Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Can you fit a belt drive in place of the standard chain on the LT1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 05:49 AM
  #1  
Rob94hawk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 341
Can you fit a belt drive in place of the standard chain on the LT1?

Was looking into this years back. Was wondering if there are any benefits to using a belt instead of a chain for the cam/crank? And if one was ever fitted to an LT1?

Edit: nevermind. Forgot about the optispark. Also found this thread: https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=667770

Last edited by Rob94hawk; Jun 19, 2009 at 05:53 AM.
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 10:04 PM
  #2  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,109
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Engine Masters magazine, Summer 2007 issue, did comparison testing of timing sets on an 440 Mopar. They used a chain drive, a belt drive, a fixed-idler gear drive and a dual-idler gear drive. There was no significant advantage on the HP side - average HP varied by less than 1HP and average torque varied by less than 1 lb-ft (on a 630HP NA engine). They found the Jesel belt easiest for adjusting cam advance because the Jesel mounts externaly.
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #3  
camaro383tt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 99
From: Houston
the fastest lt1 fbody was using one
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #4  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
I'm surprised the gains with the belt were not greater than that. Then again, I wouldn't think it would be enough to get an accurate reading on the dyno. I would have quessed at least 3-4 HP, but what do I know.
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
Steve in Seattle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,445
From: Seattle, WA
I belive the tests. A fresh chain, gear drive or belt drive won't show hardly any deflection/timing losses, and the power needed to turn a valve train is so substancially more than any tiny weight savings as to be insignificant.

Possible advantages:
1) external belt drive could be easier to dial a cam or replace a broken or stretched belt.
2) belt drive "could" be made fairly thick to increase durability.
3) belts have naturally more harmonic dampening, but LT1's don't run rear mounted distributors, just oil pumps, so I doubt there will be many gains there. If it really bothered you it'd be easier to do an external wet, or a dry pump system and get it off the cam entirely.

With LT1 computers running out at ~7200 rpms, the high rpm vibration issues other small blocks see at 8000-9000 just don't exist at say 6500. Cost and fab would be far greater than any real gains. Spend the money on a dry sump system, or lighter valves, or beehive springs, or... well you get the idea.

Unless you run a carb'd LT1 or an aftermarket PCM and intend on breaking 7000rpms you're probably better off with just a LTx Extreme Dutychain and a billet sprocket set... although the ability to dial a cam easily would be nice for racers tuning new set ups... but that's an awefully expensive upgrade (Jesel belt drive + aftermarket PCM)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
Dec 20, 2014 09:11 PM
Ricardo
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
0
Nov 29, 2014 10:58 AM
siguy
Parts For Sale
3
Nov 27, 2014 10:07 AM
Snoman73
Cars For Sale
0
Nov 17, 2014 07:22 PM
1LEThumper
Forced Induction
40
Jul 14, 2003 12:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.