Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

'05 Mustang HP numbers are leaking out...

Old Sep 10, 2003 | 07:16 PM
  #16  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally posted by jsaylor
I have an idea that when the next Mustang shows up it is going to be lighter than anyone suspected.
I wouldn't put any money on that bet.
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 10:35 PM
  #17  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by ProudPony
I've heard nothing new on the V6 cars yet, so I'm assuming they are the same basic 200hp units we have out now - it is after all the base V6.
The new Duratec 3.5L Dohc won't come out till the 06 model year. The 3.8 will only be in the new Mustangs for 1 year, and Ford has already said the 3.5L Dohc will replace it in the Mustang. Rumors hint at 250hp (nothing official) for the base 3.5 Mustang, and the 3.5L is said to be capable of as much as 275hp which i'm sure is reserved for higher-end models within Ford motor Co.

SNEAKY NEIL, 275rwhp is not LT-1 #s. But i'm assuming you were reffering to the 255rwhp low-side figures. But i highly doubt that low 255rwhp figure. I personally think the GT will be rated over 300hp. I don't know why you’re set on thinking it'll be lower.

USHotRod, Depending on weight of the GT, and gearing, the new GT might be right smack in Ls-1 territory. There's Ford playing catch-up with the GT once again . The 3400lb-3450lb 305hp Mach-1 which also dyno's at around 275rwhp has already layed down some good low 13 sec 1/4 miles. MM&FF has gotten 13.0 figures and even Motor Trend pulled a 13.2@sub-107mph times with a 5spd Mach-1.

The current GT weighs in the 32XX's. Assuming a 100-150lb weight gain to Mach-1 weight or even a weight-loss, 3.55 gearing, the 3v 4.6 having more low-end grunt, and it coming with a live axle; this low 13 second 1/4's could very well likely be duplicable with a new GT.
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 11:08 PM
  #18  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
This thread is everywhere.

http://warnerrobert.com/ubb/ultimate...c;f=2;t=001673



http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?showtopic=724


http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=370178

Last edited by Z284ever; Sep 10, 2003 at 11:11 PM.
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #19  
Phantomcf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
From: North Richland Hills, Texas
Good, LS1 owners are safe from 05' and up stock GTs.
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 06:15 AM
  #20  
ProudPony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA


oops...
maybe I said too much?
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 06:51 AM
  #21  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
My point is, how do you know that the 275 hp should be the one quoted? It seems to me that the lower numbers would be more believeable because you are not going to restrict the car when testing it on a dyno, but, someone could easily do a few things to bump it up. We don't know how many cars dynoed what to see if there are some patterns. Maybe all of the cars but 1 were in the 250-260 range or maybe all but 1 were in the 265-275 range, we don't know. So until the new car comes out and real people get some baseline numbers, I will stay on the conservative side................and I still believe that the new GT will be rated below 300.
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 08:57 AM
  #22  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by SNEAKY NEIL
My point is, how do you know that the 275 hp should be the one quoted? It seems to me that the lower numbers would be more believeable because you are not going to restrict the car when testing it on a dyno, but, someone could easily do a few things to bump it up. We don't know how many cars dynoed what to see if there are some patterns. Maybe all of the cars but 1 were in the 250-260 range or maybe all but 1 were in the 265-275 range, we don't know. So until the new car comes out and real people get some baseline numbers, I will stay on the conservative side................and I still believe that the new GT will be rated below 300.
Fair enough.

