Colorado SS pics....
Re: Colorado SS pics....
Originally Posted by muckz
According to the US site, the weight is 3550 lbs approx. Canadian site says 3650, so I dont' know which way to take it.
How much is the last generation Lightning?
How much is the last generation Lightning?
Evil turbo SS kind of brought this up, but whatever happened to the turbocharged I-5? Would anyone prefer seeing that in place of an LsX v8?
Re: Colorado SS pics....
http://www.chevrolet.com/colorado/specifications/
Extended Cab ZQ8 is 3526lbs., LS2 is a pretty light V8, 100-150lbs. extra maybe?
Turbo I5 should be used in a new GMC Syclone
A lower boost turbo I5 would make a good H3 Alpha engine.
Colorado SS = 400HP LS2
GMC Syclone = 330HP Turbo I5
H3 Alpha = 290HP Turbo I5 (also make this avalible as an option in the Z71 Colorado
)
Extended Cab ZQ8 is 3526lbs., LS2 is a pretty light V8, 100-150lbs. extra maybe?
Turbo I5 should be used in a new GMC Syclone
A lower boost turbo I5 would make a good H3 Alpha engine.Colorado SS = 400HP LS2
GMC Syclone = 330HP Turbo I5
H3 Alpha = 290HP Turbo I5 (also make this avalible as an option in the Z71 Colorado
)
Re: Colorado SS pics....
Originally Posted by Z28x
http://www.chevrolet.com/colorado/specifications/
Extended Cab ZQ8 is 3526lbs., LS2 is a pretty light V8, 100-150lbs. extra maybe?
Extended Cab ZQ8 is 3526lbs., LS2 is a pretty light V8, 100-150lbs. extra maybe?
Originally Posted by Z28x
Turbo I5 should be used in a new GMC Syclone
A lower boost turbo I5 would make a good H3 Alpha engine.
Colorado SS = 400HP LS2
GMC Syclone = 330HP Turbo I5
H3 Alpha = 290HP Turbo I5 (also make this avalible as an option in the Z71 Colorado
)
A lower boost turbo I5 would make a good H3 Alpha engine.Colorado SS = 400HP LS2
GMC Syclone = 330HP Turbo I5
H3 Alpha = 290HP Turbo I5 (also make this avalible as an option in the Z71 Colorado
)
Re: Colorado SS pics....
Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
Id love to get one of those with 4 seats and 4x4 ....
Why dont they ever make performace trucks that are livable all year yound and practical at the same time?
Why dont they ever make performace trucks that are livable all year yound and practical at the same time?
Last edited by Z28x; Nov 16, 2004 at 01:02 PM.
Re: Colorado SS pics....
Originally Posted by Z28x
They did that with the Silverado SS and people cried about it. I'd like to see the SS package applied to all 3 cab configs on the Colorado. There should also be some sort of hi-performance Z71 with something like a low boost turbo or s/c I5.
It would be kinda cool to get a preformance 4x4 like a Silverado SS Z71 crew cab with 5.3 v8 making 300 hp. Thing is it wouldn't tread on the ZQ8 or a Z85 Colorado cause with all the weight a z71 package puts it would be slower.
Also it would be neat for GM to make a SS silverado with the 2wd and Z71 model's with a 395 LS2 with 6 speed. You could put this powertrain on the Z71 Silverado or you can pick the preformance oriented Silverado with suspension, lowered ride height, ect ect.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 17, 2015 02:47 PM
Joe K. 96 Zeee!!
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
6
Oct 28, 2003 11:50 AM
Burmite
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
12
Aug 29, 2003 09:15 AM
Mervz
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
18
Aug 20, 2003 01:12 PM



