1000hp N/a
How ironic....SStokerAce was in that engine masters program 
He would've won too...but a loose bolt caused him to lose oil pressure and he didn't want to keep dynoing it.
I'll lett him tell the story...but just wait til next year when he builds the big blocl

He would've won too...but a loose bolt caused him to lose oil pressure and he didn't want to keep dynoing it.
I'll lett him tell the story...but just wait til next year when he builds the big blocl
Originally posted by WickEdSix98
did any of you guys see the engine masters challenge in one of those magazines?? it was a contest to see who could make the most power out of a small block (chevy, mopar, or ford) that has to be under 360 inches and run on pump gas and they score it by averaging the hp and torque numbers from 2500-6500RPMs, there may be more rules, but one of the Ford guys was running 16:1 compression with 92 octane fuel!! im guessing he had a cam ground so that it would open a early enough to bleed the extra pressure off so it wouldnt detinate, i think that guy got second and it peaked at like 604 hp and 58X torque, it siad this motor would cost over $20000-25000 to duplicate! the guy that won had a SBC with AFR heads that made like 602 HP and 59X torque, this motor was something like 15000-20000 to duplicate
did any of you guys see the engine masters challenge in one of those magazines?? it was a contest to see who could make the most power out of a small block (chevy, mopar, or ford) that has to be under 360 inches and run on pump gas and they score it by averaging the hp and torque numbers from 2500-6500RPMs, there may be more rules, but one of the Ford guys was running 16:1 compression with 92 octane fuel!! im guessing he had a cam ground so that it would open a early enough to bleed the extra pressure off so it wouldnt detinate, i think that guy got second and it peaked at like 604 hp and 58X torque, it siad this motor would cost over $20000-25000 to duplicate! the guy that won had a SBC with AFR heads that made like 602 HP and 59X torque, this motor was something like 15000-20000 to duplicate
"Shoulda, coulda, wouldas" aside, his engine was very competitive with the winners based on his development dyno testing. There's a write-up on him in Feb 2003 Popular Hot Rodding.
I was skeptical that he could run a true 11.7:1 static CR and dynamic around 9:1, but he proved to me that it could be done, as did others.
The top engines in that contest, which was scored not on peak hp and torque, but on the average hp plus average torque from 2500-6500, showed more grunt from 366 cubes than most big block NA pump gas engines you've seen in magazines and in cars.
Bret's engine idled without a lope below 900 rpm, and had torque from 2500 on that was truly impressive.
Yeah, $15,000 to $20,000 is about right to duplicate one of the top engines. IMO, that's not unreasonable for that much grunt on 92 octane.
If you don't already know, Bret and I are related. I'm very proud of his accomplishment.
Jon
O.k.
The top 2 guys had power numbers of around 610-620 at peak and TQ of 530 ft lbs. No way you could get 580-590 peak on a 365 cube engine. Follow the old lb ft per liter rule. 90-100 is about what you can expect max in race engines. This contest had about 88 with the winners, I expected 540 with coatings. That would have been 90 ft lbs per L with a 365 (6.0L) engine. Not bad considering the rules and application.
My peak TQ was about the same without coatings, so that means alot to me. My HP # was about 40hp down, but it was a contest about average power and torque, not about peak HP. I had a cam to get 610hp, and it sits in my shop still not in the engine. BTW that cam specs are what Rich is looking at now. The thing is I found that the average is better if I don't sacrafice power below peak TQ for HP up top. Were I had those guys was below peak TQ, alot of little tricks went into making that better (one of them was a 9:1 dynamic comp ratio on pump gas), and since I didn't place nobody really knows them for next year. ;-)
