Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Quetion about a cam.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2003 | 05:10 PM
  #1  
bunker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Quetion about a cam.

I think this is for the advanced section, anyways I just got an XE cam but the Intake centerline is 114, its an XE 224/236 grind number 3314 & intake centerline 114, I thought almost all LT1 cams had 108 intake centerline? It is a 114 lobe separation aswell, & no degrees of advance into the cam, would this even work on our cars? What would be the disadvantage of running this cam as apposed to a regular XE 224/236? thanx guys, Dyno 2000 I just checked says a lot of power but would it work? Do I have to do anything special or just align the timing marks? Detonation problems etc... anything? thanx.
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 05:45 AM
  #2  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
The cam you describe would be an excellent cam. Probably more optimal for a blower than NA, but it's a matter of degree (pun intended) and it make a decentNA cam as well. Compared to a more typical 112 degree LSA used for an NA setup this cam with a 114 LSA will have less peak power but a somewhat broader power band.

Rich Krause
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 12:12 PM
  #3  
93formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,929
From: vancouver, BC, Canada
i think his concern is the intake centerline is 114 degrees, most cams are 108.
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 01:42 PM
  #4  
bunker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
yeah the intake centerline is what concerns me considering almost everyone of ours cams is 108
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 09:29 PM
  #5  
AlexA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 186
Yeah, it appears that cam has no advance built into it (LSA - LCA = advance). From what I've read, advancing a cam will yield more low end tq at the expense of top end tq and retarding a cam will yield more high end tq at the expense of low end tq.

Since your cam is more "retarded" (hehe) then the cams CC usually put out (4 degrees advance ground in), I'd assume this cam would make more top end power and less low end tq then the same cam with a 110 LCA. This all, more than likely, has to do with moving the intake open event.

BTW, most LT1 cams are 108 because the LSA is 112 (112 - 108 = 4 degrees advance). If the cam is 114 LSA, it usually has a LCA of 110 - I had such a cam at one point.

Someone please correct me if I farked up.

-Alex
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 11:53 PM
  #6  
bunker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Ohh sweet I guess I'll just advance the cloyes 2* not to have that big of difference
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 01:20 AM
  #7  
AlexA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 186
If you do that, you could throw off your timing. Be sure to take out 2 degrees of timing across the board in your PCM (including the cranking tables as well).

-Alex
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MDZ28
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Sep 24, 2015 09:15 AM
KamaroL98
N2O Tech
2
Sep 19, 2002 08:39 AM
Black Sunshine/ 00SS
Midwest
2
Sep 11, 2002 07:01 AM
IDOXLR8
Midwest
4
Aug 6, 2002 12:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.