05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
Yeah yeah yeah....then everyone here would be in love with the GTO.
Point is that everyone PROMISED that this car would be LS1 Fbody beaters, yet when I bring is up, i.e. now, you get the backpeddling of "dyno isnt everything" and "track numbers dont mean jack" and then comes in the "at least Ford makes a pony car" crap.
Point is that everyone PROMISED that this car would be LS1 Fbody beaters, yet when I bring is up, i.e. now, you get the backpeddling of "dyno isnt everything" and "track numbers dont mean jack" and then comes in the "at least Ford makes a pony car" crap.
You talk about other people posting - in your words - crap, now I'm calling you on it. The statement above is pure crap. If it is not - PROVE IT.
I suggest doing a search on my posts first...see if I'm one of those "everyone" that "PROMISED" that the 05 would be an LS1 beater. Please.
Pretty please.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
I dont know what everyone said I just read the first page..it says 279 REAR WHEEL HP dynoed...
a 1995 Camaro didnt have 275 HP to the rear wheels??? it came from the factory with 275???
whats everyone bugging for?
a 1995 Camaro didnt have 275 HP to the rear wheels??? it came from the factory with 275???
whats everyone bugging for?
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
OH BS. Please - I challenge you to quote "everyone" that said the 05 Mustang would be an "LS1 Fbody beater".
You talk about other people posting - in your words - crap, now I'm calling you on it. The statement above is pure crap. If it is not - PROVE IT.
I suggest doing a search on my posts first...see if I'm one of those "everyone" that "PROMISED" that the 05 would be an LS1 beater. Please.
Pretty please.
You talk about other people posting - in your words - crap, now I'm calling you on it. The statement above is pure crap. If it is not - PROVE IT.
I suggest doing a search on my posts first...see if I'm one of those "everyone" that "PROMISED" that the 05 would be an LS1 beater. Please.
Pretty please.


There were probably two trolls who said that. However, because they were Ford Mustang Fans (GASP........... who could possibly be that), they represent every person who has ever liked any Ford product.

That would be as bad as those of us who do like some Ford products thinking that Al represents all GM fans.
Frightening to say the least.
Oh caps, you have to understand that some comparing these numbers to LT1's are like older people talking about the "good ol days." In other words, they ALL dyno'd over 280, and ALL LS1's dyno over 300. What they were rated at is irrelevant.
Frankly, I thought that was a pretty good showing for an engine rated at 300hp and 320lb ft of torque.
I think its just the fact that Ford had the audacity to continue to produce the Mustang............ and a completely new one at that........... that really pisses off some of the GM faithful. Thus, to them, the glass will always be half empty.
Last edited by 94LightningGal; Oct 31, 2004 at 12:48 PM.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Schismblade
Wow, 280 are what turd LS1s dyno. A4 98-00 are usually around the mid-high 290's, low 300's for the strong ones.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Aeromaks
You know, once you realize there is more to the world than quarter mile numbers and dyno charts, you will learn to live alot better.
As far as Ford mustang, great model, great car, great quality, the point is the mustang outsold the fbodies, so certainly ford did something right. for the 99% of the world that doesnt go drag racing every friday night instead of going out....13.2 versus 13.6 doesnt matter. What matters is they get to drive in a hot new car, with great build quality, gets more looks than some 10 yearold car, and makes them feel happy.
With the excpetion of power.... the mustang did everything right than the fbodies did wrong.
As far as Ford mustang, great model, great car, great quality, the point is the mustang outsold the fbodies, so certainly ford did something right. for the 99% of the world that doesnt go drag racing every friday night instead of going out....13.2 versus 13.6 doesnt matter. What matters is they get to drive in a hot new car, with great build quality, gets more looks than some 10 yearold car, and makes them feel happy.
With the excpetion of power.... the mustang did everything right than the fbodies did wrong.
How do any of us know about the kind of quality the new Mustang has? Yea, maybe it has a neato dash (BTW,
) and you can change the speedo lights. yayyy. What do we know that makes the Mustang > Camaro in quality? We will know about build quality in 5 or 6 years. As for the last Mustang having better build quality than the Camaro....Bwahahaha!
Last edited by Meccadeth; Nov 1, 2004 at 10:23 AM.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
So Mustang survived because Daddy bought them for his girl, but Camaro didn't because Daddy didn't?
Hmmm.
Hmmm.
Last edited by Gold_Rush; Nov 1, 2004 at 05:37 AM.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Meccadeth
I disagree infinitium. We could go on and on for decades about what GM did wrong with the Camaro that Ford did right with the Mustang. The only Ford did right with the Mustang was make it attractive to girls and sell it to fleets in absurd numbers. End all. The interior was every bit as much as crap as the Camaros. The back seats were inhabitable. It handled like my moms Taurus wagon. Blah, yada...don't give me that sh*t about what the Mustang did everything right while the Camaro didn't. The market shrank and the Camaro caught the bad end of the stick because teenage girls don't beg their daddy's to buy them a Z28, they want a Mustang because "their pretty."
How do any of us know about the kind of quality the new Mustang has? Yea, maybe it has a neato dash (BTW,
) and you can change the speedo lights. yayyy. What do we know that makes the Mustang > Camaro in quality? We will know about build quality in 5 or 6 years.
How do any of us know about the kind of quality the new Mustang has? Yea, maybe it has a neato dash (BTW,
) and you can change the speedo lights. yayyy. What do we know that makes the Mustang > Camaro in quality? We will know about build quality in 5 or 6 years.Your point is that the Mustang is every bit as ****ty as the Camaro was. Of course everyone else will take what you said literally -- word for word, and miss the whole point.
I believe GM had more to do with the Camaro dying than anything.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
OH BS. Please - I challenge you to quote "everyone" that said the 05 Mustang would be an "LS1 Fbody beater".
You talk about other people posting - in your words - crap, now I'm calling you on it. The statement above is pure crap. If it is not - PROVE IT.
I suggest doing a search on my posts first...see if I'm one of those "everyone" that "PROMISED" that the 05 would be an LS1 beater. Please.
Pretty please.
You talk about other people posting - in your words - crap, now I'm calling you on it. The statement above is pure crap. If it is not - PROVE IT.
I suggest doing a search on my posts first...see if I'm one of those "everyone" that "PROMISED" that the 05 would be an LS1 beater. Please.
Pretty please.

