts (with unions and governments) , and more importantly... the lack of a suitable RWD platform... the contract will expire, and we now have a few RWD platforms available...
Camaro is on track, though I won't compare numbers yet... we fon't know them.
Been over that countless times here...
Contracts (with unions and governments) , and more importantly... the lack of a suitable RWD platform... the contract will expire, and we now have a few RWD platforms available...
Camaro is on track, though I won't compare numbers yet... we fon't know them.
Originally posted by scott9050
Yeah, Bob is only a respected racer and Navy man who has been in many different car magazines since the late 80's. Who are you again?
Yeah, Bob is only a respected racer and Navy man who has been in many different car magazines since the late 80's. Who are you again?
Not worth the time.
Last edited by PacerX; Dec 1, 2003 at 10:50 PM.
Originally posted by scott9050
Pacer X may be right some of the time, but he comes across like a 14 year old kid in this post. Keep all of this "I will lose my job crap" off the board, no one at GM knows you here, so if you are worried, use a fake username from a computer than can not be traced and spill your guts.
Pacer X may be right some of the time, but he comes across like a 14 year old kid in this post. Keep all of this "I will lose my job crap" off the board, no one at GM knows you here, so if you are worried, use a fake username from a computer than can not be traced and spill your guts.
And about the 96 Cobra, maybe I am a bit bias. My friend owned one for two weeks. He sold his 95 Trans AM, picked up the Cobra and was so discussed with he performance that he sold it for a 98 Trans Am. In the end he ended up with a pretty good deal. But I've only seen one 4.6L in person that ran hard. Had everything (125shot) except a rotating assembly and was in the 11s. Cool car looked like a stock GT.
Its funny sitting here writing this because this argument could on and on for days. I keep thinking of comebacks for my own arguments and so on.
These arguments on the board just tire me out. I'm just going to walk away from this. You can have the victory Bob. I sat there watching my movie thinking of many different comebacks. Some were pretty good, but I don’t see a point. You win, whatever
I'm going to sleep and dream about how fast ‘96 SS are.
Originally posted by scott9050
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by stars1010
Yeah dumba$$, how do you think I made it to my second year?
Your not worth arguing with...this wont go anywhere.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, Bob owned your *** with hard factswned:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by stars1010
Yeah dumba$$, how do you think I made it to my second year?
Your not worth arguing with...this wont go anywhere.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, Bob owned your *** with hard factswned:
Yet another thread that has turned completely redicuous, Thanks alot Ford guys.
My thoughts on the Ford GT: Kudos for Ford on making an impressive fast car. Too bad its butt ugly IMO they could have done better with the 40 year old styling.
After seeing the SF pics. of the C6 I'll take it any day over a GT
My thoughts on the Ford GT: Kudos for Ford on making an impressive fast car. Too bad its butt ugly IMO they could have done better with the 40 year old styling.
After seeing the SF pics. of the C6 I'll take it any day over a GT
Originally posted by stars1010
And how did he "own" me with this statement?
And how did he "own" me with this statement?
BTW, I'm a 2nd year ME student too.
Originally posted by 30thZ286speed
Yet another thread that has turned completely redicuous, Thanks alot Ford guys.
Yet another thread that has turned completely redicuous, Thanks alot Ford guys.
Originally posted by Steve0
I dont think the Ford guys ruined the thread... I think it started with the GM guys bashing the Ford. Especially those who did so with imaginary cars that no one has seen yet.
I dont think the Ford guys ruined the thread... I think it started with the GM guys bashing the Ford. Especially those who did so with imaginary cars that no one has seen yet.
Any first year mechanical engineering student knows that torque is more important than horsepower for flat out accelleration... especially at a lower rpm range.
I'll take 325 lbf-ft @ 2400 rpm versus 300 lbf-ft @ 4800 rpm any day of the week. (How many of you frequently drive at 4800 rpm anyway??? ... ok maybe a few of you closet tuners with high reving four bangers, but for us American V8 owners...
)
I'll take 325 lbf-ft @ 2400 rpm versus 300 lbf-ft @ 4800 rpm any day of the week. (How many of you frequently drive at 4800 rpm anyway??? ... ok maybe a few of you closet tuners with high reving four bangers, but for us American V8 owners...
)
In plain english, no one is going to be constantly driving at 4800 rpm on the street. Most street V8's are running between 2000-4000 rpm tops. For a drag racing application 4800 rpm wouldn't be a handicap, and in that circumstance Bob is correct. However no where was it ever implied that we were talking about drag only applications, and in fact everyone was bragging about street car performance.
Its easy to sound like a damn genius half the time if you slant everyone else's opinions to feed your own one-sided arguments.
But then I really could care less what some narrow-minded Ford guys think. Come to think of it, why is it Ford guys are always on GM sites yet you don't see as many Chevy guys on Ford sites? Hmmmmm.
Last edited by jg95z28; Dec 2, 2003 at 02:02 AM.
Pretty impressive on the GT performance. Ford hit a home run on this one. That trap speed means the GT is around a 10.8@130+ car with a half decent driver.
Now on to the dissenters.
Huh? I'll take Modern Musclecars for $500 Alex.
Answer:This car makes 425hp even though factory rated at 390 compared to the Z06 which makes its rated 405hp.
Ding! What is the the '03 Cobra?
Correct!
I believe our strident loud mouth insider is a seat engineer at a supplier to the general, judging from an earlier thread on the intracacies of welding and frames. Yup. From that commanding position he KNOWS all the developments at GM powertrain before even Fritz Indra.
A $60K Z06 that traps 130mph in the 1/4 mile? Only six months to go before this one gets eaten. And what's this other ridiculous stuff? Hypothetical Camaros having nothing to fear from 500+hp Cobras? 400hp Vettes romping on 500+hp Cobras? You're losing it, friend.
The GT basically romps over everything this side of the Enzo. I highly doubt the ZL1 will get built. But on paper it should run at least as fast as the GT. 625hp <3100lbs. But don't forget area under the curve of the torque chart. The twin screw SC mod motors make huge fat torque bands from stop to top, an edge they will continue to have over everything else.
As for the Z06, it's gonna be great car. It will most probably outrun the '06 Cobra and be the best sports car for the money, again. And that's good. But forget this going after and beating the GT crap. Seriously.
Now on to the dissenters.
Originally posted by BigDarknFast
Huh? Tell me, which current production Ford has more HP and performance value than the current Z06? Perhaps... it's this FantasyLand GT
I just hope I will be able to tell the new GT apart from its many kit-car clones already out and about....
Huh? Tell me, which current production Ford has more HP and performance value than the current Z06? Perhaps... it's this FantasyLand GT

