Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Detroit News: GM may drop GMC and Pontiac

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 10:57 PM
  #91  
69Camaro327's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
From: Southeastern PA
+1 on pretty much all of that.

Originally Posted by FUTURE_OF_GM
GM in GMC doesn't stand for General Motors FWIW.
From what I remember I think that GMC does indeed stand for General Motors Co., but that it was initially Grablowski or Grabowski Motors Co., something like that. When GM purchased the company from the guy that started it(last name was the Grab something), they changed it to the current meaning. Its been a while since I looked into it though, so I could be off here.
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 12:09 AM
  #92  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
They have actual numbers to use.

Look at Oldsmobile.

GM lost sales almost exactly equivilent to what Olds was selling before they shut them down the following year(s).
But they'd been losing market share before shutting down Olds. I don't think you can say that the difference in sales between 2000 and 2005 is due to shutting down Olds, or that 2005 would have been the same as 2000 if they hadn't shut Olds.
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #93  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
Originally Posted by teal98
But they'd been losing market share before shutting down Olds. I don't think you can say that the difference in sales between 2000 and 2005 is due to shutting down Olds, or that 2005 would have been the same as 2000 if they hadn't shut Olds.
At the very least that indicates that no benefit was realized by killing Olds.

They are about to get the same result again.

Only this time the slide won't be stoppable.
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 08:37 AM
  #94  
routesixtysixer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 669
From: Arcadia, OK
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/23/r...ontiac-monday/

REPORT: General Motors to kill Pontiac on Monday

According to a report from InsideLine, General Motors could axe Pontiac as early as this Monday. Although IL isn't citing its source within GM, it did contact the General's PR man, Tom Wilkinson, who said, "There's nothing I can share with you at this time... Officially, nothing has changed with Pontiac's niche-brand status, until you hear differently." Not very clear, but not particularly positive either.

The line about Pontiac's "niche-brand status" has been floating around since last December, when GM began to focus on its four core brands – Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC – while readying the rest (Saab, Saturn and Hummer) for execution or extradition.

Pontiac's focus has been ill-defined (at best) over the decade, with solid products like the G8 coming to market alongside other less-than-stellar offerings (cough, G3). There was talk of reigniting Pontiac's performance heritage or even refocusing the brand as a Scion competitor. Regardless of past plans or intentions, there was no doubt that Pontiac was in the cross-hairs, and come Monday, we might know it's final fate.

[Source: InsideLine]
So, I wonder if I'll get a parting gift like I did when they killed Oldsmobile?
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #95  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by 69Camaro327
+1 on pretty much all of that.



From what I remember I think that GMC does indeed stand for General Motors Co., but that it was initially Grablowski or Grabowski Motors Co., something like that. When GM purchased the company from the guy that started it(last name was the Grab something), they changed it to the current meaning. Its been a while since I looked into it though, so I could be off here.
Actually the company Grablowski established was the Rapid Motor Vehicle Company. It was bought by GM in 1909. Another company called Reliance Motor Car Company had been acquired in 1908 and was merged with Rapid. The GMC logo was created for General Motors Truck Company which sold Rapid and Reliance trucks under that brand, and by 1913 they were all transitioned to the GMC Truck brand.

Old Apr 24, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #96  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by formula79
I know...Saturn sure would have been perfect for that task of marketing small, sporty, european cars.

Oh wait...


Taking what failed in Saturn dealerships and calling them Buicks does not seem sound.
Opels in Buick dealerships won't raise the average transaction price of a Buick by 30%.

When the Astra replaced the Ion, Saturn immediately lost many of the buyers that had built the brand. The Astra is a much better car, but it's also much more expensive.

People won't balk at a $24,000 entry level Buick - especially with LaCrosse bumping up-market.
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #97  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
At the very least that indicates that no benefit was realized by killing Olds.

They are about to get the same result again.

Only this time the slide won't be stoppable.
Killing Olds saved billions in model development costs. Sure most of that money was wasted on Hummer, Saturn, and so on. But GM also needed every penny they could scrounge up for Sigma, GMT-900, 2008 Malibu, Lambda and the other key products the company is now riding on.