So you want me to go back over 2 years of posts to find a handful of quotes?
I know what I read cause it would be said over and over when the GTO came up. It always went something like this..
"The Mach 1 runs with teh LS1 fbody."
and next post
"The 05 Mustang GT will be faster then the Mach1"
Last edited by Big Als Z; Nov 1, 2004 at 03:51 AM.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
So you want me to go back over 2 years of posts to find a handful of quotes?
I know what I read cause it would be said over and over when the GTO came up. It always went something like this..
"The Mach 1 runs with teh LS1 fbody."
and next post
"The 05 Mustang GT will be faster then the Mach1"
I know what I read cause it would be said over and over when the GTO came up. It always went something like this..
"The Mach 1 runs with teh LS1 fbody."
and next post
"The 05 Mustang GT will be faster then the Mach1"
I don't think you know what you read at all. I think you know what you *wish* you read. Now prove it.
Please.
Originally Posted by Schismblade
I believe GM had more to do with the Camaro dying than anything.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Originally Posted by Gold_Rush
He seems to forget the fact that MORE guys (100k+) bought Mustangs than did girls/guys both f-bods combined, or that the percentage of female to male ratio of both cars isn't that far apart. Oops, there goes the whole "only little girls bought mustangs" argument.
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
If there were a handfull of people "promising" that the Mustang would be faster than an LS1 F-body, what difference would it make to begin with? They were wrong, but to patronize the Mustang because of others' wishfull thinking is down right dumb.
I think some people are just so Pro-GM/ Anti-Ford that they blind themselves to whats really going on.
Another issue...
Wasnt there a ZL1 Camaro back in the day that put up 11's from the factory? One could argue that it took GM 30 years to come close to that again, and they still have yet to best it. Ford didnt want to beat your precious LS1 with the GT. If they would have wanted to, they would have.
I can recall several threads in the past concerning different power levels from the Camaro for different models...the V6, the mid V8, and the 375-400hp V8. Everyone thought it was a great idea for the Camaro.....why not the Mustang?
I think some people are just so Pro-GM/ Anti-Ford that they blind themselves to whats really going on.
Another issue...
Wasnt there a ZL1 Camaro back in the day that put up 11's from the factory? One could argue that it took GM 30 years to come close to that again, and they still have yet to best it. Ford didnt want to beat your precious LS1 with the GT. If they would have wanted to, they would have.
I can recall several threads in the past concerning different power levels from the Camaro for different models...the V6, the mid V8, and the 375-400hp V8. Everyone thought it was a great idea for the Camaro.....why not the Mustang?
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Actually, in some of the posts I have read on the future Camaro's hp levels, some are anticipating a 250hp V6, 400+hp V8 as the middle model, and much more for the top line model.
Frankly, I think that is some major wishful thinking. Who is going to offer 150hp more in their one up jump???
L.A. Z, I agree with you on pretty much everything you say. Its nice to see a realistic Camaro owner. (yes I realize there are many)
Frankly, I think that is some major wishful thinking. Who is going to offer 150hp more in their one up jump???
L.A. Z, I agree with you on pretty much everything you say. Its nice to see a realistic Camaro owner. (yes I realize there are many)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 05 Dyno's 279rwhp and 300rwtq
Wow! It's amazing how built up people are getting about this. I think their some nice dyno numbers, end of story. Personally, I like mustangs AND camaro's. The whole rivalry things gets outa hand some times. I think competition is fun but then there's a lot of haters out there for no reason. For example,saying things like "if has a blue oval I'll never own it" type stuff and that's pretty childish.


