Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
well......as was mentioned in this thread earlier.....it IS based off an existing platform.
Yup ...it will weigh a lot.......and people.....get used to it......in order to get a 5-star side impact rating, it's gonna cost you in terms of weight. No one paid any attention to something like that yesteryear.
(well......you COULD use exotic materials....but that adds to cost......and you'll still have a weight problem......)
GREAT JOB, FS!!!
Yup ...it will weigh a lot.......and people.....get used to it......in order to get a 5-star side impact rating, it's gonna cost you in terms of weight. No one paid any attention to something like that yesteryear.
(well......you COULD use exotic materials....but that adds to cost......and you'll still have a weight problem......)
GREAT JOB, FS!!!
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Could you make a comparison to the original Challenger from 1970? If you guys remember, the muscle cars of the late 60's weren't exactly small either, 1970 Chevelle/GTO/GS/Cutlass anyone?
The Challenger might be the same over-all length as the Magnum, but the wheel-base is 4" shorter.
The Challenger might be the same over-all length as the Magnum, but the wheel-base is 4" shorter.
Last edited by Camarocracy; Jan 2, 2006 at 02:55 AM.
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by Camarocracy
Could you make a comparison to the original Challenger from 1970? If you guys remember, the muscle cars of the late 60's weren't exactly small either, 1970 Chevelle/GTO/GS/Cutlass anyone?

1970 challenger:
wheelbase: 110"
length: 191.3"
new challenger:
wheelbase: 116"
length: 197.8"
1970 chevelle:
wheelbase: 112"
length: 197.2"
Originally Posted by Camarocracy
The Challenger might be the same over-all length as the Magnum, but the wheel-base is 4" shorter.
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
Yup ...it will weigh a lot.......and people.....get used to it......in order to get a 5-star side impact rating, it's gonna cost you in terms of weight. No one paid any attention to something like that yesteryear.
(well......you COULD use exotic materials....but that adds to cost......and you'll still have a weight problem......)
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by SNEAKY NEIL
I don't like the sound of that..................it sounds like a warning or getting us prepared for what is to come with a certain vehicle.
I know what you mean, I thought the same thing.
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by Z28x
Why is the hood so long on the Challenger? (compared to platform mate Magnum) Are they keeping room for a V12 or something?
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by FS3800
i'd say to keep those classic muscle car proportions.. long hood, short deck..
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
I don't give a damn how heavy or how big the new Challenger, Camaro or GT500 are. All that matters to me is they're fast, and if they can outrun the models they replace that's ****ing awesome.
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by yellow_99_gt
I don't give a damn how heavy or how big the new Challenger, Camaro or GT500 are. All that matters to me is they're fast, and if they can outrun the models they replace that's ****ing awesome.
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by yellow_99_gt
I don't give a damn how heavy or how big the new Challenger, Camaro or GT500 are. All that matters to me is they're fast, and if they can outrun the models they replace that's ****ing awesome.
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I hope that you're kidding or just being sarcastic. Because if you're not, I'd have to call this the most ridiculous post I've read in a long time.
Re: Challenger Concept Size Comparison
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
well......as was mentioned in this thread earlier.....it IS based off an existing platform.
Yup ...it will weigh a lot.......and people.....get used to it......in order to get a 5-star side impact rating, it's gonna cost you in terms of weight. No one paid any attention to something like that yesteryear.
(well......you COULD use exotic materials....but that adds to cost......and you'll still have a weight problem......)
GREAT JOB, FS!!!
Yup ...it will weigh a lot.......and people.....get used to it......in order to get a 5-star side impact rating, it's gonna cost you in terms of weight. No one paid any attention to something like that yesteryear.
(well......you COULD use exotic materials....but that adds to cost......and you'll still have a weight problem......)
GREAT JOB, FS!!!
For those who intend to sell their vehicles in Europe, the new EU pedestrian standards surely didn't make it any easier. On the otherhand the new EU pedestrian safety standard might be a key factor in why the oldschool blunt-nose-look (in which I like alot) is being brought back


