2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Its an old wives tale that an IROC is a better handler than a 4th gen. The cars have the exact same rear suspension, but the 4th gen suspenion is a superior design (if the strut worked so well, why'd they go away from it?) AND more meat in the form of 275/40-17 tires in later years.
A 1LE IROC was a pretty tough machine on the SCCA showroom stock circuit...dominated its class in its day, but an SS or Firehawk with the Bilstein suspension is a superior handling car hands down.
I love third gens, owned two of them, but I get tired of the way 3rd gen owners deify the cars like that is the best generation made. Looks and styling are subjective...I know some folks like 1st gens better, others 2nds, some 3rd and some 4ths, but lets not dillute objective measurements and deny the notion of progress through updates and advancements.
A 1LE IROC was a pretty tough machine on the SCCA showroom stock circuit...dominated its class in its day, but an SS or Firehawk with the Bilstein suspension is a superior handling car hands down.
I love third gens, owned two of them, but I get tired of the way 3rd gen owners deify the cars like that is the best generation made. Looks and styling are subjective...I know some folks like 1st gens better, others 2nds, some 3rd and some 4ths, but lets not dillute objective measurements and deny the notion of progress through updates and advancements.
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Believe me, I gave GM a chance!
I was simply looking for a 5 passenger, fun to drive, daily driver....with a manual trans, in a liveable package. The closest thing GM had to offer me at the time was the GTP. No manual trans though, and it handled like a pig.
I was on the verge of buying an Audi A4 Sport...when I passed by an SVT dealer...and on a lark...test drove an SVT Contour. Whithin 40 seconds of that test drive, I knew I would buy it! I actually preferred the SVT Contour's driving experience to the A4's (the A4's motors felt like boat anchors to me)....and saving 4 or 5 grand wasn't bad either.
Since this was the first Ford I've ever purchased, it took alittle adjusting for me....but you know what?...when you're on your back detailing it's undercarriage....it's no longer just a Ford, it's MY CAR.
Sooo, what's the moral of the story? To GM....if you build a Chevy pony car...and call it Chevelle, Excalibur or anything else other than C*A*M*A*R*O....you'll lose yet one more sale.
I was simply looking for a 5 passenger, fun to drive, daily driver....with a manual trans, in a liveable package. The closest thing GM had to offer me at the time was the GTP. No manual trans though, and it handled like a pig.
I was on the verge of buying an Audi A4 Sport...when I passed by an SVT dealer...and on a lark...test drove an SVT Contour. Whithin 40 seconds of that test drive, I knew I would buy it! I actually preferred the SVT Contour's driving experience to the A4's (the A4's motors felt like boat anchors to me)....and saving 4 or 5 grand wasn't bad either.
Since this was the first Ford I've ever purchased, it took alittle adjusting for me....but you know what?...when you're on your back detailing it's undercarriage....it's no longer just a Ford, it's MY CAR.
Sooo, what's the moral of the story? To GM....if you build a Chevy pony car...and call it Chevelle, Excalibur or anything else other than C*A*M*A*R*O....you'll lose yet one more sale.
I present to you all, exhibit 'A'.
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
Its an old wives tale that an IROC is a better handler than a 4th gen. The cars have the exact same rear suspension, but the 4th gen suspenion is a superior design (if the strut worked so well, why'd they go away from it?) AND more meat in the form of 275/40-17 tires in later years.
A 1LE IROC was a pretty tough machine on the SCCA showroom stock circuit...dominated its class in its day, but an SS or Firehawk with the Bilstein suspension is a superior handling car hands down.
A 1LE IROC was a pretty tough machine on the SCCA showroom stock circuit...dominated its class in its day, but an SS or Firehawk with the Bilstein suspension is a superior handling car hands down.
Last edited by IZ28; Jul 23, 2004 at 08:54 PM.
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Originally Posted by dream '94 Z28
This is my arguement against blind brand loyallty!
I present to you all, exhibit 'A'.
I present to you all, exhibit 'A'.

until now, I bought 2 cars now from the dealer, and ALWAYS went to chevy's first.. but first time ended with a Jetta 94 over the z24 and second a ford Ka instead the corsa.. why??? very bad salesman and high prices...
