Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Ford GT Performance Numbers from C&D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 10:25 PM
  #91  
unvc92camarors's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,769
From: cinci
jeez scott, don't have to make a reply to every post

but, just to check you here, the camaro wasn't dropped because gm didn't want to just say "the he** with the pony car market"
do a search and you'll find the valid reasons for its demise, like darth zed said somewhere in that long line of posts you had

no offense intended scott, keep the thread going
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 10:26 PM
  #92  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Originally posted by stars1010
Yeah dumba$$, how do you think I made it to my second year?

Your not worth arguing with...this wont go anywhere.
Sorry, Bob owned your *** with hard factswned:
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #93  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Been over that countless times here...

Contracts (with unions and governments) , and more importantly... the lack of a suitable RWD platform... the contract will expire, and we now have a few RWD platforms available...

Camaro is on track, though I won't compare numbers yet... we fon't know them.
I hope you are right, I am an f-body fan but I don't trust GM worth a damn. If and when they come out I might just buy one, my wife wants an LS-1 Camaro at present, but if a new one is just a few years away I might just save for one. I don't like the next generation stang, too damn ugly with that retro thing going on....
Old Dec 1, 2003 | 10:48 PM
  #94  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Originally posted by scott9050
Yeah, Bob is only a respected racer and Navy man who has been in many different car magazines since the late 80's. Who are you again?
***EDITED OUT THE FLAMES***

Not worth the time.

Last edited by PacerX; Dec 1, 2003 at 10:50 PM.
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 12:01 AM
  #95  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Originally posted by scott9050
Pacer X may be right some of the time, but he comes across like a 14 year old kid in this post. Keep all of this "I will lose my job crap" off the board, no one at GM knows you here, so if you are worried, use a fake username from a computer than can not be traced and spill your guts.
You are wrong here. Its a well know fact people from GM surf these boards.

And about the 96 Cobra, maybe I am a bit bias. My friend owned one for two weeks. He sold his 95 Trans AM, picked up the Cobra and was so discussed with he performance that he sold it for a 98 Trans Am. In the end he ended up with a pretty good deal. But I've only seen one 4.6L in person that ran hard. Had everything (125shot) except a rotating assembly and was in the 11s. Cool car looked like a stock GT.

Its funny sitting here writing this because this argument could on and on for days. I keep thinking of comebacks for my own arguments and so on.

These arguments on the board just tire me out. I'm just going to walk away from this. You can have the victory Bob. I sat there watching my movie thinking of many different comebacks. Some were pretty good, but I don’t see a point. You win, whatever I'm going to sleep and dream about how fast ‘96 SS are.


Originally posted by scott9050
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by stars1010
Yeah dumba$$, how do you think I made it to my second year?

Your not worth arguing with...this wont go anywhere.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Sorry, Bob owned your *** with hard factswned:
And how did he "own" me with this statement?
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 01:06 AM
  #96  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Yet another thread that has turned completely redicuous, Thanks alot Ford guys.

My thoughts on the Ford GT: Kudos for Ford on making an impressive fast car. Too bad its butt ugly IMO they could have done better with the 40 year old styling.

After seeing the SF pics. of the C6 I'll take it any day over a GT
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 01:08 AM
  #97  
Steve0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,327
From: Hartford, CT
Originally posted by stars1010
And how did he "own" me with this statement?
I think it has to do with yours and JG's misconceptions dealing with engine powercurves, gearing and their relation to acceleration.

BTW, I'm a 2nd year ME student too.
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 01:11 AM
  #98  
Steve0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,327
From: Hartford, CT
Originally posted by 30thZ286speed
Yet another thread that has turned completely redicuous, Thanks alot Ford guys.
I dont think the Ford guys ruined the thread... I think it started with the GM guys bashing the Ford. Especially those who did so with imaginary cars that no one has seen yet.
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 01:19 AM
  #99  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Originally posted by Steve0
I dont think the Ford guys ruined the thread... I think it started with the GM guys bashing the Ford. Especially those who did so with imaginary cars that no one has seen yet.
No...... I think the Ford guys did with there "Ford vs. GM horsepower war(Yah might be a redneck if......) that got turned into another one of those Camaro vs. Cobra threads"
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 02:00 AM
  #100  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Any first year mechanical engineering student knows that torque is more important than horsepower for flat out accelleration... especially at a lower rpm range.

