Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2008 Honda Accord

Old May 14, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #31  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Boring car for boring people.
Old May 15, 2007 | 07:22 AM
  #32  
Todd80Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 439
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Boring car for boring people.
LMAO.

'96 Ford Explorer, 198k and counting...
Old May 15, 2007 | 07:46 AM
  #33  
FS3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by 3SuperSports
I'm not and never will be blindly loyal to any brand.
thats perfectly fine and a good outlook to have.. but on the flip side, you should also not discount a brand simply because of bad experiences with vehicles in the past
Old May 15, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #34  
cmutt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 121
Originally Posted by dav305z
I wonder what it has for power. I'll be looking forward to test driving it. The one Accord I drove was a fantastic ride - communicative, light on it's feet, responsive (even in the 4-cylinder version I tested).

I feel about the Accord the same way I do about Derek Jeter. Sure he plays for the other team - a team I despise - but he's a great player who makes great plays when it counts.

The media likes to say the Camry sets the bar in the mid-size class, but it's a lunchbox on wheels. Accord is the car that established handling as a necessary quality for mid-size sedans. Having said all that, I think it's safe to say the next Accord will be a serious competitor, even if it doesn't look better sans camouflage.
You nailed it Dav - couldn't agree with you more on this one.
Old May 15, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #35  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by Threxx
My Audi has actually been near flawless since I started my lease on it almost 2 years ago. That hasn't actually managed to convince me that the horrible reliability ratings JD Power gives to the brand aren't true - I just think I got lucky. Either that or it's a time bomb waiting to happen - good thing it will be going back to the dealer long before the warranty is out.
Just to comment on Audis...

Mine has been very good to me, it is 6 years old now with 100K miles. Heard that 4.2 engines break transmissions/torque converters around 60-80K, however, mine is holding up fine so far (doesn't mean it won't fail tomorrow). It is very reliable - always starts, always smooth, predictable accelerator response, and.... and.... NO RATTLES!

When I bought it, I expected problems to surface here and there, but am rather pleasantly surprised it's holding up this well.
Old May 15, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #36  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
If I was in the market for a family mid-sizer, the (2007) Accord would be up there. I wouldn't give the current Camry a second look.

I wish the new '08 Malibu had a better-looking rear. Then we'd really be cooking with gas.
Old May 15, 2007 | 06:25 PM
  #37  
3SuperSports's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by FS3800
thats perfectly fine and a good outlook to have.. but on the flip side, you should also not discount a brand simply because of bad experiences with vehicles in the past

I know what you're trying to say, but it's hard to give money to somebody after they've totally bent you over. The saying "Screw me once, shame on you. Screw me twice, shame on me" keeps ringing in my head.
It actually makes it easier that I'm not a fan of the concept Camaro, cause if I liked it, I'd be trying to convince myself that the last beating I took, really wans't that bad.
Old May 16, 2007 | 02:34 AM
  #38  
dav305z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 757
Originally Posted by 3SuperSports
I know what you're trying to say, but it's hard to give money to somebody after they've totally bent you over. The saying "Screw me once, shame on you. Screw me twice, shame on me" keeps ringing in my head.
It actually makes it easier that I'm not a fan of the concept Camaro, cause if I liked it, I'd be trying to convince myself that the last beating I took, really wans't that bad.
Not to get too far off topic, but this is the main challenge GM and its American counterparts face. They created with their subpar products millions of individual bad experiences. If I buy spoiled meat from someone, I don't go back there. That's about $10. Why would anyone risk $25,000 on a company that screwed them over once?

It seems to me the only way the Domestics can hope to achieve "conquest" sales is by building dream machines - 300C's, Mustangs, Camaro's. These cars have enough emotional appeal to overcome the logical argument many people have for avoiding American cars. This is why projects like Zeta are critical, even if on paper they don't produce enough volume.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Formula Steve
LT1 Based Engine Tech
45
Sep 19, 2023 08:31 AM
Novo
Forced Induction
45
Jun 14, 2016 02:58 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 30, 2015 04:20 PM
z28newbie
Site Help and Suggestions
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:26 AM
z28newbie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:26 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.