Spending $3-5 Billion to keep 100,000 loyal customers happy does not make sense anyway you cut it.

Furthermore, at some point GM has to stop trying to defend marketshare that they lost ten years ago, and start thinking about how to grow new marketshare. The vast majority of those bought Oldsmobiles and Pontiacs in the good old days are long gone now.

....
Originally Posted by FUTURE_OF_GM
GM in GMC doesn't stand for General Motors FWIW.
It really doesn't matter if it stands for "Grabowski" or nothing at all, because everyone thinks it stands for "General Motors". If the General Motors Corporation goes titsup, the GMC nameplate cannot survive.

Chevy is not going to be able to handle all of this product... It's going to be a logisitcal/dealer training nightmare.

Chevy is now supposed to take up small cars from Saturn, niche performance cars from Pontiac and luxury trucks from GMC?!?!? In addition to one of the industries BIGGEST line ups as it is?
Would it really be any worse than a Toyota/Scion dealership? They have everything from the xA to Sequoia.

And Chevy already sells small cars, performance cars, and luxury trucks. I think they just need to shift some branding around, not radically change their product line.

Last edited by flowmotion; Apr 24, 2009 at 02:49 PM.
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #98  
routesixtysixer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 669
From: Arcadia, OK
Furthermore, at some point GM has to stop trying to defend marketshare that they lost ten years ago, and start thinking about how to grow new marketshare. The vast majority of those bought Oldsmobiles and Pontiacs in the good old days are long gone now.
Hey, I resemble that remark!
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 04:53 PM
  #99  
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Originally Posted by routesixtysixer
Hey, I resemble that remark!
I'd say you resemble a person more than a remark; however, you might resent that remark
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 05:12 PM
  #100  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
At the very least that indicates that no benefit was realized by killing Olds.
No, it doesn't. It really doesn't indicate anything except that sales continued to slide after Olds was killed, much as they had before Olds was killed.
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #101  
69Camaro327's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
From: Southeastern PA
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
Actually the company Grablowski established was the Rapid Motor Vehicle Compa...
Ah yeah thats right. I knew it was something along those lines but couldnt remember exactly.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #102  
ehaase's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 213
Because of CAFE, I have a hard time seeing GMC survive the decade. I think there is going to be a radical reduction in sales of pickups, SUV's, and crossovers, and our market will look more European by the end of the decade, with C class cars dominating sales. I'd like to see GM have Cadillac-Buick-GMC dealerships, especially if GMC eventually dies.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #103  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by ehaase
Because of CAFE, I have a hard time seeing GMC survive the decade. I think there is going to be a radical reduction in sales of pickups, SUV's, and crossovers, and our market will look more European by the end of the decade, with C class cars dominating sales. I'd like to see GM have Cadillac-Buick-GMC dealerships, especially if GMC eventually dies.
When the dust finally settles, I fully expect to see Buicks and Cadillacs sold in the same showrooms, with GMC.

Pontiac's death is going to leave a crater in the sales volume of BPG dealers. With SUVs & Crossovers still taking up at least half of all new vehicle sales, I don't see GMC going anywhere.

Buick has no ability to stand alone. Outside of the Enclave, nothing is a substantial seller. The new Lacrosse will likely sell as good as the Lucerne did (as well as taking it's place on the market), and the new Lucerne is likely to wind up being a Holden. The Regal I suspect will pull the volume the Saturn Aura did (not bad, but not G6 volume, either). Put Cadillac in the same showroom as the step up from Buick, and it makes sense. Both brands complement each other in a way Pontiac and Buick never did.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #104  
routesixtysixer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 669
From: Arcadia, OK
Originally Posted by My Red 93Z-28
I'd say you resemble a person more than a remark; however, you might resent that remark
Sorry, that was a rather obscure reference on my part...
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #105  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by routesixtysixer
Hey, I resemble that remark!
Originally Posted by My Red 93Z-28
I'd say you resemble a person more than a remark; however, you might resent that remark
Originally Posted by routesixtysixer
Sorry, that was a rather obscure reference on my part...
Didn't anyone used to watch the Three Stooges?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.