05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
Actually, in some of the posts I have read on the future Camaro's hp levels, some are anticipating a 250hp V6, 400+hp V8 as the middle model, and much more for the top line model.
How is this any different from what Al said?
There were a number of posts where "anticipated" HP levels for GT would make it run faster than LS1. Not everyone, no, but my recollection is that it was an opinion thrown about here and there more than once.
To go and dig it up .. puhlease, there are better things to do than waste your time like that. Finding any vague information on the internet with "search" is rather time-consuming, mind-boggling, and oftentimes unfruitful.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by muckz
Case in pont: Now you see, this has the potential of being quoted 1 - 2 years from now as Oh Yeah, many here were talking about 400 HP mid-level V8.
How is this any different from what Al said?
How is this any different from what Al said?
That is quite a bit different from the statement about "400 HP mid-level V8s" that may or may not be available in a car that may or may not even be made.
There were a number of posts where "anticipated" HP levels for GT would make it run faster than LS1. Not everyone, no, but my recollection is that it was an opinion thrown about here and there more than once.
To go and dig it up .. puhlease, there are better things to do than waste your time like that. Finding any vague information on the internet with "search" is rather time-consuming, mind-boggling, and oftentimes unfruitful.
To go and dig it up .. puhlease, there are better things to do than waste your time like that. Finding any vague information on the internet with "search" is rather time-consuming, mind-boggling, and oftentimes unfruitful.
A) Back up the statement with facts to prove your point and thus retain/build credibility.
B) Not back it up and hope that the deaf, dumb, and blind loyal apologists believe you anyway.
C) Not care and thus not respond.
We can pretty much eliminate C) for you anybody that has responded to this thread, so where does that leave us? Perhaps you have a D) to add? I could probably come up with a few suggestions.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by muckz
Case in pont: Now you see, this has the potential of being quoted 1 - 2 years from now as Oh Yeah, many here were talking about 400 HP mid-level V8.
How is this any different from what Al said?
There were a number of posts where "anticipated" HP levels for GT would make it run faster than LS1. Not everyone, no, but my recollection is that it was an opinion thrown about here and there more than once.
To go and dig it up .. puhlease, there are better things to do than waste your time like that. Finding any vague information on the internet with "search" is rather time-consuming, mind-boggling, and oftentimes unfruitful.
How is this any different from what Al said?
There were a number of posts where "anticipated" HP levels for GT would make it run faster than LS1. Not everyone, no, but my recollection is that it was an opinion thrown about here and there more than once.
To go and dig it up .. puhlease, there are better things to do than waste your time like that. Finding any vague information on the internet with "search" is rather time-consuming, mind-boggling, and oftentimes unfruitful.
Exactly. First, LS1.com has had some problems with forum managment, and all the previous theads were probably deleted off into space.
LS2.com has an auto-delete where if it gets past a certain date, it too gets removed.
As for this site, I belive more people are a little cautious to open there mouth. But to say that no one said it is BS. I really wish LS2 kept all there old threads. There was always a GTO thread, and the 05 Mustang always was brought up.
I guess I should just save anything I see for future reference just to show Im right.
Look, point is that the Mustang is not what everyone said it would be. People said that it could take on a Mach1, and it cant post the numbers the Mach1 can.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Al. Nobody said that "noone said it". I could probably find somewhere that someone said damn anything I could dream up. That's not the point. You said "everyone". Now I'm not foolish enough to take that literally (and I'm trying to give you a bit of credit in that you didn't mean it to be literal - I could be wrong), however, you obviously believe that there are plenty of folks that said it was going to be that way - fine. Prove it. Excuses are like....well...you know what they are like.
I bet you've done your your search, and you've come up virtually empty handed. You can't back up your statement or you would have already. You're just too hard-headed (and too much of a GM apologist) to admit it.
Suck it up, get over it, and keep posting those little tidbits from GMInsidenews.com (a nice site, btw) so that some folks will go on believing that your some high-n-mighty "in the know" type.
PS....I can find posts I've made on LS1.com from July 2002. LS2.com can be searched all the way back to its beginnings in Feb 2004. Don't see a problem, shipmate.
I bet you've done your your search, and you've come up virtually empty handed. You can't back up your statement or you would have already. You're just too hard-headed (and too much of a GM apologist) to admit it.
Suck it up, get over it, and keep posting those little tidbits from GMInsidenews.com (a nice site, btw) so that some folks will go on believing that your some high-n-mighty "in the know" type.
PS....I can find posts I've made on LS1.com from July 2002. LS2.com can be searched all the way back to its beginnings in Feb 2004. Don't see a problem, shipmate.
Last edited by Bob Cosby; Nov 2, 2004 at 11:00 AM.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Look, point is that the Mustang is not what everyone said it would be. People said that it could take on a Mach1, and it cant post the numbers the Mach1 can.
FROM NOW ON, NO MORE SPECULATION! BIG AL WILL TAKE IT AS TRUTH AND WHINE ABOUT IT IN A FIVE (edit: SIX!) PAGE THREAD!
Also, the comments about 400hp mid-level V8's in the Camaro werent made by rational people, and shouldnt be taken seriously. Pacer's statement was about the most absurd thing I have ever read on this board.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Thanks again L.A. Z. 
I didn't want to point fingers at a specific poster because I own a few Fords. Thus, I would be discredited by association.
Hey, can I use Al's math??? If I use that, I can state that "everyone" thinks that the next gen Camaro will have a 400+hp mid V8 model.
Sorry, sometimes I just can't help myself.

I didn't want to point fingers at a specific poster because I own a few Fords. Thus, I would be discredited by association.

Hey, can I use Al's math??? If I use that, I can state that "everyone" thinks that the next gen Camaro will have a 400+hp mid V8 model.

Sorry, sometimes I just can't help myself.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM



