Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Ignition unit New Delteq opti Delayed / another optispark replacement?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 07:47 AM
  #31  
got_hp?'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: sarasota, fl
Originally posted by Injuneer
the Opti has not been "eliminated" in either Stage 1 or Stage 2..... it has been "upgraded".
in stage 1 yes its still optical.........but in stage 2, the optical part is removed and replaced with magnetic..........so does that make it a magnetispark?
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 02:12 PM
  #32  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
Thank you for the correction Fred
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #33  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I'm just trying to make sure there is no misunderstanding..... my adventures with one of the few Electromotive Opti-Eliminator/SDI units left me a little suspicious of some new products.... and particularly when I see possibly one of the same people involved, and remember how little "customer support" I got from E'motive.

Last edited by Injuneer; Dec 14, 2003 at 05:11 PM.
Old Dec 14, 2003 | 05:56 PM
  #34  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
Hey Fred i have had an Idea for a few years but had a question no one has ever answered. It may help a few of us.

Does the 96- SBC Vortec Cam postion sensor(I.E. plastic distributer) send out a compatable signal for a LT1 PCM?

I have worked on a few and have always wondered but never had the time or sources to find out.

IF it does Many of us could convert to this unit HARD part would be setting it. The Vortec is easy to set with a scan tool but we would not have that help on the LT1.

Just and Idea to add to what we all ready have

Then again it woild not eliminate the OPTI per say but move it to a new place

BTW I have yet to see one of thiese fail....I am sure they have but not nearly as often as a LT1 Opti
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 07:04 AM
  #35  
HOZZ4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 39
From: Northern Virginia
OneFlyn95z28,
The Vortec plastic distributor only outputs a once-per-cam-revolution pulse via a hall effect sensor.

This will NOT drive an LT1 computer...

-Pete
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 07:49 AM
  #36  
Maldo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 691
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally posted by HOZZ4
OneFlyn95z28,
The Vortec plastic distributor only outputs a once-per-cam-revolution pulse via a hall effect sensor.

This will NOT drive an LT1 computer...

-Pete


Why couldn't someone just adapt a pcm from anther GM model to our cars so that it does not require the input from the opti?

Old Dec 15, 2003 | 09:08 AM
  #37  
ericcer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 49
From: Largo, FL
I have the unit installed but it is on my Vette. Thought you guys would like to look anyway.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=710111
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 02:17 PM
  #38  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
Originally posted by Maldo
Why couldn't someone just adapt a pcm from anther GM model to our cars so that it does not require the input from the opti?

Just get a FAST/gen7dfi etc..
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 03:37 PM
  #39  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally posted by Maldo
Why couldn't someone just adapt a pcm from anther GM model to our cars so that it does not require the input from the opti?

How many other sequential EFI, 8-cyl setups does GM sell, other than the LS1?

The Opti low res pulse pattern is nothing exotic. I always felt that you could start with the cam position signal from the MSD CPC distributor "stub".... fits fine under the cowl of a 4th GEN.... and do a translation from the MSD signal to the Opti pulse pattern on a chip. Or, put the stock Mitsubishi optical sensor in a pancake distributor housing.
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 08:43 PM
  #40  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
Thank you HOZZ4. Finaly an answer!

Here is why I ask

http://groups.msn.com/WashingtonFBod...to&PhotoID=530

Not to mention it a Distributor OPTI replacement would let us all run a Standard SBC block!

Last edited by OneFlyn95z28; Dec 15, 2003 at 11:08 PM.
Old Dec 15, 2003 | 11:17 PM
  #41  
94-3.4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 503
From: Fort Collins, CO
So if my current opti is having issues would this unit bring my ignition back to life or is it more like to ltcc where it needs a good opti to function?
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 07:38 AM
  #42  
HOZZ4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 39
From: Northern Virginia
94-3.4
The "Stage 1" system needs the Opti Sensors to be in place. The cap and rotor, however, are not needed.

OneFlyn95z28
Yes, I have seen people do the old-style distributor on the LT1 as long as they have aftermarket engine management.
On an F-Body, you could probably adjust the timing by cutting an access hole in the dashboard to turn the distributor! Just kidding...
I wonder if you could even remove the distributor on a regular SBC in an LT1. I used to have a 3.4L 4th gen, and you had to insert the bolts in the upper intake when you installed it...or else you wouldn't be able to get the bolts in! The y would hit the firewall. So, I would bet that a distributor would be "non-servicable" in an SBC 4th gen.

Pete
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 08:48 AM
  #43  
CCCCCYA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 356
From: Oakland City, IN
HOZZ4: From what I've measured, the answer to whether you could remove a regular dist. from an LT1 when installed in a 4th gen (without a modified cowl) is a resounding no. Just not enough room under there to pick it up and out. You COULD however put in a stubby dist. body (IE for just signal pickup purposes), and remove/install it by pulling the intake manifold along with it. Even then, it's ultra tight. I wouldn't think that it would be a concern though, as there would be nothing to go wrong with the dist shaft other than the drive gear, or the oil pump drive slot, and you would be stopping in short order and pulling the engine (or at least the intake) either way...

Yet another view

Dave C.

Last edited by CCCCCYA; Dec 16, 2003 at 09:03 AM.
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 03:38 PM
  #44  
aram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 377
From: San Diego, CA
Originally posted by ericcer
I have the unit installed but it is on my Vette. Thought you guys would like to look anyway.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=710111
Looks awesome!! I know what I am swapping to if my optispark ever dies.

Those coils look like the exact same ones as come on my GTP, I wonder if they are the same, if so the coils are really easy to come by at most junkyards or ebay.
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 10:09 PM
  #45  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
Hehehe we also had a 3.4

I would like to find a suitable replacement for the opti. Problem might be that it turns at half the speed of the Motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.