I'll take 325 lbf-ft @ 2400 rpm versus 300 lbf-ft @ 4800 rpm any day of the week. (How many of you frequently drive at 4800 rpm anyway??? ... ok maybe a few of you closet tuners with high reving four bangers, but for us American V8 owners... )
Of course I was talking about real-life street cars and not a drag only application.

In plain english, no one is going to be constantly driving at 4800 rpm on the street. Most street V8's are running between 2000-4000 rpm tops. For a drag racing application 4800 rpm wouldn't be a handicap, and in that circumstance Bob is correct. However no where was it ever implied that we were talking about drag only applications, and in fact everyone was bragging about street car performance.

Its easy to sound like a damn genius half the time if you slant everyone else's opinions to feed your own one-sided arguments.

But then I really could care less what some narrow-minded Ford guys think. Come to think of it, why is it Ford guys are always on GM sites yet you don't see as many Chevy guys on Ford sites? Hmmmmm.


Last edited by jg95z28; Dec 2, 2003 at 02:02 AM.
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 02:19 AM
  #101  
hp_nut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 293
From: Hou,TX
Pretty impressive on the GT performance. Ford hit a home run on this one. That trap speed means the GT is around a 10.8@130+ car with a half decent driver.

Now on to the dissenters.

Originally posted by BigDarknFast
Huh? Tell me, which current production Ford has more HP and performance value than the current Z06? Perhaps... it's this FantasyLand GT

I just hope I will be able to tell the new GT apart from its many kit-car clones already out and about....
Huh? I'll take Modern Musclecars for $500 Alex.

Answer:This car makes 425hp even though factory rated at 390 compared to the Z06 which makes its rated 405hp.

Ding! What is the the '03 Cobra?

Correct!

Originally posted by Snorman
ROTFLMAO! Who are you, Bob Lutz? Another Fantasyland candidate!
I believe our strident loud mouth insider is a seat engineer at a supplier to the general, judging from an earlier thread on the intracacies of welding and frames. Yup. From that commanding position he KNOWS all the developments at GM powertrain before even Fritz Indra.

Originally posted by PacerX
Camaros will have no issues whatsoever with any Cobra F*rd decides to build. Dead stock, run-of-the-mill C6's will have nothing to fear from Cobras. The Z06 will match the GT step-for-step, and the ZL1 is quite literally going to blow everything else on the market away short of $600,000 Ferraris.

I know from whence I speak.
A $60K Z06 that traps 130mph in the 1/4 mile? Only six months to go before this one gets eaten. And what's this other ridiculous stuff? Hypothetical Camaros having nothing to fear from 500+hp Cobras? 400hp Vettes romping on 500+hp Cobras? You're losing it, friend.





The GT basically romps over everything this side of the Enzo. I highly doubt the ZL1 will get built. But on paper it should run at least as fast as the GT. 625hp <3100lbs. But don't forget area under the curve of the torque chart. The twin screw SC mod motors make huge fat torque bands from stop to top, an edge they will continue to have over everything else.

As for the Z06, it's gonna be great car. It will most probably outrun the '06 Cobra and be the best sports car for the money, again. And that's good. But forget this going after and beating the GT crap. Seriously.
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 05:34 AM
  #102  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by hp_nut
A $60K Z06
$60k? Where did you get that number from? I've heard of new Z06's being had for $15k less (shop around!), but whatever.....

But forget this going after and beating the GT crap. Seriously.
GT is very impressive as anyone can see. But you are forgetting the #1 rule about the performance car world....repeat after me....

No matter what you have, there is something out there that is faster. Period. I know of some street-driven F-body owners in this area who must be frothing at the mouth to roll up on a snobby unsuspecting GT owner.

So after listening to ProudPony wisely telling me not to say Ford can't do something, don't sit there and say with all of GM's resources and history for building some wicked stuff (usually more economically than anyone else mind you) they can't pull something off either.
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 07:47 AM
  #103  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally posted by PacerX
***EDITED OUT THE FLAMES***

Not worth the time.
So you wrote a "flaming response", then decided it wasn't worth your time - after you had already taken that time to do it. Interesting logic.