Anyways, yeah I ****ed up and must have missed the TQ spec on the oil pump stud. I can't figure out how because I TQ things 3 times. I will now have a wrench that can get in there better and some Loc Tite on oil pump studs now. That and a better checklist for the engine buildup.
As it sits now it was a top 5 engine, (my guess was 3rd) but that's the top spot for non coated engines. If it was coated I really think it would have won. Oh well just proves to me the design was dead nuts.
Anyways, yeah the contest is fun, It teaches one alot about building BAD *** STREET MOTORS, and that's why I post here because that is something we are all looking for.
We all wish we had the $ to get in this contest, belive me it's not cheap to win. You can't expect a $2000 engine to compete with a $20K engine.
I'm hoping to get the big block buildup all financed and rolling, it depends upon alot of things. I am siked for next year, but I think that the new rules are going to be fun and since that stupid nut came loose I have been thinking about next years engine.
BTW That 365 SBC is for sale and I'll basically take what it's worth in parts for it. ($15K) If it won, It would most likely be about $5-6K higher. Let me correct that, if it won the $75K that came with the win is what it would take on top to buy that one, but I would build a 400 version of it for someone for $20K
Anyways, thanks. That contest was awesome.
Bret
The top 2 guys had power numbers of around 610-620 at peak and TQ of 530 ft lbs. No way you could get 580-590 peak on a 365 cube engine. Follow the old lb ft per liter rule. 90-100 is about what you can expect max in race engines. This contest had about 88 with the winners, I expected 540 with coatings. That would have been 90 ft lbs per L with a 365 (6.0L) engine. Not bad considering the rules and application.
My peak TQ was about the same without coatings, so that means alot to me. My HP # was about 40hp down, but it was a contest about average power and torque, not about peak HP. I had a cam to get 610hp, and it sits in my shop still not in the engine. BTW that cam specs are what Rich is looking at now. The thing is I found that the average is better if I don't sacrafice power below peak TQ for HP up top. Were I had those guys was below peak TQ, alot of little tricks went into making that better (one of them was a 9:1 dynamic comp ratio on pump gas), and since I didn't place nobody really knows them for next year. ;-)
Anyways, yeah I ****ed up and must have missed the TQ spec on the oil pump stud. I can't figure out how because I TQ things 3 times. I will now have a wrench that can get in there better and some Loc Tite on oil pump studs now. That and a better checklist for the engine buildup.
As it sits now it was a top 5 engine, (my guess was 3rd) but that's the top spot for non coated engines. If it was coated I really think it would have won. Oh well just proves to me the design was dead nuts.
Anyways, yeah the contest is fun, It teaches one alot about building BAD *** STREET MOTORS, and that's why I post here because that is something we are all looking for.
We all wish we had the $ to get in this contest, belive me it's not cheap to win. You can't expect a $2000 engine to compete with a $20K engine.
I'm hoping to get the big block buildup all financed and rolling, it depends upon alot of things. I am siked for next year, but I think that the new rules are going to be fun and since that stupid nut came loose I have been thinking about next years engine.
BTW That 365 SBC is for sale and I'll basically take what it's worth in parts for it. ($15K) If it won, It would most likely be about $5-6K higher. Let me correct that, if it won the $75K that came with the win is what it would take on top to buy that one, but I would build a 400 version of it for someone for $20K
Anyways, thanks. That contest was awesome.
Bret
Originally posted by JordonMusser
Aren't there some canted valve $$$ SBC na chevies making close to 1khp? was thinking I read about a 9XX one..
Aren't there some canted valve $$$ SBC na chevies making close to 1khp? was thinking I read about a 9XX one..