I just hope I will be able to tell the new GT apart from its many kit-car clones already out and about....
Answer:This car makes 425hp even though factory rated at 390 compared to the Z06 which makes its rated 405hp.
Ding! What is the the '03 Cobra?
Correct!
Originally posted by Snorman
ROTFLMAO! Who are you, Bob Lutz? Another Fantasyland candidate!
ROTFLMAO! Who are you, Bob Lutz? Another Fantasyland candidate!
Originally posted by PacerX
Camaros will have no issues whatsoever with any Cobra F*rd decides to build. Dead stock, run-of-the-mill C6's will have nothing to fear from Cobras. The Z06 will match the GT step-for-step, and the ZL1 is quite literally going to blow everything else on the market away short of $600,000 Ferraris.
I know from whence I speak.
Camaros will have no issues whatsoever with any Cobra F*rd decides to build. Dead stock, run-of-the-mill C6's will have nothing to fear from Cobras. The Z06 will match the GT step-for-step, and the ZL1 is quite literally going to blow everything else on the market away short of $600,000 Ferraris.
I know from whence I speak.
The GT basically romps over everything this side of the Enzo. I highly doubt the ZL1 will get built. But on paper it should run at least as fast as the GT. 625hp <3100lbs. But don't forget area under the curve of the torque chart. The twin screw SC mod motors make huge fat torque bands from stop to top, an edge they will continue to have over everything else.
As for the Z06, it's gonna be great car. It will most probably outrun the '06 Cobra and be the best sports car for the money, again. And that's good. But forget this going after and beating the GT crap. Seriously.
Originally posted by hp_nut
A $60K Z06
A $60K Z06
But forget this going after and beating the GT crap. Seriously.
No matter what you have, there is something out there that is faster. Period. I know of some street-driven F-body owners in this area who must be frothing at the mouth to roll up on a snobby unsuspecting GT owner.
So after listening to ProudPony wisely telling me not to say Ford can't do something, don't sit there and say with all of GM's resources and history for building some wicked stuff (usually more economically than anyone else mind you) they can't pull something off either.
Originally posted by PacerX
***EDITED OUT THE FLAMES***
Not worth the time.
***EDITED OUT THE FLAMES***
Not worth the time.
Originally posted by stars1010
But I've only seen one 4.6L in person that ran hard. Had everything (125shot) except a rotating assembly and was in the 11s.
But I've only seen one 4.6L in person that ran hard. Had everything (125shot) except a rotating assembly and was in the 11s.
Its funny sitting here writing this because this argument could on and on for days. I keep thinking of comebacks for my own arguments and so on.
These arguments on the board just tire me out. I'm just going to walk away from this.
You can have the victory Bob.
I sat there watching my movie thinking of many different comebacks. Some were pretty good, but I don’t see a point. You win, whatever
I'm going to sleep and dream about how fast ‘96 SS are.

(psst...that was a joke)
Originally posted by 30thZ286speed
Thanks alot Ford guys.
Thanks alot Ford guys.
Originally posted by jg95z28
Of course I was talking about real-life street cars and not a drag only application.
Of course I was talking about real-life street cars and not a drag only application.
In plain english
no one is going to be constantly driving at 4800 rpm on the street.
Most street V8's are running between 2000-4000 rpm tops.
For a drag racing application 4800 rpm wouldn't be a handicap, and in that circumstance Bob is correct.
However no where was it ever implied that we were talking about drag only applications, and in fact everyone was bragging about street car performance.
Its easy to sound like a damn genius half the time if you slant everyone else's opinions to feed your own one-sided arguments.
But then I really could care less what some narrow-minded Ford guys think.
Come to think of it, why is it Ford guys are always on GM sites yet you don't see as many Chevy guys on Ford sites? Hmmmmm.
And BTW, not only am I an "enthusiast" vice any single-brand car guy, I've also been around here quite a bit longer than the majority of the people in this thread - including the time I owned my 99 T/A. Draw whatever conclusions you wish to.....or not.
Originally posted by FlyBono24
The Super-Corvette will blow it away, and it will do it with a $100,000 LOWER price tag!!
The Super-Corvette will blow it away, and it will do it with a $100,000 LOWER price tag!!
You heard it here first. Note this on your calender.
Mark....I agree totally with your comments. Kudos to you. One exception....I think the reference to the $60k Z06 was for future models, not the current version.

I'm off to the airport...ya'll have fun today.
Originally posted by PacerX
***EDITED OUT THE FLAMES***
Not worth the time.
***EDITED OUT THE FLAMES***
Not worth the time.
It's about a former gunfighter who is doing his best to avoid gunfights.....until the end when he literally runs amok in a gunfight kill-a-thon.
Good movie.