Originally posted by stars1010
But I've only seen one 4.6L in person that ran hard. Had everything (125shot) except a rotating assembly and was in the 11s.
Why is that just because you've "only seen one in person" that this makes it a rare event? I can point you to at least two (2) bolt-on mods only 96-98 Cobras running 11.6's. I know both of the guys personally, and have seen them run at the track.

Its funny sitting here writing this because this argument could on and on for days. I keep thinking of comebacks for my own arguments and so on.
No doubt about that. When you reply to something, this outcome is one possibility.

These arguments on the board just tire me out. I'm just going to walk away from this.
You'll pardon me if I make the rash assumption that you have no answer to the questions I asked. Obviously this is your choice, and that's ok with me.

You can have the victory Bob.
Well thank you, but "victory" was not my goal.

I sat there watching my movie thinking of many different comebacks. Some were pretty good, but I don’t see a point. You win, whatever
Good comebacks? Meaningful data, or slams? Engineering stuff, perhaps?

I'm going to sleep and dream about how fast ‘96 SS are.
An occasional fantasy is good....pleasant dreams.

(psst...that was a joke)

Originally posted by 30thZ286speed
Thanks alot Ford guys.
Neat. Blind stereotyping. Kindly see my post from yesterday about the demographics of this site - I'm curious why you don't fit the age group, yet your comment is a wonderful verification of my assumptions. Interesting.

Originally posted by jg95z28
Of course I was talking about real-life street cars and not a drag only application.
I was not referring to "drag only" either. Please do not try and pretend I did. I was referring to maximum acceleration - assuming traction is not an issue, the physics of such remain the same on the street or the track.

In plain english
Thank God for plain english.

no one is going to be constantly driving at 4800 rpm on the street.
In just as plain english, who said they were? Then again, if you're trying to accelerate as fast as possible, are you going to stay between 2000 and 4000 rpm? Not even your LT1 is going to do that, and certianly no LS1 or 4.6 DOHC will. No, they are going to to do there best to optimize their HP through the RPM range in each gear.

Most street V8's are running between 2000-4000 rpm tops.
Driving around town? Sure. Under hard accleration? Not. And lets be clear....were we talking about normal driving of the car, or were we talking about accelerating as fast as possible?

For a drag racing application 4800 rpm wouldn't be a handicap, and in that circumstance Bob is correct.
Please see above comments.

However no where was it ever implied that we were talking about drag only applications, and in fact everyone was bragging about street car performance.
I agree - but we weren't talking about goofing off on the street - for the 3rd (or 4th) time, we were talking about maximum acceleration from these street cars - be it on the street or on the track. They will accelerate hardest at the higher rpm.

Its easy to sound like a damn genius half the time if you slant everyone else's opinions to feed your own one-sided arguments.
Indeed. Perhaps you should grab that mirror.

But then I really could care less what some narrow-minded Ford guys think.
Could you please define who the "narrow-minded Ford guys" are? Kindly state your reasoning and evidence, too. And if you could "care less", why do you continue to reply?

Come to think of it, why is it Ford guys are always on GM sites yet you don't see as many Chevy guys on Ford sites? Hmmmmm.
Without realizing it, you just contridicted your previous statement. Let me know if you'd like for me to tell you how.

And BTW, not only am I an "enthusiast" vice any single-brand car guy, I've also been around here quite a bit longer than the majority of the people in this thread - including the time I owned my 99 T/A. Draw whatever conclusions you wish to.....or not.

Originally posted by FlyBono24
The Super-Corvette will blow it away, and it will do it with a $100,000 LOWER price tag!!
Is this more inside data? Pacer, better listen to this guy. He's saying that the "Super-Corvette" will run 130 mph in the 1/4 mile (stock) and be priced about the same as the current Z06!

You heard it here first. Note this on your calender.

Mark....I agree totally with your comments. Kudos to you. One exception....I think the reference to the $60k Z06 was for future models, not the current version.

I'm off to the airport...ya'll have fun today.
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 08:24 AM
  #104  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Can we get a lock already?
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 09:02 AM
  #105  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by PacerX
***EDITED OUT THE FLAMES***

Not worth the time.
Did anyone ever see that Clint Eastwood movie..."UNFORGIVEN".

It's about a former gunfighter who is doing his best to avoid gunfights.....until the end when he literally runs amok in a gunfight kill-a-thon.

Good movie.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.