Take care,
Chuck Riddeck
Originally posted by Mr. Horsepower
Quite a number of "race" small-blocks are at 1000 and better. I happen to know of a 498 cid small block which has put out 932 hp on 93 octane utilizing a Brodix BD2000 cylinder head and quite a bit of engineering.
Take care,
Chuck Riddeck
Quite a number of "race" small-blocks are at 1000 and better. I happen to know of a 498 cid small block which has put out 932 hp on 93 octane utilizing a Brodix BD2000 cylinder head and quite a bit of engineering.

Take care,
Chuck Riddeck
114hp per L, that is really good for a huge small block. Those heads help. I would guess a 400+cfm head to do that.
Bret
well i may have remebered it incorrectly but i can almost swear in the last Popular Hot Rodding issue it claimed Joe Shermans motor made about 58X torque....oh well..good luck next year, also, how big are the motors gonna be for nexts years competition? i wont be that suprised if its an oval port motor that wins it if its still 2500-6500...
Last edited by WickEdSix98; Jan 31, 2003 at 11:12 AM.
Originally posted by WickEdSix98
well i may have remebered it incorrectly but i can almost swear in the last Popular Hot Rodding issue it claimed Joe Shermans motor made about 58X torque....oh well..good luck next year, also, how big are the motors gonna be for nexts years competition? i wont be that suprised if its an oval port motor that wins it if its still 2500-6500...
well i may have remebered it incorrectly but i can almost swear in the last Popular Hot Rodding issue it claimed Joe Shermans motor made about 58X torque....oh well..good luck next year, also, how big are the motors gonna be for nexts years competition? i wont be that suprised if its an oval port motor that wins it if its still 2500-6500...
Oval Port Big Block? Who said it was even going to be a Chevy? Maybe a Hemi? Maybe a Mopar, maybe a FORD or a BOP? Who knows. Everyone will try something different. I don't care about different I want to win.
470 cube limit, 2500-6500, almost the same rules except the lifters have to be flat tappet. (which is there to take out costs, but it just adds ALOT more costs, If they wanted to make it cheap, they would allow solid rollers. It's not like we don't run those now. BTW they are outlawed because they are not "street" parts. Someone tell that to Jason Short!)
Bret
13.7 bar BMEP is standard fare for well developed street engines. That is the output of the engine in question. 144 naturally aspirated hp per liter also sounds a bit sketchy... but it's been done and those numbers will rise with time.
Take care,
Take care,
Originally posted by Mr. Horsepower
144 naturally aspirated hp per liter also sounds a bit sketchy... but it's been done and those numbers will rise with time.
144 naturally aspirated hp per liter also sounds a bit sketchy... but it's been done and those numbers will rise with time.

-Mindgame
Re: 1000hp N/a
Originally Posted by Mindgame
A 383, normally aspirated, on pump gas, making 1000 hp????
I need to meet this guy/gal/god.... what's the name of this shop?
-Mindgame
I need to meet this guy/gal/god.... what's the name of this shop?
-Mindgame
Originally Posted by number77
i don't know but i will find out, and i'm, not for sure if it was pump gas
Originally Posted by Mindgame
That changes everything then. See, if you take away the "pump gas" factor, then you have unlimited rpm, compression, etc....... basically a race engine that wouldn't be suitable for street action. Big difference there.
I use to race a 1000 hp n/a small-block... one of Sonny's creations. It took over 500 cid and close to 10k rpm to do it though. And no, I didn't drive the car to work.
-Mindgame
I use to race a 1000 hp n/a small-block... one of Sonny's creations. It took over 500 cid and close to 10k rpm to do it though. And no, I didn't drive the car to work.

-Mindgame
well its been a while but out of no where the name hit me. Dennis Faerman. like i said before i don't know what kind of gas it was on, i just know that my friend said that guy knew his stuff.
Originally Posted by number77
sorry to bring this one back...
well its been a while but out of no where the name hit me. Dennis Faerman. like i said before i don't know what kind of gas it was on, i just know that my friend said that guy knew his stuff.
well its been a while but out of no where the name hit me. Dennis Faerman. like i said before i don't know what kind of gas it was on, i just know that my friend said that guy knew his stuff.

BTW- I saw a naturally aspirated motor on the SAM dyno put down 999.9hp a few weeks ago...
Re: 1000hp N/a
BTW.....
RMRE's Darrin Morgain said..... "a 396 SBC with Little Chief heads can make 1090hp NA"
So it can be done, but a buddy got a price quote on those... $10K a pop for the heads, plus you need a special block.... I think I'd look up Kaase for a BIG motor before I did that. Hell 815cubes and 1600hp sounds like a better deal for that kind of bill!! Still way cool to see a 1000+hp NA small block
Bret
RMRE's Darrin Morgain said..... "a 396 SBC with Little Chief heads can make 1090hp NA"
So it can be done, but a buddy got a price quote on those... $10K a pop for the heads, plus you need a special block.... I think I'd look up Kaase for a BIG motor before I did that. Hell 815cubes and 1600hp sounds like a better deal for that kind of bill!! Still way cool to see a 1000+hp NA small block
Bret


