Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Old Jan 1, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #1  
FS3800's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Ok.. now, when i saw this link:
http://www.allpar.com/forums/index.p...pe=post&id=516

i was shocked.. that link states that the Challenger concept while using a shorted LX platform of 116" wheelbase, is actually a whole inch longer than a 300, and 1/10 an inch longer than a Magnum, a WAGON!..

Challenger: 197.8"
Magnum: 197.7"
300: 196.8"

basically the same size as a Magnum:


now.. that pic doesnt do it justice.. no point of reference.. sure it's as big as a magnum, which we all know is a very big car.. how big is it compared to other modern "muscle" cars...



yes, it's true.. i looked up their lengths, and used their ratio vs the Challenger 's length and did the same ratio of lenght in pixels

not only is the challenger longer, but in order to keep it looking proportional, the whole thing is huge, it's tall!.. look how heigh that "waist" is..

it'd be no surprise to me if the rumors were true and this thing weighed in at over 4000lbs
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #2  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

It's a big car no dbout. That is awesome work FS. Like I have said in previous posts, this car to me is the modern day GTX/Coronet RT/Charger RT, it just happens to look like a 1970 challenger. For my needs, that works just fine, the new Camaro will fill my needs for a pony car.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #3  
FS3800's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

yeah, i know when i see the 05+ mustangs, i used to think they looked big.. bloated ... but compared to this thing.... they are nothing
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #4  
Joe 1320's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 422
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

The trend that I am liking is the once again ability to see the hood from the driver's seat.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 01:50 PM
  #5  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Originally Posted by FS3800
basically the same size as a Magnum:


now.. that pic doesnt do it justice.. no point of reference.. sure it's as big as a magnum, which we all know is a very big car.. how big is it compared to other modern "muscle" cars...
Great Job FS3800. Can you overlay a 4th gen on top of the Challenger to give a better idea of just how tall that thing is? I looks like the top of the 4th gen would be about 1/2 up the Challenger's cabin. Talk about command seating!
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #6  
FS3800's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Originally Posted by danno02SS
Great Job FS3800. Can you overlay a 4th gen on top of the Challenger to give a better idea of just how tall that thing is? I looks like the top of the 4th gen would be about 1/2 up the Challenger's cabin. Talk about command seating!
kind of a crappy, quick, hack job.. but i think you get the idea

it's greenhouse is a few inches bigger all around.. the height is really hard to get right because the way i had it set up i'm not sure where the bottom of the tires actually are..

Old Jan 1, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #7  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Originally Posted by FS3800
kind of a crappy, quick, hack job.. but i think you get the idea

it's greenhouse is a few inches bigger all around.. the height is really hard to get right because the way i had it set up i'm not sure where the bottom of the tires actually are..

What looks cool is the Camaro with a 116" wheelbase and 20/21" wheels.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #8  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

That was real nice of you to take the time and adjust the pictures like that. Thank you very much for the size comparison.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #9  
FS3800's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Originally Posted by number77
That was real nice of you to take the time and adjust the pictures like that. Thank you very much for the size comparison.
eh.. i was bored
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 03:26 PM
  #10  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Wow! Good work!!!

What a tank!
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #11  
johnsocal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,911
From: Southern California (SoCal)
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Does this mean the challenger will have 'real' back seats suitable for adults?
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #12  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Since I like to autox, this car will totally suck for that because of its weight and size. I hope the new Camaro doesnt even come close to those dimensions.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #13  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Originally Posted by FS3800
kind of a crappy, quick, hack job.. but i think you get the idea

it's greenhouse is a few inches bigger all around.. the height is really hard to get right because the way i had it set up i'm not sure where the bottom of the tires actually are..

Thanks, FS3800. Wow those 20"+ wheels are really misleading. I can definitely see it weighing in at 4100lbs.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #14  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

Originally Posted by johnsocal
Does this mean the challenger will have 'real' back seats suitable for adults?
Yes. Or, at least, Chrysler apparently plans to make that claim, and that's one of the ways they plan to differentiate it from Mustang. "A ponycar with seating for five adults," and all that.

Chrysler's thing these days is to do "alternatives" rather than head-on competitors for new market entries.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 11:33 PM
  #15  
OctaneZ28's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 873
From: Chicagoland, IL www.5thGen.org
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison

WOW! Holy monstrosity, Batman!

Great job on the images Tom!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.