A rating of less than 300 will be a real dissapointment though.
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 12:04 PM
  #23  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,610
From: Cincinnati, OH
I'd be real disappointed if it were below 300, also. Although maybe they're really trying to differentiate (sp?) the Cobra when it comes out with like 5098293043 hp or however much it'll have
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 03:27 PM
  #24  
ProudPony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Originally posted by SNEAKY NEIL
My point is, how do you know that the 275 hp should be the one quoted? It seems to me that the lower numbers would be more believeable because you are not going to restrict the car when testing it on a dyno, but, someone could easily do a few things to bump it up. We don't know how many cars dynoed what to see if there are some patterns. Maybe all of the cars but 1 were in the 250-260 range or maybe all but 1 were in the 265-275 range, we don't know. So until the new car comes out and real people get some baseline numbers, I will stay on the conservative side................and I still believe that the new GT will be rated below 300.
Another thing to note here is that no 2 dyno's will produce the same numbers. They are all independently calibrated and work at different ambient air temps, and even different elevations (as in sea level). You can dyno 281hp on one unit, go right down the street and dyno a 265hp run on a different unit. That is why it is important to do your before/after tesing on the same unit to help assure you of actual gains from your mod.

I myself have not seen any data sheets from an actual dyno run, but my understanding is that the cars (I am referring to anyways) were dyno'ed in stock trim to establish a baseline for engine performance and design parameters for add-on equipment. I really don't think any of these were "ringers" or factory freaks - especially this early in the game. Remember, these cars were released under confidentiality contracts - they were CERTAINLY not released to the press for thrashing and rag-stats.

I have been honest about it... I'm not the guy who dyno'ed the car(s).
Just take it for what it's worth.
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 08:15 PM
  #25  
morb|d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,440
From: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
that's exciting news about the GT. But I thought there was talk of putting the truck based 4.0 (or was it 4.2?) in the base V6 until the Duratec 3.5 was ready. And if the 3.5 will only be ready in 2006 then technically it won't make it into the new Stang for 2 years.
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #26  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
If the new GT does have 275 hp then that is the same #'s that the '01 Cobra put put. That is one hell of an improvement.
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 11:59 PM
  #27  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by morb|d
that's exciting news about the GT. But I thought there was talk of putting the truck based 4.0 (or was it 4.2?) in the base V6 until the Duratec 3.5 was ready. And if the 3.5 will only be ready in 2006 then technically it won't make it into the new Stang for 2 years.
Could be. The details aren't exactly clear yet.

The new Mustang is a 2005 year model. The 3.5 will come out in 2006 year models. That's 1 year after new Mustang is introduced, not 2.
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 07:38 AM
  #28  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally posted by ProudPony
Another thing to note here is that no 2 dyno's will produce the same numbers.
Which is odd, because there's nothing that should go "out of calibration" on a Dynojet. You've got a big mass, and some speed sensing - I don't see where the inconsistancy comes from, at least not in the dyno (now, the operator may make a big difference).
Old Sep 13, 2003 | 12:41 PM
  #29  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by morb|d
that's exciting news about the GT. But I thought there was talk of putting the truck based 4.0 (or was it 4.2?) in the base V6 until the Duratec 3.5 was ready. And if the 3.5 will only be ready in 2006 then technically it won't make it into the new Stang for 2 years.
I found this on the base 2005. According to this article, the base engine will be a 215hp 3.0 duratec for 2005. The 3.5 duratec will replace in 2006. No mention of the ancient 3.8L or the 4.2 truck motor.

http://info.detnews.com/autosinsider...x.cfm?id=10953

I thought this was interesting.

"Look for Mach and GT variants to continue, followed in model year 2006 by an all-new SVT Cobra"

I thought the Mach-1 was limited to a 2 year run (03/04). Has Ford changed their mind and decided to keep the Mach-1 around much longer? If so, that's really good.

I'd like the lineup to look like this:
base= sub-250hp 3.5L 24v duratec
GT= 300-315hp 4.6 24v modular
Mach= 350-390 5.4 32v N/A modular (think 390hp Falcon GT)
Cobra= 460-500hp 5.4 32v S/c'ed modular
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
Magenta_Hearts
New Member Introduction
4
Mar 25, 2015 10:24 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Feb 1, 2015 08:26 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 15, 2014 03:09 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
Dec 7, 2014 06:01 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.