http://forums.autoweek.com/servlet/J...ft10_black.jpg

Ok, it's a PS...but I thought it looked cool.

 

Whats the original photo look like? Cause to me that SCREAMS, Charger!

 

looks badazz...wouldn't buy a chrysler, but it looks kewl.

 

I really don't know why, but for some reason I really don't like photoshops.

Probally the result from all these years of seeing everything except F150s converted into someone's "Concept Camaro" or everyone but my sister's cat coming up with some version of what something "should have" been.

Or perhaps I prefer and appriciate the skills of guys who actually put pencil to paper.

To me Photoshop is like looking at someone's computer manufactured Calligraphy writing, and comparing it with people who have spent effort and time to learn to do it themselves.

Just an personal opinion, that's all.

 

As one who believes that the 1969 Charger is the best looking muscle car of all time, that is one Chrysler that I would actually pay to have in my own driveway.

 

That Is Exactly What A Charger Should Look Like!

 

100% better IMO.

 

I think that looks great. Although only one problem...those flip headlights in the front grill...wonder if there is some way they could save that old charger grill look and have non-flip lights.

 

and they called the Mustang retro...

 

and you called CHris H's car retro...this thing is the same thing...front end and rear of the old charger..same thing Chris H's car was front and back of a Camaro..

 

Or Chris Pauwels, which Horton did his rendering from.

 

Pretty sure Kris H's first rendering was not based on crispey's drawing...

 

ARGGGGGGG!!! Retro!!! If you want retro BUY THE REAL THING!!

 

Holy Hannah does that ever look a lot better!

 

WTF..its a 69 Charger front and back...if i was a Camaro it would be WORNG! right??