Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Alpha: All things to all enthusiasts.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #16  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by super83Z
Is there a performance oriented 4-cylinder in development? To complement the Alpha chasis?
I think that you can count on that.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 12:46 AM
  #17  
IREngineer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 854
From: neverneverland
How's about they make Alpha I4 and V6 only and then have Camaro carry the costs of a new extended front section that accomodates a V8. This would give a car that has the same wheelbase as a 3 coupe but the long hood, badass look of a pony car. Just thinking off the top of my head, this would put Camaro right smack dab on top of NG Mustang in size and weight.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 06:02 AM
  #18  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Well all know what happens though when you extend dash/axle ratio...weight.
3 series coupe carries a long nose/short deck look and fits a massive DOHC V8 between its fenders.
Id also love to hear about the dimentions on the Gen V SBC.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 06:51 AM
  #19  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Don't forget that the 5G exceeds Federal crash standards. While other (newer) cars are expected to gain weight to meet crash standards, the Zeta Camaro would be expected to stay relatively static in weight for a while yet given it's already safer than other cars in its class.

EDIT: The other thing to note is the battery location of the Zeta Camaro... given Camaro is considered a large car, it's ironic that there is no room for the battery under the hood. So, how much better will Alpha be insofar as packaging in this regard?

Last edited by SSbaby; Apr 22, 2010 at 06:55 AM.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:27 AM
  #20  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by SSbaby
I think that point is flawed. You can't assume that Alpha will be considerably lighter than Zeta.
Again, if Alpha isn't "tidier" than Zeta, what then would be the point of it? I know it will be smaller, but the goal will be much lighter as well. And this time, they have a clean sheet to work with to accomplish that.

In other words, GM's Alpha will be lighter than GM's future Zeta (or Beta) platforms. So it's really a no brainer as to which direction GM will take for Camaro.
Not sure I understand, you seem to have gone two different directions in one post. I agree with what you're saying here.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 07:31 AM
  #21  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Don't forget that the 5G exceeds Federal crash standards. While other (newer) cars are expected to gain weight to meet crash standards, the Zeta Camaro would be expected to stay relatively static in weight for a while yet given it's already safer than other cars in its class.
Well, Camaro did "only" get 4/5 stars in the government's front impact crash test, I remember it taking a bit of ribbing for that considering how extra weight was supposed to mean "extra safety" according to some circles...

EDIT: The other thing to note is the battery location of the Zeta Camaro... given Camaro is considered a large car, it's ironic that there is no room for the battery under the hood. So, how much better will Alpha be insofar as packaging in this regard?
Not sure if it was "no room" or if it was relocated for better weight distribution. Racers do this all the time.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #22  
94YellowTAGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 289
From: Springfield, MO, USA
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Well, Camaro did "only" get 4/5 stars in the government's front impact crash test, I remember it taking a bit of ribbing for that considering how extra weight was supposed to mean "extra safety" according to some circles...



Not sure if it was "no room" or if it was relocated for better weight distribution. Racers do this all the time.
I think Onstar has something to due with the battery location.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #23  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
GM just needs to focus on the simple marketplace targets for the Alpha. There is no way it can be all things for all of GM's RWD needs. Really Alpha should be a Caddy first and adapted for the Camaro. If Alpha's target is the BMW 3-series, Lexus IS and MB C-Class then there are a lot of similar needs that can trasfer to a Camaro. I'd limit engine choices to just V6 and V8. V6 for base Camaro and ATS and V8 for SS or Z/28 and V-series. Limit trans choices to one manual and one auto. The 8 speed auto is a great idea but limited in scope for RWD.
Why wouldn't you want GM to have 8 speeds autos in RWD cars? All the competition will have them. Better performance and fuel economy.

4cl. or Turbo 4cyl. will probably be in the mix. This is 2014/15 we are talking about. V6 Camaro already puts out 312HP. Should be 330HP-350HP by 2015. 4cyls. will be used for cars in the 200-300HP range.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 09:37 AM
  #24  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by IREngineer
How's about they make Alpha I4 and V6 only and then have Camaro carry the costs of a new extended front section that accomodates a V8. This would give a car that has the same wheelbase as a 3 coupe but the long hood, badass look of a pony car. Just thinking off the top of my head, this would put Camaro right smack dab on top of NG Mustang in size and weight.
Yeah, I certainly hope that Camaro can get it's own proportions. But it looks like the ATS-V will also have itself a hot smallblock.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 11:15 AM
  #25  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Don't forget that the 5G exceeds Federal crash standards. While other (newer) cars are expected to gain weight to meet crash standards, the Zeta Camaro would be expected to stay relatively static in weight for a while yet given it's already safer than other cars in its class.
Mustang got an overall 5 star rating. I'm pretty sure its in the same class as Camaro, don't you think?

EDIT: The other thing to note is the battery location of the Zeta Camaro... given Camaro is considered a large car, it's ironic that there is no room for the battery under the hood. So, how much better will Alpha be insofar as packaging in this regard?
Is there no room for the battery, or is it elsewhere to enhance better F/R weight balance?
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #26  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Originally Posted by IREngineer
How's about they make Alpha I4 and V6 only and then have Camaro carry the costs of a new extended front section that accomodates a V8. This would give a car that has the same wheelbase as a 3 coupe but the long hood, badass look of a pony car. Just thinking off the top of my head, this would put Camaro right smack dab on top of NG Mustang in size and weight.
This is what I was getting at. I don't think making it able to accept a V8 automatically means that the platform will be over weight.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #27  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Z28x
Why wouldn't you want GM to have 8 speeds autos in RWD cars? All the competition will have them. Better performance and fuel economy.

4cl. or Turbo 4cyl. will probably be in the mix. This is 2014/15 we are talking about. V6 Camaro already puts out 312HP. Should be 330HP-350HP by 2015. 4cyls. will be used for cars in the 200-300HP range.
Something about a 350hp-V6 8 speed auto driven RWD coupe appeals to me... assuming it weighs less than 3500 lbs.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 12:45 PM
  #28  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by Z28x

4cl. or Turbo 4cyl. will probably be in the mix. This is 2014/15 we are talking about. V6 Camaro already puts out 312HP. Should be 330HP-350HP by 2015. 4cyls. will be used for cars in the 200-300HP range.
I often wonder if the trend will continue. Do you think in 1969 they were talking about how much more powerful the cars were going to be in 74-75?
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #29  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Has GM been working on making a dual clutch gearbox? if so, would this be offered on the alpha? I'd rather see that than an 7 or 8 speed auto.
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 04:41 PM
  #30  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Again, if Alpha isn't "tidier" than Zeta, what then would be the point of it? I know it will be smaller, but the goal will be much lighter as well. And this time, they have a clean sheet to work with to accomplish that.
The ATS has a clean sheet. The Camaro, if rumors turn to be correct, will be the third car off of the chassis after ATS and CTS.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.