but hey, I still have 1 of the 3 thirdgen camaros I owned

ok.. totally out of subject
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Lets all hope a 2005 GT Mustang handles better than a 2002 Z28. For crying out loud the 02' Z28 chassis is basically the same design from 1993
If Ford cant best a 12 year old suspension design with the release of their COMPLETELY NEW Mustang, then they should be ashamed. And from the info I have read, they might inch the OLD Z28 out, but the will in no way BEST it! What a dissapointment, seriously. If I was a Mustang guy I would be pissed. I mean you are FINALLY getting decent power in the GT and good power in the Cobra, now wheres the handling? I think Ford could persuade a lot of other drivers to come over to the dark side if they could improve the handling. However this was my sentiment with the 98-04 style body and a hope for some nice sleek changes in 05'. Kind of like the C5 makeover to the C6. That with some handling and I might have considered one in a year or two when I am ready to buy. Unfortunatley it will have to be atleast another generation of Mustangs before I even think of considering one, because the new car doesnt have impressive handling, only has decent power, and looks GOD AWEFUL
Man, with the cars available in todays market, an IRS, A-arm Mustang GT with 350hp and just a slight tweek on the current bodys styling would have looked awesome to me. Im sure it would to the Mustang crowd too! Unfortunately you have to deal with that ugly retro contraption, live axle, mcpherson struts, blah blah blah. It's kind of painful, I almost feel ashamed for almost considering a Mustang (diehard Chevy family), but theres nothing else out there! Oh well, dont have to anymore, Ford took care of that for me, THANK YOU FORD, wheeew (close one). I guess its GTO or Camaro if it ever comes back, maybe a used Vette, hmmmm....
If Ford cant best a 12 year old suspension design with the release of their COMPLETELY NEW Mustang, then they should be ashamed. And from the info I have read, they might inch the OLD Z28 out, but the will in no way BEST it! What a dissapointment, seriously. If I was a Mustang guy I would be pissed. I mean you are FINALLY getting decent power in the GT and good power in the Cobra, now wheres the handling? I think Ford could persuade a lot of other drivers to come over to the dark side if they could improve the handling. However this was my sentiment with the 98-04 style body and a hope for some nice sleek changes in 05'. Kind of like the C5 makeover to the C6. That with some handling and I might have considered one in a year or two when I am ready to buy. Unfortunatley it will have to be atleast another generation of Mustangs before I even think of considering one, because the new car doesnt have impressive handling, only has decent power, and looks GOD AWEFUL
Man, with the cars available in todays market, an IRS, A-arm Mustang GT with 350hp and just a slight tweek on the current bodys styling would have looked awesome to me. Im sure it would to the Mustang crowd too! Unfortunately you have to deal with that ugly retro contraption, live axle, mcpherson struts, blah blah blah. It's kind of painful, I almost feel ashamed for almost considering a Mustang (diehard Chevy family), but theres nothing else out there! Oh well, dont have to anymore, Ford took care of that for me, THANK YOU FORD, wheeew (close one). I guess its GTO or Camaro if it ever comes back, maybe a used Vette, hmmmm....
Last edited by ZZtop; Jul 25, 2004 at 02:27 AM.
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Originally Posted by IZ28
They do handle better. Why do you think one got consistently higher .g's?
I have owned both a 3rd Gen IROC and 2 4th Gens. That IROC sure did handle well on a glass-smooth surface, but the car shimmied and creaked and tossed you all around over the slightest of bumps. I'd gladly sacrifice .01 G for the added ride comfort. The 5th Gen cars would be wise to continue the balance between track grip and "butt" grip.
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
[QUOTE=Chris 96 WS6]Its an old wives tale that an IROC is a better handler than a 4th gen. The cars have the exact same rear suspension, but the 4th gen suspenion is a superior design (if the strut worked so well, why'd they go away from it?) AND more meat in the form of 275/40-17 tires in later years.
[QUOTE]
Yup.
What he said.
[QUOTE]
Yup.
What he said.
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Just interviewed Hau Thai-Tang the mustang's chief engineer. It looks like it will outhandle the F-bodies and the SN-95 stangs. They recently raced it against an M3 at (forgot the road course....long beach??) and the lap times differed by 0.5 seconds. And I think that was with 17" 235 tires.
Mr. Tang kept emphasizing how great the new setup really was. He almost went so far as to say that IRS wasn't needed on the Cobra.
Mr. Tang kept emphasizing how great the new setup really was. He almost went so far as to say that IRS wasn't needed on the Cobra.
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Skid pad testing from mags such as CAR and Drivel dont tell all that much. Different size skid pad testing tell different things. What car will go around the majority of tracks faster? Its not the third gen....
Re: 2005 Mustang GT to handle better than 2002 Z28?
Originally Posted by Evil Turbo SS
Skid pad testing from mags such as CAR and Drivel dont tell all that much. Different size skid pad testing tell different things. What car will go around the majority of tracks faster? Its not the third gen....
There was NO tire available in the 3rd's that would stick like the 275's on an SS.
None. Zip. Zero.
Tire technology has come a LOOOONG way in 10 years.
And I'll tell ya another thing...
Having driven both in the 4th gen, and all of the above over time, an SS rides much harder than a Z28, and either one will hand an IROC it's rear end.


